6 measurements spanning 6 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,387–14,411 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 22:57
14,390
-8
9 Aug 2026, 17:22
14,398
-2
8 Aug 2026, 16:32
14,400
-2
7 Aug 2026, 19:01
14,402
-4
6 Aug 2026, 16:02
14,406
-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:46
14,408
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
82.3%
avg views ÷ 14,390 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,800
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held
15 (28 May 2026 – 20 July 2026)
Views total
35,540
Reactions total
1,339
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 01:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
861
Videos
223
Links
718
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
7,402 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,301
58.1%
👍
895
12.1%
🤯
762
10.3%
💔
718
9.70%
🔥
352
4.76%
😁
201
2.72%
😭
117
1.58%
👎
39
0.527%
🐳
17
0.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,402reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 15 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @biellmann. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 20 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
6.67%
1 of 15 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
9,840
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
17,700
over 14 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFK67ZcM
1
20 July 2026
20 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 20 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Прогнозы в фигурном катании – неблагодарное дело, но чем еще заниматься, пока весь трансфер Петросян (хотя трансфер ли это? Или просто уход в никуда?) укладывается в десять строчек поста с благодарностями в соцсетях Аделии?
Версия 1. Петросян выбрала учебу. Давайте прямо – хорошие перспективы в нашем фигурном катании на образование не меняют. Даже на престижное, сложное и не по спортивному профилю. Петросян числится…
Энтони Хопкинс – человек-оркестр. В 88 лет он решил, что ему мало «Оскара» за Ганнибала Лектора, поэтому уже через месяц выходит его альбом «Life Is a Dream», над которым он работал с середины прошлого века. Музыка пришла в жизнь Энтони раньше кино, хотя известность ему принесло именно последнее.
Но поклонники фигурного катания знали о неочевидном таланте Хопкинса и раньше. Его композиция «And the Waltz Goes On» – н…
Новость про то, что ISU одобрил нейтральный статус для пяти российских фигуристов – очень показательный пример того, как создать громкий инфоповод из ничего.
В 11:25 фамилии Фроловой, Двоеглазовой, Федорова, Петросян и Горбачевой появились на сайте ТАСС. Источник – сайт ISU, тот самый, по которому уже безуспешно месяц назад пытались предсказать допуск юниоров почему-то по фамилиям добавленных туда новисов.
В 11:33 …
После негативной реакции литовской федерации на возвращение российских фигуристов задалась вопросом о том, есть ли у членов ISU какие-то лазейки, чтобы игнорировать решение Совета и продолжать не пускать наших спортсменов на соревнования – даже в нейтральном статусе. Это важно, поскольку именно Литва примет ЮЧМ в 2028 году, да и пару Челленджеров проводят крайне нелояльные к нам страны.
В соответствии с Конституцией…
В первый год после разбана главной площадкой для россиян станут Челленджеры. И их надо использовать на все 100% – тем более, количество турниров очень удачно увеличилось со следующего сезона.
Во-первых, это самый быстрый способ проверить себя на нейтральность. Чем раньше наши топы поймут, насколько они соответствуют критериям ISU, тем лучше. Особенно критично оперативно начать сезон тем, чья нейтральность может вызв…
Прежде всего, поздравляю всех с тем, что допуск состоялся. Да, не такой лояльный как в некоторых других видах, где россиян вернули с флагом, не такой своевременный, как мог бы быть, и с рядом ограничений. Некоторые из них – например, сокращение фаст-трека для топов, которые возобновляют карьеру после перерыва – были введены в последний момент явно под возвращение наших. Но это куда лучше, чем могло бы быть: честно ск…
Тамаре Николаевне Москвиной сегодня 85. Весной мы с ней записали интервью специально для "Сноба": поговорили о критике и восхищении фанатов, о том, как мотивировать на победу фотографией на бортике, и о шансах увидеть Александра Галлямова на льду под рэп (они есть).
Наверное, главное, что меня восхищает в Москвиной – то, что она не боится пробовать новое в свои годы. Да, это не всегда отражается в программах, но кон…
Раз новостей по допуску пока нет, посмотрим на распределение по этапам Гран-при тех, кому повезло чуть больше.
Главное:
1. Чок / Бейтс, Гиллес / Пуарье и Гиньяр / Фаббри действительно пропускают как минимум половину сезона. Пишу аккуратно, потому что никогда не знаешь, кто вдруг соскучится на пенсии. Рид и Амбрулевичюс завершать, похоже, не планируют (хотя переход от прошлогоднего I am too sexy к новому вальсу буде…
Вижу новость о том, что российских юниоров начали добавлять в базу ISU, а значит, новые члены Совета уже одной ногой слезли с лежаков на Тенерифе и готовы подписывать коммюнике о нашем разбане. Не хочу отнимать надежду (тем более, я сама ее не теряю), но прокомментирую, почему в этом нет никакой сенсации.
Сначала контекст: в базе появились Анна Докукина, Екатерина Корчажникова, Виктория Стрельцова, Елизавета Малеина…
В качестве разогрева перед Конгрессом ISU рекомендую серию интервью Анны Келлар с кандидитами в совет ISU. Послушала прицельно, что они говорят по поводу нашего потенциального разбана (перевод не дословный и с сокращениями, но все аргументы переданы).
Тацуро Мацумура (Япония): большинство скажет, что это зависит от решений МОК. У меня много российских друзей. Мне они нравятся. Поэтому я хотел бы их возвращения. Но в…
На фоне вчерашнего финала «Ролан Гаррос» (поздравляем Мирру Андрееву!) задумалась о том, сколько турниров должен выиграть фигурист, чтобы заработать сопоставимые призовые – 2,8 млн евро (238 млн рублей или 3,27 млн долларов).
Чемпион международного этапа Гран-при получает 18000 долларов, в финале – 25000. Итого за серию максимум можно заработать 61000 – чтобы догнать Мирру, понадобится чуть больше 50 лет.
Победа на …
Пользовательница Х сделала очень крутую аналитику того, как долго топам в мужском катании удавалось оставаться на пике. Для этого она проанализировала результаты после введения новой системы судейства и выбрала 10 наивысших оценок на международных взрослых и юниорских турнирах за каждый соревновательный год.
Желтым выделены фигуристы с самым высоким результатом сезона, серым – те, чьи баллы оказались на втором месте…
❤311🔥73😁38👍8
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @biellmann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 491,155 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лутц с полубильмана” (@biellmann), 14,390 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/biellmann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
