Photo, posted without a caption
Signed قناة السلف الدعوية الرسمية

Channel
@kanat_el_salaf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
674subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001384046292 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kanat_el_salaf |
| Description | على منهج الكتاب والسنة بفهم سلف الأمة |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kanat_el_salaf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:39 | 674 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:29 | 674 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed قناة السلف الدعوية الرسمية
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed قناة السلف الدعوية الرسمية
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed قناة السلف الدعوية الرسمية
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed قناة السلف الدعوية الرسمية
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed قناة السلف الدعوية الرسمية
📌 من الشبهات التي رد عليها الشيخ #نور_الدين_يطو سلمه اللّه | مدينة عنابة • #سؤال : شيخنا بعض الإخوة يقولون إذا كانت أخطاؤهم قديمة، فلماذا تأخر الشيخ في بيان حالهم إلى عموم السلفيين ؟ • #الجواب: الشيخ حفظه الله يعرفهم منذ زمن، يعرفهم أيام كانوا طلبة عنده في الجامعة، ويعرفهما من بداية الدعوة حين بدؤوا يدعون إلى الله سبحانه وتعالى، وكان يلاحظ عليهم الشيخ أشياء، وينتقد عليهم أشياء، والشيخ كان ينصح، إما أن ينصحهم مباشرة ف…
Signed قناة السلف الدعوية الرسمية
الشيخ العلامة عبد المحسن العباد حفظه الله ، حفظت كرامته ولم يرمى بالسرورية كما رمي الشيخ العلامة محمد علي فركوس حفظه الله... بل اذا سألت القوم عن الكتابات والصوتيات الواضحة للشيخ العلامة العباد في مسألة الإنكار العلني بالضوابط الشرعية كما في هذه الصوتية 👆 لرأيتهم يثنون عليه ثناءا عطرا ويحفظون كرامته....
Signed قناة السلف الدعوية الرسمية
 جديد  من المشايخ الواضحين للذين يتربصون بالشيخ فركوس الدوائر رويدكم دونكم جبل أشم للشيخ الفاضل أبي حازم عبدالله كشاوي حفظه الله تعالى
Signed قناة السلف الدعوية الرسمية
هذه ستبقى في عاقبكم إلى أن تلقوا ربكم... وسيكون الشيخ العلامة محمد علي فركوس حفظه الله خصمكم يوم القيامة...
Signed قناة السلف الدعوية الرسمية
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed قناة السلف الدعوية الرسمية
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed قناة السلف الدعوية الرسمية
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed قناة السلف الدعوية الرسمية
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kanat_el_salaf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,457,242 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kanat_el_salaf named 17 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة السلف الدعوية” (@kanat_el_salaf), 674 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kanat_el_salaf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.