Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net +4,088. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,938–44,382 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 06:57
43,754
+124
19 Sept 2026, 08:22
43,630
-19
16 Sept 2026, 20:16
43,649
+539
15 Sept 2026, 01:38
43,110
-20
13 Sept 2026, 08:01
43,130
+9
11 Sept 2026, 09:17
43,121
+68
8 Sept 2026, 16:39
43,053
+428
5 Sept 2026, 09:22
42,625
+466
3 Sept 2026, 16:14
42,159
+238
2 Sept 2026, 05:42
41,921
+698
1 Sept 2026, 02:46
41,223
-5
31 Aug 2026, 01:07
41,228
-14
30 Aug 2026, 02:43
41,242
-19
29 Aug 2026, 06:04
41,261
-18
28 Aug 2026, 06:28
41,279
+10
27 Aug 2026, 04:35
41,269
+29
26 Aug 2026, 01:48
41,240
+25
25 Aug 2026, 05:22
41,215
+67
24 Aug 2026, 03:06
41,148
+514
22 Aug 2026, 09:28
40,634
first reading
Engagement
294 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
45.2%
avg views ÷ 43,754 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,800
155 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
155
of 294 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
294 (2 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
3,068,389
Reactions total
180,522
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 11:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,030
Videos
≈408
Links
≈1,320
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
18m 36s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 41 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
307,673 reactions across 292 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
219,835
71.5%
🔥
28,917
9.40%
custom 5199858266078749730
17,400
5.66%
🙏
16,360
5.32%
😁
10,346
3.36%
👍
8,101
2.63%
custom 5199588782650725080
4,734
1.54%
custom 5206200966407296568
1,561
0.507%
👎
419
0.136%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 294 of the 294 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 307,963 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 294 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
328
across the posts below
Posts paid on
246
of 294 we hold a reading for · 84%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lapidarnst. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 294 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.02%
3 of 294 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
16,700
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
18,600
over 291 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFH8pwtM
1
17 September 2026
17 September 2026
2W5zFHz8Mj7
1
3 September 2026
3 September 2026
2W5zFJhHr3B
1
19 August 2026
19 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 294 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Смотрел на Женю Семененко на Непеле и подумал о двух вещах.
Первое - если бы Женя был автомобилем, то каким? Потому что, ну, он определенно машина. Ментальный убийца просто, вообще все равно ему, кто там и как откатался, кого судьи хотят видеть первым и так далее. Качество ценнейшее - и оно было у него всегда. Если мы в ближайшие пару циклов будем выступать в командике, Женя обязан в нем быть. Идеальный командный бо…
Не имеет никакого значения, сколько Ирина Хавронина/Девид Нарижный набрали за свой ритм-танец на Непеле. Оценки даже не запомнил, хотя как отсечка на будущее это, безусловно, значимо.
А вот прокат запомнил. И зрители с судьями, думаю, тоже. Это сейчас гораздо важнее.
От души поздравляю Иру с Девидом с возвращением. И молюсь за колено Девида. Нам очень нужна эта пара в сборной.
Рад, что сейчас у них все хорошо.
@l…
Из позитивного по итогам КП у мужчин на Непеле - очень приятное судейство.
Вообще тенденции в этом направлении пока сугубо положительные. По сравнению с олимпийским годом разница значительная - сейчас будто бы воспринимают не по рейтингу, а по конкретному прокату. Да, пожалуй, и у Жени Семененко, и у Глеба Лутфуллина (Гришу Федорова не пишу - все же за падение снижают) компы могли бы быть ещё выше, но тут есть риск …
Женя Семененко - буйвол, упрямо прущий к цели, чего бы ему это ни стоило. Больше 100 баллов за короткую наши парни не набирали уже много лет. А Женя вышел и набрал. Просто красавец, других слов не нахожу.
