Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Alien外星人

@SteamVents

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,377subscribers

+38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001283168745
TypeChannel
Username@SteamVents
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SteamVents

Growth

2,3392,3772,3586 August 2026 — 2,339 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,359 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,377 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,333–2,383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 17:432,377+18
7 Aug 2026, 18:122,359+20
6 Aug 2026, 23:482,339first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 10 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.4%
avg views ÷ 2,377 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (10 March 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,037
Reactions total63
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

269 reactions across 17 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8330.9%
5319.7%
🥰238.55%
😁217.81%
💔165.95%
🙏165.95%
🔥124.46%
🤡124.46%
👎72.60%
😐51.86%
41.49%
🤬41.49%
😢31.12%
🥱31.12%
👏20.743%
🤨20.743%
🌚10.372%
🏆10.372%
😱10.372%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 269reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC625 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

亡母二十周年祭 今年三月,我带家人回国了两个月,先飞回天津,然后从北到南去了保定、大连、杭州、安吉、广州、深圳、珠海。在大连见了一个高中老友,老友和她母亲曾有很长一段时间居住在我母亲家中,她们非常亲近,在最后的两年中,老友和我母亲的相处时间甚至比我这个儿子都长得多。 饭桌上,偶尔谈起我母亲,老友也潸然泪下,还说了一些我并不知道的事情。例如我母亲买衣服经常是在一家店里一次性买很多等等。这些琐事我完全不知道,初听诧异,但是想了想,确实符合她的性格。 (这次回家后,我收拾了老照片,全部带回加拿大。图上的那只大狗,曾在我家住过三天,她的儿子——一只可爱的小黑狗——也在我家和我生活过一个月。) 高中毕业到现在20年来,我一直不太敢联系这个老朋友,就是因为只要想起她,我就想起母亲,就会让太多记忆碎片在心中激荡,像一股妖风卷起了玻璃碎片,像开车撞向一堵墙,像一个武林高手死于冒蓝火的加特林。在我的记忆和情感里,老友和我母亲几乎是不可分割

💔16🙏162🌚1🔥1😢1

27 Jul 2026, 16:33 UTC962 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

(图为温哥华本地的当前在线Meshtastic 节点,能看到最南的美国 Point Roberts 也有几个节点) 无线电技术是我极为喜爱的一个通讯技术分支,因为它有巨大的技术底座和广泛的应用,例如手机信号、电台广播、短波通联、蓝牙、LoRa和Meshtastic,天然分布式,有大量应用场景只受限于物理法则而非中央机房或法律法规。 我时不时玩的用SDR(软件定义无线电)收电波,把模拟信号数字化,看RDS的电台节目名一个字母一个字母的蹦出来,很有趣。 当年的课堂项目:一个基于汽车钥匙信号截取、重放的中继攻击,也是灵感来自SDR。可以实现对老型号汽车的无接触盗取。新一点的车辆会在信号中加入rolling code滚动码,类似于两步验证中authenticator提供的短时间有效的认证码,我的原始中继攻击就会因认证失效而失败。当然这也有办法处理,可以在车钥匙发送信号时在几十个毫秒内检测到信号并发出大量信号进行干扰(想起了刘慈欣的

44👍1😁1

24 Jul 2026, 22:00 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 7 August 2026

吴恩达也做了一个办公agent,OpenWorker,目前仅支持mac,windows版本后续会上。用啥也别用workbuddy了。 https://x.com/andrewyng/status/2080333504446108104?s=46

24 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC≈1,080 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

最近openai的受测模型由于要被测试,所以暂时取消了安全护栏,结果它在一个沙盒环境中越狱,为了寻找测试答案而对Huggingface发起了17000次攻击,并成功获取答案。 人类历史上第一场AI自主发动的网络攻击真的让人毛骨悚然: 受测模型的环境没有联网权限,只有一个代理服务可以下载各种依赖,然后模型找到了代理软件漏洞,给自己提权,越狱成功,随后找到一个有外网权限的机器,通过机器发动攻击。 通过这一套流程,我们可以做一些简单推论: 1. 任何软件都有漏洞。任何收容环境都有失败可能。 2. AI 的网络安全能力可以被认为无上限。 3. 由于1和2,可得出,任何环境都迟早被AI攻破。 4. 由于3,可以得出结论,位于后端(不是软件工程中的后端,是业务流的后端)的安全加固,意义有限。最重要的,是前端加固,也就是看起来最简单的安全护栏Guardrails。 换句话说,与其和AI玩攻防,不如用自然语言在业务前端就禁止AI

