Самое опасное испытание — это не бедность. Самое опасное испытание — собственный успех. Общаясь с людьми самых разных профессий и уровней, я заметил одну закономерность. Аллах испытывает каждого по-разному. Одних — бедностью. Других — богатством. Третьих — семьей, здоровьем, властью или знаниями. Но есть еще одно очень тонкое испытание, которое многие даже не замечают. Это успех. В данном случае я говорю о со…

Channel
Исламский менеджмент ☪️
@islam_management
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
186subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001968997981 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @islam_management |
| Description | База управленческих знаний и материалы по смежной тематике, ориентированной на руководителей мусульманских общин, имамов и активистов |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/islam_management |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 186 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 186 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 12 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 24.7%
- avg views ÷ 186 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 46.0
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (12 January 2024 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 92 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 21
- Videos
- 5
- Links
- 25
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 30s
- Average length
- 1m 30s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
92 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 40 | 43.5% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 18.5% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 16.3% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 5.43% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 4.35% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 3.26% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 2.17% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.17% | |
| 🙉 | 2 | 2.17% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.09% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 1.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2024 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Микроменеджмент в мечети: почему хороший мусульманин не всегда хороший руководитель В мусульманских организациях — от благотворительных фондов до мечетей и исламских центров — нередко можно наблюдать одну и ту же картину. Её возглавляет человек искренний, набожный, знающий, но… до предела измотанный. Он проверяет каждый чек, сам отвечает на все звонки, лично утверждает цвет скатерти на ифтар и тему детского урока. В…
🔥4
https://tbank.ru/baf/6Fu8uMyck3o
👍1
https://islamnews.ru/2026/3/27/ot-krasivykh-nachal-k-ustoychivym-delam-na-chem-spotykayutsya-musulmanskie-proekty
👍6
Photo, posted without a caption
👍5❤1👏1
Четыре качества лидера, которые Аллах упомянул в одном аяте Аллах перечислил качества истинного руководителя: 1. Мягкость – быть мягким по отношению к своим подчиненным. 2. Прощение – просить у Аллаха прощения за ошибки подчиненных. 3. Совет – обсуждать важные решения с подчиненными. 4. Твердость – после принятия решения полагаться на Аллаха и не обращать внимания на пораженцев. "По милости Аллаха ты был мягок …
👍5🎉2💯2❤1
Служба безОПАСНОСТИ: какие риски могут повлечь ошибки в работе службы безопасности и как их можно избежать Прямой эфир в четверг 9:00 мск Давно мы планировали эфир на эту тему, есть что обсудить, накопилось много кейсов Содержание эфира: ❓Такие ли безопасники, какими выдают себя? ❓Кто и как должен проверять работу безопасника? ❓Реальные кейсы работы безопасников, от которых «волосы дыбом» - как такое может быть…
🔥3❤1🫡1
Немного об очевидном в неочевидном при найме и управлении персоналом Всегда поражался таланту Аркадия Райкина. Уж насколько гениальный артист, что познакомившись с его творчеством уже после смерти юмориста, не перестаю черпать идеи и инсайты из его выступлений. И вот миниатюра о медведе, который работал на ставке зайца 🐻🐰 Ну, прям наша история! Прошу посмотреть и подумать, а заодно ответить, нет ли в вашей команде…
👍8🤝3🙉2
Почему инструменты управления могут не работать? 🤔 Теория менеджмента в экспертной среде воспринимается в основе неоднозначно 🤷♂️ Казалось бы, управленческая наука призвана решать боли как систем, так и работников. Однако, можно совершенно точно сказать, что на практике многие концепции не только не снимают боли, а даже в некотором смысле усиливают их. Старый добрый пример, когда руководитель прошел в уикенд как…
👍7💯2🔥2
Малик ибн Наби в своей книге «Мусульманин в Мире Экономики» говорит, рассуждая о проблемах, связанных с современными экономическими школами: Наша молодежь, которая озабочена вопросами экономики, должна прежде всего освободить свой разум от тех установок, на которых она выросла ( имеет в виду две основные экономические школы: либеральную и марксистскую), а затем уже строить что-то новое и лучшее. Добавлю от себя: …
❤8🔥3👎1🤝1
https://youtu.be/ezSEeZr7qGI?si=-qCtwpJ1T8kHieWg
❤3👍3🔥3💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @islam_management. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Исламский менеджмент ☪️” (@islam_management), 186 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/islam_management.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.