Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for иришкина радость

Channel

иришкина радость

@irrrrrrrishkatyt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

23,934subscribers

+1,300 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001818848082
TypeChannel
Username@irrrrrrrishkatyt
Descriptionномер заявления 8369761505 по вопросам рекламы/сотрудничества @pr_irrrrrrrishkatyt
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/irrrrrrrishkatyt

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

22,63423,94723,290.523,9346 August 20267 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 93 days, net +1,300. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,437–24,144 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 17:5923,934-13
6 Nov 2026, 15:3923,947+6
5 Nov 2026, 13:0923,941+11
4 Nov 2026, 10:1623,930-5
3 Nov 2026, 11:2823,935+2
2 Nov 2026, 09:4123,933-12
1 Nov 2026, 06:5523,945+4
31 Oct 2026, 08:5823,941+21
30 Oct 2026, 07:3623,920-3
29 Oct 2026, 10:0923,923-16
28 Oct 2026, 06:2923,939+37
27 Oct 2026, 04:2723,902+208
26 Oct 2026, 05:1023,694+105
25 Oct 2026, 01:5723,589+25
24 Oct 2026, 00:5823,564+43
22 Oct 2026, 22:1023,521+51
21 Oct 2026, 18:0823,470+89
20 Oct 2026, 12:4623,381+23
19 Oct 2026, 16:0523,358+23
18 Oct 2026, 13:0923,335first reading

Engagement

116 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.6%
avg views ÷ 23,934 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,050
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 116 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held116 (31 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total281,710
Reactions total7,613
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 17:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,070
Videos
≈213
Links
≈304

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 14s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

26,692 reactions across 113 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤17,22064.5%
💘1,9457.29%
❤‍🔥1,3254.96%
🔥1,0333.87%
😍9893.71%
🍓8613.23%
🥰8533.20%
💋6302.36%
🤩4651.74%
👍3351.26%
💔3301.24%
🤣1560.584%
😭1150.431%
🎉980.367%
🤓620.232%
🌚470.176%
💯420.157%
⚡350.131%
😁260.097%
😢240.09%
22 further kinds1010.378%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 113 of the 116 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,692 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 113 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @irrrrrrrishkatyt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 116 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 36 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 09:47 UTC≈4,380 views161 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

что ни день, то новинка от sen sulu! тональный крем с ухаживающими компонентами в трех оттенках вот за что я люблю sen sulu, так это за то, что у них очень легкие в работе продукты тон прекрасно лег, легко растушевался кистью. я делала очень тонкое покрытие, но я думаю, что и наслоить его можно очень красиво выравнивает без лишнего сияния, хорошо перекрывает, не лежит маской и даже на мой жирной коже продержался …

❤123❤‍🔥20🥰11💋4💔1🔥1🤩1

7 Nov 2026, 05:11 UTC≈5,690 views236 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤146💋41🔥24🤩14👍5💔3💘3

7 Nov 2026, 05:11 UTC≈5,540 views269 reactionsread 8 November 2026

такая вот, ребята, сегодня магия утра натерпелись за последние недели и решили, что жить так дальше просто невозможно и сделали шумоизоляцию и пошел процесс! я еще решила, что хочу перекрасить стены, костя уже уехал за краской. думаю, за выходные все покрашу и в пн начну снимать на новом фоне🤞🏻 надеюсь, результат не разочарует

❤182💋40🔥26🤩8💘4🍓3❤‍🔥2👍2

6 Nov 2026, 12:59 UTC≈6,310 views263 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

буквально волею судьбы у меня появилась лимитированная палетка этого года от hourglass ☺️ love - эксклюзив для сефоры конечно, сама себе я бы не купила, потому что «лебедь» служит мне исправно практически год и еще столько же поди прослужит! с лебедем у них одинаковые оттенки бронзера и пудры, а вот румяна отличаются…на бумаге) на деле, как и всегда, оттенки при тушевке уходят в теплоту. я делала сравнение (уже в…

❤197💋38❤‍🔥20👍3🔥2💔1🤩1🥰1

6 Nov 2026, 10:32 UTC≈6,640 views456 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

«вот бы уже снежок пошееел..» сказала мне вчера подружка заказывали? получите, распишитесь чтоб вы понимали, вчера еще сухо было! я только первый день в осенних ботинках вчера вышла, а сегодня уже все, jingle bells полный 🤩 а я и не против! я уже и новый год хочу!!!!!!! как у вас с погодой?)

❤340💋61🍓46❤‍🔥2👍2🤩2💔1💘1

4 Nov 2026, 14:15 UTC≈7,450 views172 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

приготовьте пальчики и кошелечки, потому что через минуту на randewoo стартует черная пятница! я уже добавила в корзину продукты для волос и пару пробников парфюмов, на которые давно смотрела ☺️ на всякий случай вам напомню, что кроме парфюма там есть абсолютно все для волос от инструментов до люксового стайлинга, последние новинки уходовой и декоративной косметики и куча брендов самое время урвать что-то по хорош…

❤129🥰24🔥17💅2

4 Nov 2026, 12:51 UTC≈8,140 views330 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

у меня в последнее время часто стали спрашивать про соц сеть, которую я отрицала дольше всех… вообще, мой опыт блогерства там и начался. я вела сначала блог учителя для учеников, делала всякие курсы по английскому, какие-то полезные штучки выкладывала и все такое потом у меня начали спрашивать про консультации и я перестроилась с учителя для учеников на учителя для учителей. проводила сначала консультации, потом мас…

❤262💘40🔥24👍2🤩2

3 Nov 2026, 10:41 UTC≈7,600 views348 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤208🔥59💘44🤩20🍓10👍3❤‍🔥2💔2

3 Nov 2026, 10:41 UTC≈7,780 views217 reactionsread 8 November 2026

ну что, первая укладка после стрижки получилась успешно! слои более очерченные, все, как я и хотела! ☺️

🔥138❤47👍16🤩6🍓4💘3💔2🥰1

2 Nov 2026, 11:23 UTC≈8,680 views363 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

в этот раз решила добавить больше слоев, чтобы они не сливались в одно полотно при укладке, а смотрели в разные стороны, поэтому запрос на стрижку теперь такой: плотный срез+активные слои у лица+филировка по длине (так это назовем) хочу прийти к такой же длине, как на фото(это не я, это реф) и тогда я буду счастлива стриглась как обычно в greenlab пермь, берем на заметку!

❤287👍32💔24🤩7❤‍🔥3💘3🔥3😍3

2 Nov 2026, 07:06 UTC≈7,930 views160 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤106💘27🔥11🏆5👍4🤩3💋2💔1

2 Nov 2026, 07:06 UTC≈7,930 views252 reactionsread 8 November 2026

время пришло, еду на стрижку уже третий раз в этом году я всегда буду из тех, кто лучше отстрижет концы, чем ходить с сечкой…you know поэтому готовим ручку и бумажку, чтобы записать формулу вашего будущего рефа на стрижку

❤191💘30🔥22👏4🍓1👍1💔1🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 116 posts we hold for @irrrrrrrishkatyt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“иришкина радость” (@irrrrrrrishkatyt), 23,934 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irrrrrrrishkatyt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.