6👎5

19 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTC≈1,280 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

昨天做饭的时候,突然想起来,智取威虎山里杨子荣进了威虎山以后的切口: 西北玄天一朵云,乌鸦落进了凤凰群;满屋皆是英雄汉,谁是君来谁是臣? 读起来和喊麦一模一样,大家试试…… 社会边缘,帮派,喊麦……这不就是东北岸说唱么?

😁4🔥1

7 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC≈2,910 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

微信记录导出工具 WeFlow 遭 GitHub DMCA 下架通知 WeFlow 是一款本地微信聊天记录查看、分析与导出工具,支持生成年度报告、群聊画像、消息防撤回及 HTTP API 等功能。7 月 7 日,其 GitHub 仓库收到 DMCA 下架通知,GitHub 官方已向开发者发送了相关邮件。 原repo已经删光:https://github.com/hicccc77/WeFlow 但依然可以看forks:https://github.com/hicccc77/WeFlow/network/members 技术很复杂,我看不懂,大家来看看吧 腾讯这样把用户硬件上的用户数据当作自留地的做法,希望早日被罚成狗

7🤬3😐3🔥2😢2

2 Jul 2026, 01:21 UTC≈2,020 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Canada Day,一家人出去一天,下午小睡,娃又要去bike park玩遥控车、骑平衡车。孩子的精力怎么这么旺盛???

🥰61🏆1👍1🤨1😁1

27 Jun 2026, 07:50 UTC≈2,120 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

软件开发的模式,又变了。当然,我比较后知后觉。 最近几个月都没有正经vibe coding过,这两天刚好有个自己的需求,要在macbook上阅读一个chm文件,找不到合适的阅读器,要么有广告、要么付费,于是干脆拿Codex手搓一个。 首先,Terminal-Based Vibe Coding 浪潮已经结束。所有的coding agent 都有自己的桌面端,所有聚焦于代码阅读、修改、补全的IDE都事实上死亡了。Cursor把自己改成了对话式coding agent,倔强的JetBrain 几乎看不到任何维持原有庞大IDE业务的可能性。曾经,我喜欢用Cursor来Debug,依然浪漫的保留一点古法编程的仪式感,现在没有这个必要了。 其次,模型能力比我上一次大规模开发(大约大半年之前)增强了很多,主要是省心。我记得去年进行大规模开发自己的AI安全产品时,很重要的一个我的个人需求就是要让单元测试代码覆盖率到达60%以上,为此增加了

👍8🔥3🥰1

10 Jun 2026, 03:30 UTC≈1,770 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

几个月没来Downtown,突然来一下子,感觉像是出了个国

🔥3😐21

30 May 2026, 16:07 UTC≈2,360 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Deepseek 4 Flash + Pro 的价格真可以,让它帮我在本地跑了半个小时,扫描200个公司,花了3毛钱。虽然在深度推理、世界知识上和GPT和Claude上还有很大差距,但是干一些体力活肯定量大管饱。

😁62👏2

22 May 2026, 14:49 UTC≈2,610 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

我朋友/群友 胡贝侨 做了一个雅思/思培口语练习应用: JoeSpeaking.com 可以像真实考试一样与 AI 雅思考官实时自然对话,完成后获得即时反馈。 去年我们第一次在温哥华见面,他提到了这个产品方向,现在居然已经有付费用户了。 这次他给了 20 个 Credit,在设置输入 ALIEN200 即可领取,先到先得,有英语考试需求的朋友赶紧免费用起来。 === 如果有朋友需要对自己的 AI 产品进行推广,可以直接在群里发言,我会酌情在频道做免费推送。频道订阅者2000多人,希望大家都能互相提建议,互相产生共鸣,共同扶持走过冷启动和慢增长。

9👍2🤨1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @SteamVents. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 462,927 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alien外星人” (@SteamVents), 2,377 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SteamVents.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.