Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net +1,555. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,044–19,607 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 03:01
18,895
+9
8 Nov 2026, 14:04
18,886
+12
7 Nov 2026, 06:37
18,874
+1
6 Nov 2026, 08:00
18,873
-9
5 Nov 2026, 07:29
18,882
-1
4 Nov 2026, 05:57
18,883
-15
3 Nov 2026, 07:29
18,898
-17
2 Nov 2026, 05:50
18,915
-24
1 Nov 2026, 02:37
18,939
-37
31 Oct 2026, 03:28
18,976
-14
30 Oct 2026, 01:51
18,990
-12
29 Oct 2026, 00:05
19,002
-21
27 Oct 2026, 22:38
19,023
-46
26 Oct 2026, 19:26
19,069
-105
25 Oct 2026, 16:09
19,174
-61
24 Oct 2026, 16:56
19,235
-76
23 Oct 2026, 17:37
19,311
+52
22 Oct 2026, 20:17
19,259
+434
21 Oct 2026, 19:47
18,825
-14
20 Oct 2026, 18:19
18,839
first reading
Engagement
169 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
35.1%
avg views ÷ 18,895 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,640
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
53
of 169 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
169 (22 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
351,870
Reactions total
16,086
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 04:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈10,400
Videos
≈1,040
Links
≈2,030
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 21s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
61,849 reactions across 169 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
29,661
48.0%
🔥
10,942
17.7%
🙏
4,996
8.08%
👍
4,362
7.05%
🤯
3,434
5.55%
😁
2,425
3.92%
❤🔥
2,327
3.76%
💘
707
1.14%
💔
610
0.986%
😭
583
0.943%
🤬
459
0.742%
😍
391
0.632%
🤔
339
0.548%
🏆
285
0.461%
🥰
112
0.181%
💅
99
0.16%
😴
54
0.087%
💯
47
0.076%
😎
16
0.026%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 169 of the 169 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61,849 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 169 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 53 posts held from the last 30 days (5.66%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Арсений Федотов из-за травмы пропустил этап в Екатеринбурге, рассказала Татьяна Мишина
«Произошла травма. На четверном лутце он неудачно приземлился, рано раскрылся и подвернул стопу. Решили не рисковать, но будет видно, как до Омска. Хочется, конечно, чтобы травма полностью прошла, чтобы она не потянулась на сезон. Настрой у него был боевой, старт в Петербурге его окрылил. Надеемся, что все будет хорошо»
@quadbiel…
Камилла Нелюбова: «В данный момент впечатления смешанные. Я бы хотела забыть ошибку, которая случилась на первом прыжковом элементе. Но в остальном рада, что докатала программу чисто, уверенно. Не отпустила ничего. Очень неприятная ошибка случилась для меня, сколько акселей я прыгаю, и вот именно сейчас случилось. Пусть будет уже заключительная ошибка на этом прыжковом элементе»
@quadbiellmann
Аделия Петросян: «После Олимпиады не слишком проще выступать, чем до Олимпиады. Поэтому опыт опытом, но переживания, волнения ничуть не меньше. Как буду настраиваться на этапы Гран-при ISU? Не знаю, буду все решать уже пошагово, как будет перелет. Я даже не знаю, как лучше, загоняться или не загоняться, думать или нет о том, как будет происходить дальнейшее мое путешествие. Там уже надо прям делать, поэтому буду наст…
Аделия Петросян: «Я всегда шла на самый максимальный для себя контент все эти годы. Сейчас не исключение, я хотела начать пробовать тулуп, на тренировках получался - и отдельно, и в целых прокатах. Мне кажется, это нормально для первого старта, с учетом того, какие еще были дни. И с учетом того, что я еще не уверена в себе»
@quadbiellmann
Аделия Петросян поедет еще раз в Казахстан для получения визы в США
«Просто забрали паспорт, сказали, что одобрена, но ее еще не вклеили. Еще раз ехать надо будет в Казахстан? Да»
@quadbiellmann
🥈Владислав Дикиджи с серебром этапа Гран-при в Китае
🥉Евгений Семененко - с бронзой
@quadbiellmann
❤314🔥109🤬22❤🔥9🤯5👍4💘3💔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 169 posts we hold for @quadbiellmann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@quadbiellmann edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @quadbiellmann as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
30 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
38 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 53 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 64 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Обсудим? | Фигурное катание @obsudiim_fk · 35,171 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 September 2026
Best Gumennik | Official Fan Club @best_gumennik · 20,551 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
Матч! Фигурное катание @figurka_match · 53,595 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
Невская фигурка @nevskayafigurka · 20,366 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 October 2026
Федерация фигурного катания на коньках России @ruskating · 26,628 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
Влад Жуков | Лапидарность @lapidarnst · 43,783 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 August 2026
Okko Фигурное катание @okkoskating · 45,704 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
⛸ Ход коньком / Фигурное катание @SkateGambit · 82,079 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
figurexing | фигурексинг 🥵 @figurexing · 38,026 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Фигурное катание ⛸ @figureskatingfan · 103,111 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 August 2026
Московский спорт @MoscowSportOfficial · 45,026 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
Team Ignatova (Trusova) Official @team_trusova_official · 24,995 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 September 2026
Πέτρ Гуменник @I2358 · 61,609 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
Evgenia Medvedeva @jmedvedevaj_official · 70,211 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
Tuktik_Elizaveta Tuktamysheva @Tuktik_liza · 34,418 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
Олимпийский комитет России @olympic_russia · 29,399 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
Роман Костомаров @kostomarovroman · 34,137 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
Anna Shcherbakova @shch_anna · 123,613 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
LESIK. Фигурное катание и ещё немного спорта @kostyalesik · 39,178 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
Тулуп Тутберидзе @tuluptut · 37,823 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Алина Загитова @azagitova_official · 86,647 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 September 2026
РИА Новости Спорт @sportrian · 41,534 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 August 2026
Фигурное катание на Первом ⛸ @figureskating_1tv · 71,854 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
Арзамасова Лиза @LizaArzamasova · 22,968 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Четверной бильман” (@quadbiellmann), 18,895 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quadbiellmann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.