Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

malamuth

@kotmalamuth

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,065subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001545794601
TypeChannel
Username@kotmalamuth
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kotmalamuth

Growth

1,0641,0651,064.57 August 2026 — 1,064 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,064 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,065 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,064–1,065 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:541,065+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:171,064no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:551,064first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 55s
Average length
1m 28s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

418 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥15136.1%
7918.9%
🤣5513.2%
custom 52424857134122993715412.9%
💯163.83%
❤‍🔥153.59%
😁92.15%
🥰81.91%
👏61.44%
51.20%
👍51.20%
🤔51.20%
30.718%
custom 525157664734946929920.478%
👾10.239%
😎10.239%
😱10.239%
🤩10.239%
🤯10.239%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 418reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2025 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kotmalamuth. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 September 2025 to 30 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2026, 10:34 UTC516 views18 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

В продолжение этой истории — agentic-генерация переменных под твой сетап: сколько сайз-классов, платформ, тем и т.д... 10 минут, и готова система, можно мастерить, не отвлекаясь на мелочёвку. Мигрируем на MCP. А дальше двигаемся в сторону генерации компонентов (design+code), и уже дизайн-принципов — самая мякотка и давняя мечта... То, что начиналось, как Starter Kit, потихоньку обретает очень симпатичные мне очерта

🔥114custom 52424857134122993713

27 Jun 2026, 07:44 UTC718 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаю вайбкодить с мамкиными билдерами, и у нас настала пора оптимизаций 😳 Со временем у координатора на долгих и больших проектах появляются навязчивые идеи, бывает он сам хочет поработать руками вместо своих непосредственных обязанностей и всё такое. В общем, засоряется контекст, и координатор, так скажем, выгорает. Что в таких ситуациях происходит в дикой природе? Ага, PIP и/или увольнение. Так у нас появили

🤣195👾1🔥1

26 Jun 2026, 18:25 UTC757 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Оч показательная ситуация. Обсуждали, как экспортируются вариаблы в фигму (как это должно расскладываться по коллекциям, группам и тд). Экспорт влоб, концептуально понятный, как три копейки, который предлагает разработчик, концептуально мне очень нравится, но на практике всё лежит не там, где мне привычно, и у меня начинает подгарать. А кому-то привычно ещё как-то по-другому, ну как же, как же можно так всё раскладыв

💯16custom 52424857134122993714🤔321

17 Jun 2026, 10:17 UTC923 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хаха шах и мат у меня кодекс на мобиле!

🤣18👏5

16 Jun 2026, 10:06 UTC712 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дорогой Лёха тут перенёс наш кейс про цвета в буквы, такой чудесный привет из прошлого без AI и вот этого всего. И вообще, подписывайтесь на Лёху, он очень искренне делится опытом и наблюдениями, любо-дорого читать)

1👍1🥰1

16 Jun 2026, 10:06 UTC823 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kmsbanyds

Написал тут статью на vc про эволюцию системы токенов цветов в tutu.ru, точнее — пересказ со старого видео, чтобы потестить площадку и всё такое. Там мы с @malamuth рассказываем, как мы всё это вертели-крутили. И мне очень нравится это видео, потому что там мы рассказываем не стройную картину мира, типа мы сделали вундервафлю, которая вообще ультимативная и мы гении, а про то, что можно делать по-разному, и иногда да

❤‍🔥11🔥1custom 52424857134122993711

12 Jun 2026, 14:08 UTC924 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Больше всего, конечно же, довольна неймингом

🤣11😁9

12 Jun 2026, 13:43 UTC≈1,000 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Всё, как у людей Меня задолбала свалка, в которую со временем превращаются мои навайбкоженные проекты. Даже, если на первый взгляд всё выглядит, как надо: аккуратные папочки с ассетами, сорцами, тестами и т.д., понимаешь, что внутри куча лишнего, неверно истолкованного, недопровренного, недоделанного, недо-недо-недо, или просто ты не знаешь наверняка, что внутри. Я работаю в Codex (да, я нетакуся, не в Claude). Про

21custom 52424857134122993716👏1🤩1🤯1

16 Apr 2026, 11:30 UTC≈1,260 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Попался интересный видос про файлики с контекстом для моделей (и научные работы о том, что они либо незначительно влияют на аутпут, либо даже портят его, если автогенерятся или обновляются руками). В конце чувак предлагает интересный подход — по сути собирать в AGENTS.md ошибки и трудности, с которыми сталкивается агент, другим агентам на будущее: The role of this file is to describe common mistakes and confusion p

95🔥3👍1

9 Apr 2026, 19:14 UTC≈1,240 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Скоро что-то зарелизим. Пока затравочка про тулинг для работы с китом: • документация с воспроизводимой генерацией из единого источника (для агентов и кожаных) • скилы и скрипты для типовых/запарных сценариев (пример с палеткой — как минимум, как отправная точка для файнтюнинга) • с адаптацией под разные редакторы

custom 524248571341229937114🔥94😱1

7 Apr 2026, 22:30 UTC≈1,150 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

И вообще, чем вот это вот объяснить разрабу, как ты хочешь, чтобы он заверстал, отличается от вайбкодинга? Ну кроме того, что безопасно не следить за речью

🤣7🥰7👍1

7 Apr 2026, 15:34 UTC≈1,310 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Перекличка: как лично у тебя дела с вайбкодом?

  1. Всё пучком, уже куча живых проектов 😎13%
  2. Так, кое-что получилось25%
  3. Пробую19%
  4. Только собираюсь18%
  5. Херня полная ваш вайбкод, ничего не получается4%
  6. Достали своим вайбкодом, власть кожаным!13%
  7. Шо? 😐7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kotmalamuth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Apr 2026, 15:34 UTCAnonymous Poll402 voters

Перекличка: как лично у тебя дела с вайбкодом?

  1. Всё пучком, уже куча живых проектов 😎13%
  2. Так, кое-что получилось25%
  3. Пробую19%
  4. Только собираюсь18%
  5. Херня полная ваш вайбкод, ничего не получается4%
  6. Достали своим вайбкодом, власть кожаным!13%
  7. Шо? 😐7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2025 to 30 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,270,659 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“malamuth” (@kotmalamuth), 1,065 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kotmalamuth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.