Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Золотой Сундук

Channel

Золотой Сундук

@zolotoisunduk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,026subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001744852270
TypeChannel
Username@zolotoisunduk
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 20 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zolotoisunduk

Growth

1,0261,0311,028.57 August 2026 — 1,029 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,029 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,031 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,029 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,026 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,025–1,032 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 19:381,026-3
13 Aug 2026, 09:031,029-2
10 Aug 2026, 07:121,031+2
7 Aug 2026, 05:531,029no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:311,029first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

146 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5437.0%
2617.8%
🔥2215.1%
custom 52356036811555143332114.4%
custom 523322355201398915396.16%
👏74.79%
👌21.37%
🤝21.37%
🥰21.37%
🤩10.685%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
595
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
727
over 18 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjcvxaad131 March 202631 March 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 8 June 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

8 Jun 2026, 15:07 UTC388 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍4custom 52356036811555143334👌2

27 May 2026, 12:59 UTC613 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52356036811555143334👍3

6 May 2026, 14:27 UTC845 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Выбираем тему инвестиционного форума в Казани

  1. Партнерские финансы в России: практика, риски и точка роста34%
  2. Партнерские финансы без иллюзий: кейсы, ошибки и реальные деньги48%
  3. Развитие партнерских финанмов в России: практика и институциональные решения14%
  4. Где деньги в партнерских финансах: инструменты, риски и возможности45%

The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍2custom 52332235520139891531

4 May 2026, 15:25 UTC639 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ассаламу алейкум. Хвала Всевышнему, в нашей каллобарации «Золотого сундука» и « UmmaLand” вышел очередной финкомикс. Уже 8й по счёту! ☺️

👍73

4 May 2026, 15:22 UTC594 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ummalandVideo

🆕🆕🆕🆕8 выпуск финансового комикса про исламские финансы 📖«БЛАГО ЗА БЛАГО» Бабушка попросила маленького Алима отнести пожертвование в мечеть, но подростки во дворе отобрали у него шкатулку с деньгами. На помощь расстровнному Алиму вовремя подоспели Тимур и Умар. Смогут ли они объяснить мальчику, что щедрость не всегда связана с богатством? 👉В этом номере «ФинКомикса» вы узнаете: 💙Что такое садака и какой она бывает?

22 Apr 2026, 10:24 UTC609 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍4🔥3🥰2

22 Apr 2026, 10:21 UTC567 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Директор компании «Золотой сундук» Юсупов Марат Венерович в КФУ провёл лекцию у магистрантов по исламским финансам.

🔥11

9 Apr 2026, 09:09 UTCviews —

Золотой Сундук pinned «📢 ОТКРЫТ НАБОР НА КУРС ПО ИСЛАМСКИМ ФИНАНСАМ Хотите глубже разобраться в исламских финансах, понять ключевые инструменты и получить системные знания по нормам ислама? Консалтинговая компания «Золотой Сундук» приглашает на авторский курс — 5 дней полного…»

7 Apr 2026, 14:48 UTC739 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Чтобы сделать курс более удобным и полезным для вас, уточним еще один момент: Кто вы?

  1. Брат69%
  2. Сестра31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Apr 2026, 08:25 UTC727 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Нам важно не просто провести курс, а сделать его доступным и полезным для вас. В каком формате вам было бы удобнее учиться?

  1. Оффлайн24%
  2. Онлайн57%
  3. Подойдет любой формат19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Apr 2026, 12:31 UTC608 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ас-Саляму алейкум уа рахматуЛлаhи уа баракатух Мы начали адаптировать наши материалы для международной аудитории. Это шаг к тому, чтобы знания об исламских финансах из России были доступны шире Просим вас поддержать наш новый YouTube-канал на английском языке. Очень важно не просто перейти по ссылке, а досмотреть оба ролика до конца и поставить лайк. Подпишитесь пожалуйста, если хотите поддержать распространение зн

3👍2🔥2custom 52356036811555143332

1 Apr 2026, 13:03 UTC826 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📢 ОТКРЫТ НАБОР НА КУРС ПО ИСЛАМСКИМ ФИНАНСАМ Хотите глубже разобраться в исламских финансах, понять ключевые инструменты и получить системные знания по нормам ислама? Консалтинговая компания «Золотой Сундук» приглашает на авторский курс — 5 дней полного погружения в тему. ✨ Что вас ждёт: — 12 лекций от экспертов-практиков — разбор финансовых вопросов по нормам ислама — нетворкинг и общение с единомышленниками — де

👍7custom 52356036811555143334🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zolotoisunduk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 May 2026, 14:27 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

Выбираем тему инвестиционного форума в Казани

  1. Партнерские финансы в России: практика, риски и точка роста34%
  2. Партнерские финансы без иллюзий: кейсы, ошибки и реальные деньги48%
  3. Развитие партнерских финанмов в России: практика и институциональные решения14%
  4. Где деньги в партнерских финансах: инструменты, риски и возможности45%

The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Apr 2026, 14:48 UTCAnonymous Poll91 voters

Чтобы сделать курс более удобным и полезным для вас, уточним еще один момент: Кто вы?

  1. Брат69%
  2. Сестра31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Apr 2026, 08:25 UTCAnonymous Poll75 voters

Нам важно не просто провести курс, а сделать его доступным и полезным для вас. В каком формате вам было бы удобнее учиться?

  1. Оффлайн24%
  2. Онлайн57%
  3. Подойдет любой формат19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 8 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 912,106 of 1,570,450entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Золотой Сундук” (@zolotoisunduk), 1,026 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zolotoisunduk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.