Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

kober.shit

@kobershit

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,016subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002225001611
TypeChannel
Username@kobershit
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kobershit

Growth

1,0161,0171,016.56 Aug 2026, 17:32 — 1,017 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:24 — 1,016 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 17:327 Aug 2026, 16:24
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,016–1,017 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 16:241,016-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:321,017first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

396 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16040.4%
❤‍🔥10526.5%
🏆7619.2%
👍276.82%
🔥112.78%
🐳61.52%
😢41.01%
🍓20.505%
😁20.505%
😈20.505%
10.253%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 396reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2025 to 16 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
341
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 20 we hold a reading for · 80%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kobershit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 January 2025 to 16 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2025, 15:06 UTC≈2,260 views35 reactions90 Starsread 6 August 2026

Несмотря на то, что практически ничего не пишу в каналы, остаюсь активным внутри своего чата, постоянно описывая там свои идеи и мысли. Хочу чуть более подробно раскрыть тему ИИ проектов, которых выбрал для отработки. — Gensyn Хороший пост о проекте с гайдом на ноду + еще гайд. Если не хотите разбираться с установкой ноды, то можете сделать это через @gemvisi0n. — Nous Research Почитать о проекте можете тут. Купил

👍15🏆12❤‍🔥71

19 May 2025, 21:26 UTC≈2,420 views16 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Реварды за Lomabrd + Bera / Ethereal / Sahara AI Кстати, если вы, как и я, фармили Lombard в связке с Bera через Pendle, то можете забрать свой ревард в токена $BERA тут. Ставка отыграла себя не так, как я задумывал. На 30$ сожженных в пендл получилось 6-7$ реварда в $BERA + примерное 10к поинтов в Lombard. Посмотри, как раздаст Lombard, но учитывая как выходят проекты из BTC-экосистемы, в хорошую насыпку не особо

❤‍🔥9🏆52

18 May 2025, 18:01 UTC≈2,150 views37 reactions8 Starsread 6 August 2026

OpenSea Abstract Решил не дожидаться намеков на бокс от OS и начал крутить новую сеть. Сделал: — Дешевые минты (1, 2, 3, 4) — Свапы — Взял в холд самую дешевую коллекцию с галочкой (даже если покупаете одну нфт, то я бы советовал делать через функцию Sweep) Небольшой объем набил только на мейн кошельках, на остальной ферме буду делать, если OS дадут намек на дроп бокса за abstract. Знакомый закинул шизоидею: прого

22🏆8❤‍🔥7

11 May 2025, 20:17 UTC≈2,150 views25 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Информация в добавок к последнему посту про Farcaster Мой друг дропнул пост про метку спамера в Farcaster, советую ознакомится: https://t.me/gambling116/61 https://t.me/gambling116/61 https://t.me/gambling116/61 Вот еще дополнительно информации от него. Именно поэтому стараюсь более безопасно обращаться со своими аккуантами. Например, я пищу посты не через GPT API, а беру посты разных типов из твитера и дропаю их

❤‍🔥174🏆4

7 May 2025, 22:29 UTC≈2,690 views22 reactions6 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

UniSat чуть чуть обновили поинтовую систему, но фарм через фрактал все равно сейчас стоит копейки (1 поинт = 0.05$). Я не спеша набивал аккаунты с 500+ поинтами, в последние дни цена такого аккаунта выходила в районе 13$. Скорее всего временно перестану фармить поинты, подожду какое-то время, пока цена на $FB опустится еще пониже и снова возобновлю фарм. Чуть подробнее про обновление можете почитать тут: https://t

11🏆5🐳5👍1

7 May 2025, 18:45 UTC≈2,410 views34 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026

Мысли по поводу выхода Polymarket Для тех кто не знает, в данный момент идет разработка нового оракула для рынка предсказаний, разработкой занимаются: Polymarket, EigenLayer и UMA. Одна из основных особенностей данного оракула — Возможность использования разных токенов для разрешения споров. Думаю, многие слышали о ситуациях, когда решения UMA относительно исходов некоторых событий на Polymarket выглядели, мягко г

❤‍🔥22🏆63🍓1🐳1🔥1

1 May 2025, 20:36 UTC≈1,760 views9 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Если депали в Ethereal, то можете заклеймить дроп от Ethena https://ethena.liquifi.finance/ https://ethena.liquifi.finance/ https://ethena.liquifi.finance/

5🏆3❤‍🔥1

27 Apr 2025, 13:16 UTC≈2,010 views31 reactions36 Starsread 6 August 2026

OpenSea Одна из самых очевидных активности на текущем рынке, даже легенда без кепки вышел из спячки, чтобы вам об этом сказать. Продолжаю активно следить за намеками со стороны команды, сейчас из очевидного что нужно сделать: — Sweeps (намек раз, намек 2) — Cross-chain Purchasing (намек) (разные дни / разные сети) — Cross-chain Mint (намек) (разные дни / в разные сети) Менее перспективные активности, но которые я

17👍7🏆4❤‍🔥2🍓1

12 Mar 2025, 11:50 UTC≈2,190 views22 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Команда работает над системой поинтов, обещают не обижать пользователей кто фармил поинты в BTC

❤‍🔥126🏆4

10 Mar 2025, 19:03 UTC≈3,210 views23 reactions4 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

UniSat поинты в битке объединили с поинтами во фрактале... Если для команды теперь не важно где вы фармите поинты (поинты в битке равносильны поинтам в фрактале), то в данный момент фарм поинтов обходится примерно в 0.05$ за поинт, а летом мы фармили эти поинты в расчете на 1 поинт = 1$ Для тех тех кто фармил проект до этого момента — новость неприятная. Надежда лишь на то, что команда сделала снеп (не особо в это

16😢4❤‍🔥2🏆1

3 Mar 2025, 17:45 UTC≈2,670 views19 reactions12 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

КЛЯНИСЬ. https://x.com/zora/status/1896616047656280324

❤‍🔥95🏆3🔥1😁1

25 Feb 2025, 09:00 UTC≈1,760 views10 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

— Насыпят тем кто депал напрямую в Babylon. — Отдельно за Pioneer Pass NFT сыпать не будут, это дополнительный мультипликатор, если покупали онли нфт, но не депали в Babylon, то дроп вы не получите. — Other Airdrops: Wallet campaigns including (Unisat Wallet). По идеи могут насыпать за наши Unisat поинты, но пока что нет точных критериев. — Если вы депали $BTC через LST протоколы (Lombard, Solv и тд), то ждите нов

7❤‍🔥1🏆1😈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kobershit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 832,111 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“kober.shit” (@kobershit), 1,016 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kobershit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.