Кто как на работу сегодня пошел?
- На коне18%
- Без коня62%
- Я на порше (не работаю) 🧠21%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@learning_teaching_avromash
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
197subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002392012033 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @learning_teaching_avromash |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/learning_teaching_avromash |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 197 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 197 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 16 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
95 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 62 | 65.3% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 11.6% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 7.37% | |
| custom 5359822166944682236 | 4 | 4.21% | |
| custom 5359291961821925557 | 3 | 3.16% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 3.16% | |
| custom 5359391871351167283 | 2 | 2.11% | |
| custom 5357331665733586910 | 1 | 1.05% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.05% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.05% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 12 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кто как на работу сегодня пошел?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Увидела уже 545-ый пост в тг-каналах о том, как надо бережно к себе в первые дни после длинных январских. И чето у меня подгорело. Почти все посты начинаются с того, что надо дать себе время вкатиться, притормозить коней в первый день. И вот я понять не могу. А что, у кого-то эти кони есть?... Вот из тех, кто сейчас читает этот пост. Вы прям реально сегодня с горящими глазами (и конями) на работу побежали? Тольк…
❤3💯1
Все мы очень-очень давно делали «что-то» с огромным энтузиазмом, а потом забивали на это «что-то» из-за срочного, важного, навязанного? У меня таких «что-то» было много. А потом пришли учёба, работа, успешныйуспех и все эти бизнес-корпоративные приколы)) Так вот, недавно я вернула это «что-то» в жизнь! Это фотография на любимую (полу)зеркальную Sony 🫶 И я вдруг вспомнила, что вообще-то кайфую дичайше!!!!! ℹ️ Каж…
❤18
Дорогой Дедушка Мороз, подари мне и всем моим подписчикам исполнения той самой мечты, которую мы напишем/написали на бумажке в 00 и съедим/съели*, запивая шампусиком 🙏 Спасибо, что в 25ом были со мной! * на Бали уже встретили ✅
❤19custom 53592919618219255573🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
😁3
Я любовник! Судя по результатам вот этого теста на архетипы. ➡️Мне нравится думать про архетипы(да и про другие типологии) как об источнике энергии То есть? Зная свой архетип, я убеждаю себя в том, что в чем-то конкретном хороша, имею выдающиеся способности. А чем больше я вижу у себя способностей, тем увереннее я могу пробовать новое в разных сферах и улучшать свою жизнь. ⭕️Пример: Вот узнала я, что я заботливый…
❤4custom 53593918713511672832custom 53598221669446822362custom 53573316657335869101
Надеюсь мы все тут знаем, что месяц назад вышел Tom and Jerry: The Golden Era (Barbera-Hanna) Все 114 классических мультфильмов, в хронологическом порядке, без вырезок и в восстановленном качестве 🥹 Почему-то я раньше думала, что мульт из 90х, такие анимации четкие, озвучка, отрисовка... А это 40-50е. Ну ребята, ну прикиньте! ▶️ Enjoy #душевныереки
❤5🔥2
Я реализую себя в отношениях? Прохожу я значит тест на архетипы и натыкаюсь на вопрос: Я реализую себя в отношениях. Почти никогда / Редко / Иногда / Обычно / Почти всегда? Поймала себя на мысли, что мне вопрос непонятен. В моей голове реализация — это про движение, преодоление. А в моих отношениях сейчас не движение и преодоление, а приятная стабильность, спокойствие и безопасность 🥰 Значит ли это, что я не реали…
custom 53598221669446822362
Восток в тренде, согласно новому тренд-репорту «Контент и продажи в 2026 году» от Setters. Ну наконец-то! Приятно, потому что я: 💚 востоковед; 💚 в данный момент тоже на востоке Поэтому держите фото меня в моднявой бабл тишной и ждите иногда контента о востоке🌴 Ну и отчет, конечно, можете прочитать, если интересно. Мне было интересно как минимум для структуризации и подтверждения своих гипотез. Доступно к скачиван…
❤11
А еще, произошел коллаборасьон 👇 Товарищи обученцы, что думаете? Какие еще пункты к моему топ-листу добавим?
❤1🔥1😍1
💚 Как выбрать провайдера обучения? Поговорили с Марией Аврамовой, L&D manager платформы корпоративного менторинга Solvery о том, как выбрать партнёра для развития своего бизнеса и команды. «Я перебрала десятки провайдеров, когда работала L&D инхаус в Ozon. И теперь, будучи уже на стороне провайдера Solvery, я вижу картину изнутри — и понимаю, насколько легко компании ошибаются». ▶️ Читайте 6 советов в наших карточ…
👍7🔥6❤1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @learning_teaching_avromash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто как на работу сегодня пошел?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 12 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,230,901 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Учусь и учу ❇️” (@learning_teaching_avromash), 197 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/learning_teaching_avromash.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.