Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Блиндаж дяди Жоры

Channel

Блиндаж дяди Жоры

@dugout_uncle_zhora

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,025subscribers

-235 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001517918617
TypeChannel
Username@dugout_uncle_zhora
DescriptionПро любовь к Родине, малую саперную лопату, плоский автомат и подводный ножевой бой
Created28 April 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/dugout_uncle_zhora

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,02511,26211,143.56 August 2026 — 11,260 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,259 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,258 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,250 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,257 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,262 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,254 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,250 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,243 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,230 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,225 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,221 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,218 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,222 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,218 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,217 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,212 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,203 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,199 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,197 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,190 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,184 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,185 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,166 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,163 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,155 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,150 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,141 subscribers26 September 2026 — 11,128 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,117 subscribers9 October 2026 — 11,099 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,096 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,090 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,092 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,094 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,096 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,092 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,088 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,086 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,084 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,078 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,079 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,069 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,068 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,065 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,059 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,056 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,055 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,050 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,049 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,043 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,039 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,034 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,029 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,030 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,028 subscribers8 November 2026 — 11,025 subscribers6 August 20268 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 94 days, net -235. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,989–11,298 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 04:5211,025-3
6 Nov 2026, 21:4411,028-2
6 Nov 2026, 00:1711,030+1
4 Nov 2026, 21:4811,029-5
3 Nov 2026, 21:0611,034-5
2 Nov 2026, 23:5511,039-4
1 Nov 2026, 23:3511,043-6
1 Nov 2026, 02:5911,049-1
31 Oct 2026, 04:4111,050-5
30 Oct 2026, 05:4911,055-1
29 Oct 2026, 03:2011,056-3
27 Oct 2026, 23:2711,059-6
27 Oct 2026, 00:5711,065-3
26 Oct 2026, 01:1111,068-1
25 Oct 2026, 00:0711,069-10
24 Oct 2026, 02:4511,079+1
23 Oct 2026, 00:3511,078-6
21 Oct 2026, 23:0711,084-2
20 Oct 2026, 17:0611,086-2
19 Oct 2026, 16:4711,088first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.6%
avg views ÷ 11,025 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,940
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026
Posts held51 (23 July 2026 – 1 November 2026)
Views total11,750
Reactions total238
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 21:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
292
Videos
639
Links
131

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
42m 38s
Average length
1m 13s

Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,704 reactions across 51 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥45816.9%
👍40414.9%
🙏34012.6%
🫡2699.95%
😁2208.14%
❤2057.58%
👏1706.29%
🤣1545.70%
😡913.37%
💯782.88%
😢692.55%
🏆281.04%
😭270.999%
🤬270.999%
🎉220.814%
⚡200.74%
❤‍🔥180.666%
😎130.481%
🤔120.444%
🤮120.444%
24 further kinds672.48%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,704 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 51 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dugout_uncle_zhora. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 1 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

1 Nov 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,410 views32 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @risk_training

Я кстати знаю где взять и все слова подтвердить могу. Хочешь двигаться нужна Балалайка ➡️ @Balalaika_Kamerton_bot https://t.me/filatovcorr/7741

❤17🫡7❤‍🔥3👍3👌1🔥1

24 Oct 2026, 19:13 UTC≈2,600 views39 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @warwebmVideo

war webm в TG

🤣27🤯6😁4👏2

24 Oct 2026, 17:00 UTC≈2,450 views17 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @risk_trainingVideo

Подземная, она же трубопроводная война глазами оппонента на Харьковском направлении. Тренируйся! ♠️ Снаряжение Risk Training RT в TG ✊ | RT в МАХ 🇷🇺

😎10👍5🔥2

12 Oct 2026, 13:10 UTC≈5,290 views150 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Old School

🔥102🏆28👍10⚡6❤3😁1

1 Oct 2026, 11:30 UTC≈4,690 views24 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @warwebmVideo

🫀 war webm в MX | TG | VK

👍10❤7😁5💯1🔥1

22 Sept 2026, 12:57 UTC≈5,150 views65 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @kaskader3Photo

Последний день укутанный закатом. последний шелест горечи травы. последний дрон пархает рядом. последняя надежда и последние мечты.

🫡32🙏21❤9❤‍🔥2🔥1

20 Sept 2026, 04:00 UTC≈4,300 views49 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @kaskader3Video

Работа нашего оператора Ф. Сквозь множество криков корректировки, сохраняя хладнокровие и уверенность в каждом движении, поражает противника изо дня в день. Убийца с детским голосом и мозолями на пальцах (от круглосуточной работы) доказывает всем профессионалам то, что загонит противника в угол, лишь бы была команда: «Ф***, в небо с осколком». Ответ краток: «Принял, уже в небе». Работаем🦉

🔥38👍6❤5

19 Sept 2026, 04:53 UTC≈3,920 views59 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @risk_trainingVideo

Несколько боевых миссий Разведывательно-спасательного отряда глазами медика с позывным Доктор Уик. Спасение раненых, рекогносцировка и сопровождение групп на боевые маршруты, помощь в работе МОГу. Три минуты полного погружения в повседневные задачи отряда 🇷🇺 Тренируйся! ♠️ Снаряжение Risk Training RT в TG ✊ | RT в МАХ 🇷🇺

🙏34👍9🫡8🔥5❤1❤‍🔥1🤝1

16 Sept 2026, 14:12 UTC≈3,440 views91 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @risk_trainingVideo

Опыт ВОВ актуален и сегодня. Кенигсберг не даст соврать. Тренируйся! ♠️ Снаряжение Risk Training RT в TG ✊ | RT в МАХ 🇷🇺

🙏40🫡24🔥16👍4💯4💊2😁1

3 Sept 2026, 14:59 UTC≈4,480 views76 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @filatovcorrPhoto

Там где была война... Холмик в кадре - блиндаж, в котором жили годами... Поколение. 10 лет - это школу окончить. А сколько мужиков прожило в таких блиндажах?.. Народ, первым вышедший в космос, в 21 веке ))) Исторический процесс это не всегда про линейное движение вперед... будем надеяться и делать все, чтобы вернуться в ряды делателей прогресса, а не kpi по распродаже ресурсов))))

🫡39💯18😢9❤8🔥1🦄1

29 Aug 2026, 20:58 UTC≈4,920 views62 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @izdelie104Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁53👍3❤2👏2🥰2

29 Aug 2026, 06:37 UTC≈4,720 views64 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @kamerton_pressVideo

Мужики поздравляем вас! Главное живите! Ахмат-СИЛА! Россия-МОЩЬ! @kamerton_press 😀 Мы шли и будем идти вперед!

🙏39👍16🤮6❤1😁1🙊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @dugout_uncle_zhora. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Блиндаж дяди Жоры” (@dugout_uncle_zhora), 11,025 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dugout_uncle_zhora.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.