Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

КрасноBY

@krasnoby

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,009subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001620523728
TypeChannel
Username@krasnoby
Created19 February 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/krasnoby

Growth

8,0068,0128,0096 August 2026 — 8,008 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,008 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,006 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,012 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,009 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,005–8,013 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:488,009-3
10 Aug 2026, 01:428,012+6
6 Aug 2026, 17:108,006-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:198,008no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:598,008first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 11 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.1%
avg views ÷ 8,009 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,370
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held21 (11 June 2025 – 9 August 2026)
Views total10,110
Reactions total259
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

5,246 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54539870185120307631,57530.0%
🤣1,31525.1%
👎95918.3%
custom 545389521358607814958011.1%
👍3897.42%
🤡2023.85%
❤‍🔥1001.91%
🤬320.61%
🫡290.553%
🥱270.515%
⚡190.362%
🤯190.362%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,246reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2025 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC≈1,480 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ Предлагаем вниманию читателей перевод статьи шотландского этика добродетели Аласдера Макинтайра «Заметки из нравственной глуши» (Notes from the Moral Wilderness). Макинтайр разбирает два зеркальных типажа: «Сталиниста» и «Морального критика» сталинизма (как правило — бывшего сталиниста). Первый растворяет мораль в исторической необходимости: должное полностью поглощается «объективным» ходом вещей. Вт…

custom 545398701851203076343custom 54538952135860781495

30 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTC≈2,660 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @lenin_crewPhoto

🔸СССР, СЭВ, ГЛОБАЛЬНЫЙ ЮГ: ДИАЛЕКТИКА ИНТЕГРАЦИИ Дорогие друзья! Сегодня в качестве пилотного проекта мы анонсируем одну из наших наиболее амбициозных работ, нацеленную на марксистский анализ народного хозяйства СССР на базе серии исследований и наших оригинальных концепций монополистических пластов экономики и сложного труда. Мы работаем над масштабной задачей — исследованием социалистического строительства в XX …

custom 545398701851203076353custom 54538952135860781497

21 Jul 2026, 19:23 UTC≈5,970 views151 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📝📝📝📝📝 Мы узнали, что Антон Бархатков, как минимум с сентября 2025-го, читал курс политэкономии в Школе Компартии Беларуси и на днях, по его завершении, даже получил поощрительную грамоту! Надеемся, что только грамоту, без «котлеты». Сомневаемся, что преподавательская деятельность Антона зависела от участия в организации, в которой член ЦК и заведующий отделом теории и практики социализма (!) заявляет, что «для успе…

custom 545398701851203076395custom 545389521358607814956

8 Jul 2026, 17:48 UTC≈5,560 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📄📄📄📄 Маркс не оставил систематического изложения собственной онтологии, а его философские работы раннего периода фрагментарны и полемичны. Ядро новой концепции осталось «похоронено» в корпусе политико-экономических текстов, поэтому задача его реконструкции легла на следующие поколения. Отсутствие целостной философской системы породило иллюзию, что марксизм совместим с любой онтологией, а диалектику можно ограничить…

custom 545398701851203076344

3 Jun 2026, 18:29 UTC≈7,400 views69 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ 💬Миф о материализме Маркса💬 Джордж Л. Клайн Предлагаем вниманию читателей перевод статьи известного американского историка философии и советолога Джорджа Л. Клайна. Работа представляет собой одну из заметных в западной литературе попыток пересмотреть устоявшееся представление о философских основаниях мысли Маркса. Автор стремится доказать, что приписывание Марксу материалистической онтологии являетс…

custom 545398701851203076356custom 545389521358607814913

14 May 2026, 17:25 UTC≈8,500 views107 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ К. Маркс 💬Экономическо-философские рукописи 1844 года. Новый русский перевод💬 Эту работу раннего Маркса в СССР переводили дважды (1956, 1974). Каждая из этих попыток активно осмыслялась в работах отечественных и зарубежных марксоведов, философов и политэкономов. В 2017 году под эгидой издательства Эксмо вышла новая версия перевода, преимуществом которой была новая сверка текста двух русских переводов…