Ну и по параллельно идущим соревнованиям в Батуми отмечу Сашу Плющенко. Что ни говорите, а парень все же молодец - собрал два чистых проката, улучшил собственный результат с Анкары на 10 баллов (181,97, пока шестой…
Максиму Некрасову сняли гипс. По моей информации для РИА Новости Спорт, ребята продолжают подготовку к Мемориала Дениса Тена и не планируют с него сниматься.
Хорошая новость! Скорейшего восстановления, Макс!
@lapidarnst
Дзепка, Плескачева и Лазарев дебютируют по взрослым в Москве!
Друзья, главный турнир осени - чемпионат Москвы - все ближе. Напоминаю, что состав участников в этот раз невероятно крутой. А для некоторых (Лида Плескачева, София Дзепка, Лева Лазарев aka Сианьская Креветка) этот старт станет началом большого пути на взрослом уровне.
Практически все звёзды нашего фигурного катания соберутся на "Навка-Арене" - не хватает…
🔥 РОЗЫГРЫШ БИЛЕТОВ НА ШОУ ЕВГЕНИИ МЕДВЕДЕВОЙ! Не упусти возможность попасть на главное ледовое шоу осени 💯
2 октября Женя Медведева приглашает всех на дискотеку
90-х на льду 🕺🏻 Это точно нельзя пропустить! И у Вас есть отличная возможность окунуться в эту незабываемую атмосферу 🪩
🏆 Три победителя получат по билету на это яркое шоу!
❗️Что для этого нужно ? Всё очень просто:
✅ Подпишись на канал @lapidarnst
✅ Подп…
Максиму Некрасову вчера наложили гипс. Он будет носить его до среды, после чего перейдет на лангетку. Изначальный диагноз - вывих - подтверждён, перелома нет.
Комментарий Алексея Горшкова:
Изначальный диагноз подтвердился - у Максима вывих, перелома нет. Ему уже наложили гипс, он будет носить его несколько дней, после чего перейдет на лангетку. Будем надеяться, что планы на сезон никак не изменятся. Будем стараться…
Кажется, Александра Бойкова/Дмитрий Козловский выигрывают эти контрольные прокаты. Не в парах, а вообще.
Стоячие овации после произволки совершенно заслуженные. Квад выброс - просто великий!
@lapidarnst
Showing the 12 most recent of 294 posts we hold for @lapidarnst. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@lapidarnst edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 46 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
LESIK. Фигурное катание и ещё немного спорта @kostyalesik · 33,194 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
Матч! Фигурное катание @figurka_match · 53,036 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
Фигурное катание на Первом ⛸ @figureskating_1tv · 69,691 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
Фигурное катание ⛸ @figureskatingfan · 100,329 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 August 2026
Фигурка @figurka24 · 44,910 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
figurexing | фигурексинг 🥵 @figurexing · 36,689 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Федерация фигурного катания на коньках России @ruskating · 24,884 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
Okko Фигурное катание @okkoskating · 43,731 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
⛸ Ход коньком / Фигурное катание @SkateGambit · 79,366 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
Alexandra Trusova @avtrusovaofficial · 233,894 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 August 2026
Πέτρ Гуменник @I2358 · 63,776 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
Evgenia Medvedeva @jmedvedevaj_official · 70,060 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
Kamila Valieva @kamilavalieva26official · 148,875 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
Tuktik_Elizaveta Tuktamysheva @Tuktik_liza · 34,629 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
Team Ignatova (Trusova) Official @team_trusova_official · 24,435 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 September 2026
Обсудим? | Фигурное катание @obsudiim_fk · 29,033 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 September 2026
Anna Shcherbakova @shch_anna · 123,900 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
Алина Загитова @azagitova_official · 87,162 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 September 2026
Lena Krupina | Художественная гимнастика @lenakrupina · 42,264 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
Роман Костомаров @kostomarovroman · 34,478 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
РИА Новости Спорт @sportrian · 42,054 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лапидарность | Влад Жуков” (@lapidarnst), 43,754 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lapidarnst.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.