Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Софья Акатьева

Channel

Софья Акатьева

@sofya_akatyeva

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

12,996subscribers

-131 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001582842472
TypeChannel
Username@sofya_akatyeva
Description№ 5449582565
Created28 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sofya_akatyeva

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,96513,13813,051.57 August 2026 — 13,127 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,128 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,130 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,138 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,124 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,115 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,116 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,115 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,108 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,101 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,088 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,081 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,075 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,081 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,077 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,080 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,089 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,090 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,092 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,087 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,092 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,084 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,082 subscribers6 September 2026 — 13,085 subscribers10 September 2026 — 13,086 subscribers12 September 2026 — 13,084 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,077 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,092 subscribers29 September 2026 — 13,053 subscribers5 October 2026 — 13,045 subscribers9 October 2026 — 13,036 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,027 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,026 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,023 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,016 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,013 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,009 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,013 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,010 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,003 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,000 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,984 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,987 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,981 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,973 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,967 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,973 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,971 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,969 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,965 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,979 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,974 subscribers7 November 2026 — 12,983 subscribers9 November 2026 — 12,977 subscribers11 November 2026 — 12,996 subscribers12,9967 August 202611 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 96 days, net -131. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,939–13,164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 07:0712,996+19
9 Nov 2026, 10:1812,977-6
7 Nov 2026, 23:0912,983+9
5 Nov 2026, 19:0012,974-5
4 Nov 2026, 17:4912,979+14
3 Nov 2026, 14:3812,965-4
2 Nov 2026, 15:1512,969-2
1 Nov 2026, 13:1612,971-2
31 Oct 2026, 16:2112,973+6
30 Oct 2026, 16:4612,967-6
29 Oct 2026, 19:3712,973-8
28 Oct 2026, 16:5512,981-6
26 Oct 2026, 13:5412,987+3
25 Oct 2026, 16:3712,984-16
24 Oct 2026, 17:2713,000-3
23 Oct 2026, 18:3913,003-7
22 Oct 2026, 15:0613,010-3
20 Oct 2026, 06:2613,013+4
19 Oct 2026, 06:3513,009-4
18 Oct 2026, 04:2713,013first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
82.7%
avg views ÷ 12,996 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,700
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held28 (26 June 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total42,990
Reactions total4,375
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 08:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
483
Videos
94
Links
23

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

28,219 reactions across 28 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥20,53672.8%
custom 53710377353037903274,78517.0%
💔1,6785.95%
custom 52717724511586575199043.20%
😭3161.12%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,219 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
692
across the posts below
Posts paid on
28
of 28 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
137
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sofya_akatyeva. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 14:34 UTC≈8,480 views817 reactions20 Starsread 12 November 2026
Video

⛸️❣️

❤‍🔥678custom 527177245115865751991💔46😭2

8 Nov 2026, 10:12 UTC≈8,510 views1,042 reactions20 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🖤💭

❤‍🔥818custom 5271772451158657519136💔81😭7

27 Oct 2026, 17:19 UTC≈15,300 views1,302 reactions6 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

😳

❤‍🔥1,030💔141custom 5271772451158657519130😭1

25 Oct 2026, 10:06 UTC≈10,700 views1,214 reactions6 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

👤

❤‍🔥958custom 5271772451158657519169💔81😭6

5 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC≈13,700 views1,102 reactions14 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🖤

❤‍🔥908💔121😭61custom 527177245115865751912

26 Sept 2026, 19:39 UTC≈13,700 views1,186 reactions12 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🐾

❤‍🔥918custom 5271772451158657519183💔81😭4

22 Sept 2026, 16:30 UTC≈12,000 views518 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @okkoskatingPhoto

🫶 Соскучились по Софье Акатьевой? Соня сняла для вас влог из Екатеринбурга, куда она приехала в роли спикера Международного фестиваля молодежи. Переходи по ссылке, чтобы увидеть один день из жизни спортсменки: https://okko.tv/s/12na 😃

❤‍🔥439💔38custom 527177245115865751936😭5

3 Sept 2026, 12:06 UTC≈18,500 views1,162 reactions26 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

😉

❤‍🔥945custom 5271772451158657519147💔67😭3

29 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC≈16,500 views695 reactions5 Starsread 12 November 2026

Спасибо всем, кто пришёл, надеюсь, вам понравилось и вы научились чему-то новому ❤️

❤‍🔥537custom 5371037735303790327126😭32

29 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC≈15,400 views527 reactions6 Starsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @MariiaKuptsovaVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥411custom 537103773530379032791💔25

29 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC≈17,200 views625 reactions5 Starsread 12 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥484custom 5371037735303790327107💔32😭2

21 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC≈19,100 views1,218 reactions21 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

floral makeup🐕🐕

❤‍🔥941custom 5371037735303790327195💔77😭5

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @sofya_akatyeva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tuktik_Elizaveta Tuktamysheva
@Tuktik_liza · 34,418
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
Алина Загитова
@azagitova_official · 86,647
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 September 2026
Влад Жуков | Лапидарность
@lapidarnst · 43,774
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 August 2026
Okko Фигурное катание
@okkoskating · 45,830
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Федерация фигурного катания на коньках России
@ruskating · 26,818
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
Фигурка
@figurka24 · 49,836
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Роман Костомаров
@kostomarovroman · 34,137
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
Матч! Фигурное катание
@figurka_match · 53,592
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
Team Ignatova (Trusova) Official
@team_trusova_official · 24,995
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q105711002 on Wikidata, read 8 November 2026
LabelSofia Akatyeva
DescriptionRussian figure skater

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Софья Акатьева” (@sofya_akatyeva), 12,996 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sofya_akatyeva.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.