Posted without readable text

Channel
Как Лёха-дизайнер кнопки рисовал и старался не уехать кукухой
@kmsbanyds
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
198subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003823542957 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kmsbanyds |
| Description | Я Лёха, дизайнер дизайн-систем. Успел поработать в таких компаниях, как Tutu, Самокат, Почтатех и Chat2desk. Тут собираюсь рассказывать всякое про карьеру, про кнопки, репостить видосы которые я собираюсь заливать на YouTube (в 2026 году, ага) |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 19 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kmsbanyds |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 198 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 198 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 85.7%
- avg views ÷ 198 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 170
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 9.10%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (19 May 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 848 |
| Reactions total | 67 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 25
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 14
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 43s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
299 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 128 | 42.8% | |
| 🔥 | 77 | 25.8% | |
| 😁 | 25 | 8.36% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 5.35% | |
| 💅 | 12 | 4.01% | |
| 😱 | 10 | 3.34% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 2.68% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 2.01% | |
| 🦄 | 5 | 1.67% | |
| 👨💻 | 4 | 1.34% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.00% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 1.00% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 0.669% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 299reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
🤔2😁1
Последние года 2–3, если не больше, я страдаю от переключения клавиатуры на Маке: я вроде переключил, проверил, начинаю печатать — не тот язык... Я уже отчаялся, думал, что это баг и всё такое (мне кажется, у меня пара сотен тысяч нервных клеток от этого бага отъебнула, сто проц). И вот я, кажется, нашёл нативное решение! Кажется, это вот эта дремучая галка! (Спасибо шортсам, не зря деградировал всё это время). Тес…
❤12😱5👨💻4
Posted without readable text
🔥12
Как вы знаете, сейчас нахожусь в поиске новой работы (да, до сих пор, привет — вот этот пост). Какой рынок сейчас, думаю, всем понятно, но у меня есть ещё утяжелители: 1. Дизайнер DesignOps — в целом фрукт редкий, и вакансий таких, ну, 1 на сотню вакансий продуктового дизайнера. 2. Я живу не в РФ, и мой «инглиш из вэри бэд». (Я работаю над этим прямо сейчас) 3. Есть блэклист компаний, где бы я не хотел работать. Но…
❤14😁12🔥3❤🔥2
Простите
😁12
Совсем забыл рассказать! Я начал менторить на https://t.me/duosapiens (Это сервис для длительных сессий менторинга) Буду делиться опытом, как я (пока еще не свистанув флягой) разрабатывал разные дизайн-системы. Буду показывать и рассказывать, какую каку я делал и почему это «кака», ну и вообще много всего про ДСки, DesignOps и про стулья — как сесть на оба так, чтобы и не прилетело в щель между ними (ну или прилетел…
❤17💅7🔥4
Я тут подумал: может, мне аватарку сменить (вот ту, которая оберег от ханжей)? Взял снимок, который я сделал в 5 утра после монтажа моего последнего видео, и думаю — дай попрошу ИИ обработать. Запрос был: «Сделай качество лучше, убери синяки под глазами». Использовал бесплатные модели, так как я мотал на бую покупать 10 подписок ради прикола (все таки я 3-й месяц как безработный (поздравьте меня лукасом, христа ради)…
❤26👍5🔥2
А вы заметили обновление телеги? Раньше, реакции приходилось прокручивать справа на лево бесконечной строкой, теперь как резина тянется и хуякс! Вываливается список с приятным хаптиком. Милота как по мне. Еще если голосовушку или кружочек к замочек потянуть во время записи, он тоже тянется приятно☺️
🦄5🔥1
Написал тут мини-статью, делюсь! А что еще делать в затяжном «отпуске» :D https://habr.com/p/1050662/
❤11
Недавно ко мне пришли с запросом поделиться портфолио дизайнеров ДС как референсом (Привет @bibickl_dsgn), и я понял, что таких не встречал))). Сам делал своё портфолио по наитию, по принципу «прогрессивного джипега». Т. е. сначала сделать какую-то сырую версию, затем улучшать, допиливать и т. д. Сами знаете, какие времена сейчас: раньше я просто показывал экран на тех. собесе и рассказывал какие-то интересные кейсы …
👍9🤔5❤4
Написал тут статью на vc про эволюцию системы токенов цветов в tutu.ru, точнее — пересказ со старого видео, чтобы потестить площадку и всё такое. Там мы с @malamuth рассказываем, как мы всё это вертели-крутили. И мне очень нравится это видео, потому что там мы рассказываем не стройную картину мира, типа мы сделали вундервафлю, которая вообще ультимативная и мы гении, а про то, что можно делать по-разному, и иногда да…
🔥20❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @kmsbanyds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 208,706 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Как Лёха-дизайнер кнопки рисовал и старался не уехать кукухой” (@kmsbanyds), 198 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kmsbanyds.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.