Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for France-Soir

Channel

France-Soir

@france_soir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

27,032subscribers

-33 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001403259346
TypeChannel
Username@france_soir
DescriptionRetrouvez l’actualité dans notre média indépendant 📰. France-Soir est financé par ses lecteurs. Faites un don à : http://francesoir.fr/soutien
Created23 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/france_soir

Growth

27,02927,06527,0476 August 2026 — 27,065 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,065 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,062 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,060 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,052 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,042 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,038 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,033 subscribers14 August 2026 — 27,035 subscribers15 August 2026 — 27,029 subscribers16 August 2026 — 27,032 subscribers27,0326 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,024–27,070 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 20:3727,032+3
15 Aug 2026, 12:5827,029-6
14 Aug 2026, 01:4327,035+2
12 Aug 2026, 20:1527,033-5
11 Aug 2026, 20:0227,038-4
10 Aug 2026, 16:5227,042-10
9 Aug 2026, 18:4127,052-8
8 Aug 2026, 16:3327,060-2
7 Aug 2026, 15:4227,062-3
6 Aug 2026, 12:5027,065no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:5327,065first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.0%
avg views ÷ 27,032 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,600
60 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held60 (1 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total276,080
Reactions total8,974
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,030
Videos
1,290
Links
11,900

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

8,974 reactions across 60 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,24713.9%
🤮1,16413.0%
🤬1,09612.2%
👏1,09212.2%
🔥7107.91%
💩7067.87%
5946.62%
🤡4765.30%
🤣4454.96%
🤔4114.58%
😈3724.15%
😡1041.16%
🥴981.09%
😁880.981%
🙏570.635%
🤯490.546%
🤷‍♂320.357%
💯300.334%
👎280.312%
🍾260.29%
23 further kinds1491.66%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,974reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC≈1,440 views64 reactionsread 17 August 2026

⚠️ L’OMS promeut la « prescription sociale » - Quand une institution mondiale doit rappeler officiellement qu’un être humain a besoin des autres pour aller bien, c’est peut-être le signe que quelque chose s’est déjà brisé dans notre société. #PrescriptionSociale #OMS #Société #Santé Quand l'OMS doit prescrire des amis : le symptôme d'une société qui a oublié l'évidence https://francesoir.fr/societe-sante/quand-l-oms-

🤬35👍9🔥7🥴5🙈3💩2🤡2🗿1

17 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC≈1,370 views88 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🚨 Nouvelle cyberattaque massive contre la DGFiP : près de 680 000 contribuables touchés, données fiscales extraites (revenu, quotient familial, taux de prélèvement…). Bercy encore piraté. #Cyberattaque #DGFiP #Impots #Sécurité https://francesoir.fr/politique-france/cyberattaque-bercy-annonce-des-intrusions-en-juin-et-en-juillet-les-donnees-d

🤮46🤬31😁8🔥21

15 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC≈3,760 views86 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🏝️ Une intention intérieure, un plateau de sable et des figurines : l’inconscient s’exprime par les archétypes et répare en silence. Méthode née de Jung et formalisée par Dora Kalff. #Psychologie #Inconscient #Jung #Thérapie https://francesoir.fr/lifestyle-bien-etre/le-jeu-de-sable-cette-methode-nee-de-jung-qui-laisse-l-inconscient-s-exprimer

👍4828🤔8👀1🤣1

15 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC≈3,960 views156 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Un simple balade en forêt booste l'immunité pendant un mois https://francesoir.fr/lifestyle-vie-quotidienne/un-simple-balade-en-foret-booste-l-immunite-pendant-un-mois

👍10839🥰9

14 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC≈3,860 views180 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🚨 200 MILLIARDS DE DOLLARS. C'est ce que 29 États américains réclament à Meta, accusé d'avoir rendu les ados accros à Facebook et Instagram en toute connaissance de cause. Le procès s'ouvre mardi à Oakland. ⚖️🔥https://www.francesoir.fr/societe-justice/deux-cents-milliards-de-dollars-c-est-la-somme-que-reclament-les-etats-americains

