Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Александр Петров | Профайлинг | 7 радикалов

Channel

Александр Петров | Профайлинг | 7 радикалов

@keytosense

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,848subscribers

-44 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001171158486
TypeChannel
Username@keytosense
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/keytosense

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (3 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@keytosense/1926 · this entry15 Jul 2026, 11:53 UTC@avernuslab/169215 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC1.00under a minute
@keytosense/1932 · this entry20 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC@avernuslab/169420 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC1.00under a minute
@keytosense/1937 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 07:28 UTC@avernuslab/169728 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@avernuslab15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (15–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @keytosense — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5,8485,8925,8706 August 2026 — 5,892 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,892 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,891 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,890 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,881 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,880 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,879 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,873 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,872 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,871 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,869 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,871 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,868 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,857 subscribers17 September 2026 — 5,855 subscribers26 September 2026 — 5,848 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
16 measurements spanning 51 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,841–5,899 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 05:015,848-7
17 Sept 2026, 18:555,855-2
13 Sept 2026, 13:175,857-11
9 Sept 2026, 20:005,868-3
4 Sept 2026, 21:395,871+2
1 Sept 2026, 11:535,869-2
29 Aug 2026, 07:035,871-1
26 Aug 2026, 01:135,872-1
22 Aug 2026, 20:065,873-6
19 Aug 2026, 08:555,879-1
16 Aug 2026, 07:375,880-1
12 Aug 2026, 12:465,881-9
9 Aug 2026, 19:215,890-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:205,891-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:465,892no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:385,892first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

170 reactions across 22 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5934.7%
❤5834.1%
🔥4425.9%
😁74.12%
👏21.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 170 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC112 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Почему во все времена люди стремились объединяться в сообщества? Если посмотреть на историю, видна одна устойчивая закономерность. Человеку недостаточно просто находиться в обществе. Ему важно находить своих людей, с которыми совпадают интересы, ценности или представление о будущем. В Англии XIX века существовали сотни джентльменских клубов. Причём рядом с политическими и научными клубами появлялись и весьма экстра…

👍6

10 Aug 2026, 04:43 UTC200 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⭐️Расписание основных встреч клубов Академии влияния на текущую неделю: 1. Сегодня, понедельник, 10 августа, 19:00 мск Практика по манипуляциям Клуб Тонкого Влияния ⭐️Внимание, новый клуб! 2. Сегодня, понедельник, 10 августа, 20:00 мск Психологический профиль маньяка Клуб «Анатомия зла» 3. Среда, 12 августа, 18:00 мск Говорим легко и ясно: избавляемся от речевого мусора Клуб «Архитектура речи» 4. Среда, 12 август…

👍2

4 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC345 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Иногда убеждения приходится менять не потому, что вы готовы, а потому, что прежняя картина мира больше не соответствует реальности. Семнадцатилетняя дочь сообщает о беременности. Сын отказывается продолжать семейную военную традицию и решает стать дизайнером. В обоих случаях родители сталкиваются не только с поступком ребёнка. Рушатся их планы и представления о том, какой должна быть правильная жизнь. Дальше есть …

👍6❤1

3 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC321 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⭐️Внимание. Курс "Коррекция убеждений" стартует завтра Напоминаю, что вас ждет 8 встреч на платформе Zoom продолжительностью 1,5 часа каждая. В процессе обучения Вы научитесь: - помогать людям разрушать ограничивающие и создавать поддерживающие убеждения (либо наоборот!); - менять свои собственные убеждения на более эффективные; - использовать фокусы языка для ответа на упреки, "наезды" и обвинения в ваш адрес; - …

🔥5

31 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC357 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Нам каждый день приходится в чем-то убеждать людей Супруги спорят, на что потратить новогоднюю премию – на шубу или отдых за границей. Бизнес-партнеры обсуждают, стоит ли вкладывать средства фирмы в рисковый проект. Вы пытаетесь донести до начальника, что любите свою работу, но отдавать ей семь дней в неделю физически не в состоянии. И таких примеров множество. Сама жизнь прямо намекает нам: «Хочешь побеждать? Учис…

