Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ирина Зайцева | лидерство и влияние ✨

Channel

Ирина Зайцева | лидерство и влияние ✨

@is_zaitseva

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,371subscribers

-160 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002289567402
TypeChannel
Username@is_zaitseva
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/is_zaitseva

Growth

6,3716,5316,4517 August 2026 — 6,531 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,531 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,512 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,465 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,426 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,371 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -160. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,347–6,555 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 16:166,371-55
14 Aug 2026, 07:486,426-39
11 Aug 2026, 07:216,465-47
8 Aug 2026, 14:516,512-19
7 Aug 2026, 16:016,531no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:516,531first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.84%
avg views ÷ 6,371 subscribers
Avg views / post
117
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
46.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (25 May 20263 August 2026)
Views total704
Reactions total326
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,189 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
26522.3%
🎉24520.6%
🔥23319.6%
👍22919.3%
😁21017.7%
👻30.252%
💯30.252%
🤗10.084%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,189reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @is_zaitseva. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 May 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC114 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Voytenko_coach

Друзья, ищу добровольцев! Я сейчас отрабатываю новую технику в психоаналитическом коучинге. Чтобы набить руку и докрутить метод, мне нужны реальные клиенты с живыми запросами. Поэтому я приглашаю вас и ваших знакомых, коллег или друзей - всех, кому это может быть полезно. Я предлагаю: 🔹 5 онлайн-сессий по 50 минут (раз в неделю), 🔹 Проработка личного запроса, 🔹 Стоимость всего пакета -1000 руб. (символическая плата

😁14👍13🎉12🔥1210

3 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC50 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ya_derzkiiVideo

Миф: если человек обиделся, значит, вы сделали что-то не так.😒 Нет. Чужая обида не является официальным заключением комиссии по вашей виновности. 📋 Иногда вы действительно были неправы. А иногда вы просто: 🚫 отказали; 🗣️ не согласились; 🚪 не пустили туда, куда раньше пускали; 🤷 не сделали то, чего от вас молча ожидали. И человек обиделся. Потому что обида бывает не только реакцией на причинённый вред. Иногда

4

3 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC108 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍1712🎉11🔥10😁10

24 Jul 2026, 06:37 UTC146 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

«Мне не настолько плохо, чтобы что-то менять». Я вдруг подумала, какая это удобная ловушка. Не настолько устала, чтобы остановиться. Не настолько раздражена, чтобы отказаться. Не настолько несчастна, чтобы уйти. Не настолько плохо, чтобы признать: мне уже давно не хорошо. 🫠 Мы почему-то ждём критической точки. Будто менять что-то можно только тогда, когда уже невозможно терпеть, спать, работать и делать вид, что в

16🎉16🔥13😁10👍9🤗1

22 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC138 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @cat_sun_marsPhoto

Сегодня робот-пылесос вышел на работу. 🤖 Через тридцать секунд Дизель уже бежал рядом и предлагал дружить. Марсик сопровождал объект на безопасном расстоянии. По его мнению, техника, которая сама ездит по квартире, явно что-то скрывает. Солнце лежала посреди комнаты. Пылесос подъехал. Остановился. Подумал. Развернулся. Дизель решил, что игра началась. Марсик потребовал проверить документы. Солнце даже не открыла в

👍18😁16🔥13🎉124👻1

19 Jul 2026, 06:09 UTC148 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Моё сердце теперь ходит за мной на четырёх лапах❤️

22🔥15😁13🎉11👍11

14 Jul 2026, 06:51 UTC215 views98 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Есть люди, которые разрешают себе расслабиться только после того, как убедятся, что всё точно хорошо. То есть никогда. 🫠 Тревога вообще не очень доверяет спокойствию. Если вокруг тихо, она начинает подозревать, что мы что-то пропустили. Если день складывается хорошо, значит, вероятно, неприятности просто задерживаются. Если ничего не болит, не рушится и не требует срочного спасения, мозг открывает внутренний отде

23🔥23👍19😁18🎉15

14 Jul 2026, 06:26 UTC78 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @cat_sun_marsPhoto

Ночью Дизель спал под открытым окном. 🪟🌙 Животом вверх. Лапами в разные стороны. 🐾 С выражением человека, который оплатил номер с кондиционером и не желает слышать претензии администрации. 😌 Я ходила вокруг и думала: Ему хорошо или его продует? 🤔 Ему не жарко или уже холодно? Нужно закрыть окно или не мешать существу, которое явно достигло внутренней гармонии раньше всей семьи? 🧘‍♂️🐶 Марсик смотрел на Дизеля с тр

6👻1

10 Jul 2026, 03:05 UTC146 views69 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня в 5:52. Прекрасное утро в городе белых ночей. 🌅✨ Спать невозможно, потому что природа не спит вместе с тобой уже как минимум три часа. 🌿 Птицы включили утренний пленум. 🐦 Небо делает вид, что ночь была техническим перерывом. Организм такой: «Вставай. Жизнь зовёт. Мы сейчас всё решим». ⚡️ И в этот момент правда кажется, что ты удивительно продуктивный человек. 🧠☕️ Можно написать план. Придумать проект. Раз

🔥22🎉15😁1210👍10

9 Jul 2026, 10:04 UTC132 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ири сегодня поняла страшное: иногда «я просто всё контролирую» означает «я уже мысленно уволила Бога и сама вышла на его смену». 🫠⚡️ Мы часто называем ответственностью то, что на самом деле является тревогой в деловом костюме. 👔😵‍💫 Проверить всех. Предугадать всё. Держать лицо. Держать план. Держать мир, пока он, неблагодарный, снова делает что-то своё. 🌍🙄 Но чем сильнее мы пытаемся всё удержать, тем больше жизнь

👍1613🔥12😁12🎉9

9 Jul 2026, 10:02 UTC127 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мастермайнд на 5 недель — не для «желающих», а для тех, кто устал быть одна в своём хаосе. Маленькая проверка. Прямо сейчас, пока ты читаешь этот текст: - У тебя есть запрос, который ты давно откладываешь, потому что «надо подумать»? - Ты знаешь, КАК делать свою работу, но каждый месяц теряешь клиентов, потому что не понимаешь, кому именно это продавать? - Ты смотришь на чужие запуски и чувствуешь, что могла бы б

🎉19👍14😁98🔥8

9 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC133 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Есть состояние, когда ты вроде всё понимаешь. Экспертность есть. Идеи есть. Опыт есть. Даже внутренний голос иногда говорит: «Ну вообще-то ты можешь больше». А потом включается другой голос: «надо подумать», «пока не время», «сначала разберусь», «вот ещё чуть-чуть подготовлюсь». И всё. Человек снова остаётся один на один со своим хаосом. Очень удобно, кстати. Хаос не спорит. Он просто съедает время. Оляьга запуск

15😁14👍11🎉8🔥8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @is_zaitseva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 169,814 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ирина Зайцева | лидерство и влияние ✨” (@is_zaitseva), 6,371 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/is_zaitseva.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.