custom 5453987018512030763105custom 54538952135860781492

27 Apr 2026, 17:58 UTC≈7,340 views70 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ Двухтомник «Политическая экономия современного монополистического капитализма» (1971, ИМЭМО АН СССР, под ред. Н. Н. Иноземцева, С. М. Меньшикова, А. Г. Милейковского, А. М. Румянцева). Предлагаем вашему вниманию работу, дающую представление о подходе советской экономической школы к исследованию империализма на этапе его перерастания в государственно-монополистический капитализм. Из аннотации: Излож…

custom 545398701851203076368custom 54538952135860781492

2 Apr 2026, 06:22 UTC≈9,870 views68 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📄📄📄📄 Становление науки этнографии. Часть 2: от Ломоносова до Русского географического общества XIX век — время бурного укрепления Российской империи, военных и культурных экспансий, активных путешествий и научного прогресса. События эпохи, начиная с Отечественной войны 1812 года, русских военных походов в Европу, Турцию, Иран и Кавказ приводят не только к расширению территорий, но и к внутреннему политическому напр…

custom 545398701851203076364custom 54538952135860781494

14 Feb 2026, 09:33 UTC≈13,400 views96 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📹📹📹📹 📕🎧 Публикуем аудиоверсию второй книги третьего издания философской монографии Семёнова Ю. И. «Введение в науку философии». 💬Великие открытия философии: проблема природы знания и познания💬 Аннотация: Вторая книга посвящена проблеме природы знания и познания, раскрывает вопрос о природе идеального и психофизиологическую проблему в истории философской и естественно-научной мысли. Πο мнению автора, мир существуе…

custom 545398701851203076390custom 54538952135860781496

31 Dec 2025, 10:41 UTC≈12,300 views88 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ Публикуем библиографию печатных работ Юрия Ивановича Семёнова, собранных в нашей цифровой библиотеке. Все его крупные обобщающие монографии доступны в последних изданиях — в формате PDF с распознанным текстом. Некоторые работы мы отсканировали сами, другие нашли благодаря наводкам каналов «Студент-психолог», «Диалектика по Пацански» и почившего журнала «Скепсис». ❗️ Если в ваших личных библиотеках е…

custom 545398701851203076384custom 54538952135860781494

31 Dec 2025, 06:30 UTC≈9,650 views93 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ 📕 Семёнов Юрий Иванович 💬 Происхождение брака и семьи, 2025💬 Публикуем качественный скан одной из самых знаменитых монографий Ю. И. Семёнова. В работе предпринята попытка ёмко объяснить эволюцию института брака и семьи на основе богатой эмпирики, накопленной различными науками. Хотя текст вышел в 1974 году, а за полвека этнография, антропология и прикладная социология пополнились огромным количеств…

custom 545398701851203076393

7 Dec 2025, 13:40 UTC≈9,150 views91 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📄📄📄📄 Становление науки этнографии. Часть 1: от «Повести временных лет» до Ломоносова» Формирование теории наций и практики решения национального вопроса в Советском Союзе представляло собой одну из наиболее сложных политических проблем социалистического строительства. Однако истоки политических решений и их последствия невозможно понять в отрыве от долгого и сложного процесса осмысления этнического многообразия на …

custom 545398701851203076389custom 54538952135860781492

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @krasnoby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 346,792 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Вектор Live
@vector_comrade · 1,0913 postsКоммунист из Казахстана
@commyfromkazakhstan · 81 postRe y compañeros
@companeros · 1,0661 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Lenin Crew
@lenin_crew · 9,4542 posts

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Re y compañeros
@companeros · 1,0661 postОружие Критики
@Die_Waffe_Der_Kritik · 7621 postНаступны прыпынак
@next_stop_by · 1241 postПетровский. Власть
@piatrouski · 1,0821 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Оружие Критики
@Die_Waffe_Der_Kritik · 7622 postsLenin Crew
@lenin_crew · 9,4542 postsСтудент-психолог
@abitofbothpsy · 2301 postRe y compañeros
@companeros · 1,0661 postДаниил Тяжкун
@d_tyazhkun · 2,0481 postДиалектика по-пацански
@dialektika123 · 2,1411 postКомпартия ☭ Беларуси🇧🇾
@kom_party_belarus · 2,0371 postPoligraf.RED
@poligraf_red · 2,5601 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КрасноBY” (@krasnoby), 8,009 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krasnoby.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.