Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Кризисный психолог Михаил Хасьминский

@khasminski

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

812subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001727572175
TypeChannel
Username@khasminski
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/khasminski

Growth

8127 Aug 2026, 11:02 — 812 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:44 — 812 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 11:027 Aug 2026, 18:44
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 811–813 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 18:44812no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:02812first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 19 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

78 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2937.2%
🙏2025.6%
1519.2%
👍1012.8%
👏33.85%
😱11.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 19 January 2026 to 19 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 May 2026, 09:33 UTC166 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @KSVORFPhoto

🔥 Право знать: как сказать ребёнку, что папа ушёл на СВО 🫂 Когда отец уходит на СВО, один из самых сложных вопросов в семье — как объяснить это ребёнку. Говорить правду или попытаться защитить от неё? Об этом мы спросили Михаила Хасьминского — кризисного психолога, эксперта КСВО. Ребёнок — такой же член семьи, как и взрослые. И если он уже находится в возрасте, когда способен что-то понимать, он имеет право знать,

👍5

19 May 2026, 09:33 UTC147 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @child_of_balancePhoto

ИГРА В ВОЙНУ ✍️ Уже писала на эту тему в начале СВО, но не утихает дискуссия вокруг уместности военного «Лего» (как на фото, например) и вообще армейской тематики в детских играх. Интересен факт: уже в ходе Второй мировой войны выяснилось, что многие американские солдаты были неспособны выстрелить во врага, поскольку тренировались «на мишенях». Их на фронте уже не было, и остался психологический барьер. Тогда подпо

👍1😱1

26 Feb 2026, 05:43 UTC435 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @boriskorchevnikovPhoto

Почти 5 часов вчера шёл в Госдуме важный - на самом деле самый важный - разговор о том, как Указ Президента о защите наших традиционных ценностей превратить в Законы и как этот Указ реализуется в медиасреде. А медиасреда - это передовая и, как ни крути, главный сегодня способ внедредния любых ценностей. Инициатор круглого стола - Яна Лантратова и её коллеги - собрали очень широкий круг людей - министерства, контрол

🔥93🙏2👍1

6 Feb 2026, 19:14 UTC585 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ProjectsRFPhoto

🟣Старт заявочной кампании проекта «Академия КСВО.РФ» Открыт прием заявок на участие в проекте «Академии КСВО РФ — образовательном проекте для региональных команд НКО и волонтерских объединений, оказывающих поддержку участникам СВО и их семьям. Если у вас есть проектная идея, команда и желание развиваться — самое время подать заявку. 📎Регистрация доступна по ссылке: https://tavrida.art/pa3 Требования к регистрации

👍3🔥2

19 Jan 2026, 07:48 UTC795 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @KSVORFVideo

🔥 "Живём дальше, девочки..." ⚡️Специально для вас небольшая зарисовка. Хотим напомнить, как проходили курсы реабилитационной программы «Возрождение», разработанной Комитетом семей воинов Отечества. ✔️Что делали, как себя ощущали и воспринимали родные погибших защитников Отечества и близкие пропавших без вести бойцов? Каким был путь к себе? Ответы в представленном видеоролике. ✔️Здесь нет долгих интервью. Просто мы

🔥15🙏105

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @khasminski. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 662,598 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кризисный психолог Михаил Хасьминский” (@khasminski), 812 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khasminski.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.