❤3

29 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTC385 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сколько существует человечество, столько люди пытаются убедить друг друга в собственной правоте. И далеко не всегда мирными способами. Почему? Потому что нам трудно принять простую мысль: характер и мышление другого человека могут кардинально отличаться от наших собственных. Каждому кажется очевидной именно его картина мира. Она знакома ему столько, сколько он себя помнит. А находиться внутри привычных убеждений п…

❤6🔥4👍1😁1

29 Jul 2026, 13:53 UTC316 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

Участницы 19-го потока курса психотипов Юля и Альбина подготовили классную презентацию о том, как 7 радикалов проявляются в живописи. Рекомендую с ней ознакомиться. Она помогает увидеть знакомые психотипы с новой стороны и лучше понять, как характер художника проявляется в его работах.

🔥12❤2👍2

28 Jul 2026, 07:28 UTC377 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Что делать, если не получается найти выход из конфликта Приходилось ли вам сталкиваться с ситуациями, когда конфликт, на первый взгляд, неразрешим? Например, из-за партнера у вас произошел кассовый разрыв и это привело к крупным штрафам. Или молодожёны пытаются бескомпромиссно «делить» подаренные на свадьбу деньги, разумеется, лучше зная, куда их потратить. Если же приводить примеры неразрешимых конфликтов на рабоч…

🔥4❤2👍2

27 Jul 2026, 10:21 UTC388 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⭐️Расписание основных встреч клубов Академии влияния на текущую неделю: 1. Сегодня, понедельник, 27 июля, 19:00 мск Практика по манипуляциям Клуб Тонкого Влияния 2. Вторник, 28 июля, 19:00 мск Занятие по методике Внутренней Империи. Клуб «Внутренняя Империя» 4. Среда, 29 июля, 19:00 мск Как подготовиться к встрече за 90 минут Клуб «Бизнес-профайлинг» 5. Четверг, 30 июля, 19.00 мск Семинар №4. Отработка конфликтны…

👍5

25 Jul 2026, 15:23 UTC461 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Как перестать срываться на провокации Если на вас наезжают, то чаще всего первая реакция - это агрессия в ответ. Это дает манипулятору возможность обвинить вас в неадекватности. Он выставил вам претензию, например назвал вас эгоистом, вы на нее резко ответили. И он подводит итог: "-Ты не только эгоист, но еще и истеричка" Смотрите в чем секрет. Причина ваших эмоциональных реакций внутри вас. Вы же не будете реагиро…

👍9❤5🔥3

22 Jul 2026, 08:37 UTC486 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Почему на курсе «Коррекция убеждений» я использую фокусы языка Можно привести 10 аргументов, и не сдвинуть убеждения человека ни на миллиметр. Потому что убеждения редко держатся только на логике. За ними стоят привычные способы объяснять события. Например, человек говорит: «Если я ошибусь, окружающие перестанут меня уважать». Если начать доказывать, что это неправда, он еще активнее станет защищать свою позицию.…

❤4👏2

21 Jul 2026, 08:23 UTC457 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⭐️Расписание основных встреч клубов Академии влияния на текущую неделю: 1. Вторник, 21 июля, 19:00 мск Занятие по методике Внутренней Империи. Клуб «Внутренняя Империя» 2. Вторник, 21 июля, 20:00 мск Почему пациенты не выполняют назначения Клуб «Профайлинг на медицинском» 3. Среда, 22 июля, 16:00 мск Смысловые акценты и интонационная выразительность Клуб «Архитектура речи» 4. Пятница, 24 июля, 19:00 мск Практика …

❤3🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @keytosense. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Профайлинг, нейротехнологии и детекции лжи
@ProProfiIing · 23,133
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
Михаил Дементьев. Кинетический интеллект
@kintellect · 36,270
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Александр Петров | Профайлинг | 7 радикалов” (@keytosense), 5,848 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/keytosense.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.