Channel
@lazznftreviews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002714781693 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lazznftreviews |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 7 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lazznftreviews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 1 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 2 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 2 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 7 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
🎁 16 факелов — БЕСПЛАТНО 🎁 Условия: Быть подписанным на: » @imperiyadurova » @souijagifts » @nftgiftTGnft » @lazznft Итоги сегодня в 19:00 ✔️ 🎉 UPD: Розыгрыш завершен! 🏆 Победители: 1. @Semochkapolozunchik 🔍 Проверить результаты Подарки были выданы победителем @lazznftreviews Вывод для тех кто не успел: выключайте уведомления😉
Photo, posted without a caption
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 5 победителей по 100 звезд Условия Быть подписанным на: 🔵@lazznft 🔵@massalnft 🔵@nftquenn 🔵@midstarshop 🔴Поставить реакцию на пост добавляет 5% к победе Итоги в 11:00 по киеву 🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. миатрис (@exploiw) 2. Небо ☁️ (@M571ON) 3. samurai (@xsamuraai) 4. hubayb (@ibnhubayb) 5. Никита (@Hekta52) ✔️Проверить результаты Подарки были выданы победителем @lazznftreviews Вывод д…
Photo, posted without a caption
🎁Розыгрыш на NFT JingleBells🎁 Условия Быть подписанным на: 🔵@lazznft 🔵@juici_nft 🔴Поставить реакцию на пост добавляет 5% к победе Итоги через 24 часа⏰ 🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победитель: 1. Максимка (@retrozawr) ✔️Проверить результаты Подарки были выданы победителем @lazznftreviews Вывод для тех кто не успел: выключайте уведомления 😉
Photo, posted without a caption
Быстрый розыгрыш на 3🧸 3 победителя каждому по 🧸 Условия: Подписаться на: 🔵@nftquenn Итоги на 70 участников 🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. ㅤ🥷🏼 (@Shama_550) 2. Жорик (@zhorikzhora) 3. ︎bilal ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎︎ (@watch009g) ✔️Проверить результаты Подарки были выданы победителем @lazznftreviews Вывод для тех кто не успел: выключайте уведомления 😉
Photo, posted without a caption
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 5 победителей по 1 🧸 Условия Быть подписанным на: 🔵@lazznft 🔵@nftpodarkiss 🔴Поставить реакцию на пост добавляет 5% к победе Итоги в 21:00 по киеву 🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. Ilya Sergeev (@Ilya_Sergeev8) 2. スバル92. (@lliilllqIi1) 3. spectr (@ashenspectre730) 4. Александра (@AlexaGris7) 5. Миша (@prodbyrtb) ✔️Проверить результаты Подарки были выданы победителем @lazznftreviews Вывод для …
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @lazznftreviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@lazznftreviews named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“lazznft | итоги розыгрышей” (@lazznftreviews), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lazznftreviews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.