👏122👍299🔥7🤣7🤡5👌1

14 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC≈3,660 views192 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Camouflet pour l'Élysée : le Conseil constitutionnel censure l'interdiction des réseaux sociaux aux moins de 15 ans, jugée "disproportionnée". La mesure phare de fin de règne macroniste retoquée sèchement 💥📱 https://www.francesoir.fr/politique-france/securite-fin-de-vie-pesticides-l-inventaire-la-prevert-du-conseil-constitutionnel

👍90🤔40👏29😁11🍾9🤡54🙏4

14 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC≈4,070 views200 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🚨 Le Conseil constitutionnel valide l'aide à mourir, mais sous condition : les établissements catholiques ne pourront refuser l'acte que si un autre existe à proximité. Victoire en trompe l'œil pour les Petites Sœurs des Pauvres. ⚠️ https://www.francesoir.fr/societe/loi-fin-de-vie-apres-les-petites-soeurs-des-pauvres-les-etablissements-catholiques-face-au

🤮112😈27🙏23🤬209🤔5🔥2🤯2

14 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC≈3,740 views90 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Quand un tribun populiste affronte un homme déguisé en poubelle… et que le second grignote un quart des votes. La politique britannique bascule dans le spectacle. #UK #ReformUK #Europe Farage, quand la politique britannique bascule dans la satire mais gagne la manche https://francesoir.fr/politique-monde/farage-quand-la-politique-britannique-bascule-dans-la-satire-mais-gagne-la-manche

54🤣22🔥10🤮3🙉1

14 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC≈3,860 views91 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🚨 Twitch active par défaut l’entraînement des IA d’Amazon sur vos lives, VOD, clips et chats. Opt-out obligatoire, sinon c’est inclus. Le directeur produit avoue : « Si c’était opt-in, personne ne le ferait ». #Twitch #IA #Amazon #ViePrivée https://francesoir.fr/societe-science-tech/twitch-au-coeur-d-une-polemique-apres-avoir-annonce-l-usage-des-donnees-de-ses

🔥39🤬37🤮123

13 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC≈5,490 views113 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Trump veut le Groenland. Pékin les Îles Cook. Macron, lui, veut brader nos eaux du Pacifique. Les territoires isolés sont devenus le nouvel or géopolitique. https://www.francesoir.fr/politique-monde/aux-iles-cook-le-scrutin-que-personne-ne-regardait-pourrait-annoncer-une-nouvelle

🤬75💩15🙈9😁5🔥32👍2💯2

13 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC≈4,350 views175 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🔥🚒 Grève nationale des pompiers ce 13 août. Depuis le 7 août, 9 organisations réclament un financement "pérenne, juste et ambitieux" des SDIS. Après la rencontre avec Nuñez : la déception. Prochaine mobilisation le 29 septembre à Paris. https://edition.francesoir.fr/politique-france/pompiers-en-greve-en-pleine-canicule-les-pompiers-decouvrent-que-leur-colere-n-est

🔥11139🤬173🙏3🤣1🤮1

13 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC≈3,920 views103 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🌑 Quand le ciel s’obscurcit, les ombres révèlent… Il était une fois des éclipses qui arrêtaient les guerres ou sauvaient des vies. Aujourd’hui, ce ne sont plus les astres qui s’éclipsent… ce sont les vérités. Pendant qu’on signe des déclarations solennelles sur « l’intégrité de l’information », les zones d’ombre autour du pouvoir restent soigneusement protégées. Une éclipse n’invente rien. Elle retire le masque. Dé

👍7619🔥5👎1💯1🙉1

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @france_soir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 37,790 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Silvano Trotta Officiel
@trottasilvano · 124,007
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“France-Soir” (@france_soir), 27,032 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/france_soir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.