Президент США: "Теперь, когда мы взяли это под контроль США, стоит ли изменить название Ормузского пролива на "Пролив Трампа"? Как и сама Америка, этот пролив станет "горячее", чем когда-либо. Благодарю вас за внимание к этому вопросу. Президент Дональд Дж. Трамп."

Channel
Новости Ирана
@iran_news_ru
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,541subscribers
-298 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001553359369 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iran_news_ru |
| Created | 6 November 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iran_news_ru |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 11,541 | -15 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:59 | 11,556 | -27 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 11,583 | -9 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 11,592 | -15 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 11,607 | -18 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:42 | 11,625 | +2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 11,623 | -9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 11,632 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 11,643 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 11,652 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 11,657 | -14 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 11,671 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 11,676 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 11,685 | -14 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 11,699 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 11,706 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 11,710 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 11,719 | -15 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 11,734 | -13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 11,747 | first reading |
Engagement
142 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.0%
- avg views ÷ 11,541 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,310
- 60 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 60
- of 142 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 142 (29 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 138,535 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 00:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 24m 59s
- Average length
- 1m 23s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
⚡️ Потоки нефти через Ормузский пролив резко восстановились. Министр энергетики США Крис Райт заявил, что в понедельник, 31 августа, через Ормузский пролив прошло более 17 млн баррелей нефти — это максимальный показатель с начала конфликта. По словам Райта, если добавить экспорт по трубопроводам Саудовской Аравии и ОАЭ, обходящим Ормуз, то общий объём поставок нефти из региона уже превысил довоенный уровень. До нача…
Согласно заявлениям представителей Исламской республики Иран, в результате американских ударов по Ирану прошлой ночью были уничтожены 14 военнослужащих правительственных сил: 7 в провинции Хузестан (боевики «Басидж») 4 в провинции Керманшах (боевики КСИР) 3 в провинции Хормозган (боевики «Басидж»)
Центральное командование США опровергло информацию о нанесении ударов по гражданскому населению после того, как иранские СМИ сообщили о гибели по меньшей мере четырех человек в результате американского удара по свадебной процессии в Сирике на юге Ирана. «В отличие от Корпуса стражей исламской революции, американские военные никогда не наносят ударов по гражданскому населению», — заявило Центральное командование аген…
Прошлой ночью в результате ударов США в городе Керманшах были убиты четыре офицера аэрокосмических сил КСИР.
Фото поврежденной радиовышки в Кохестке, которая находилась в жилом районе.
وضعیت دکل مخابراتی کوهستک که در منطقه مسکونی واقع شده بود. @iliaen
Zaryon OSINT @zarGEOINT 🇮🇷🇺🇸🔴 New photos and videos confirm that a residential area was hit by a suspected US strike last night in Kuhestak, Iran. Damaged buildings are next to a communications tower destroyed last night. 📍 26.80283, 57.02493 @GeoConfirmed @FaytuksNetwork @hey_itsmyturn ترجمه خودکار فارسی 🇮🇷🇺🇸🔴 تصاویر و ویدئوهای جدید تأیید میکنند که شب گذشته، یک منطقه مسکونی در کوهستک ایران هدف حمله احتمالی آ…
В среду утром: обстановка в нескольких жилых домах в районе Кохестак (провинция Хормоган). @iliaen
Неужели это сигнал к началу протестов.
Центральное командование США заявило, что ему известно о сообщениях иранских государственных СМИ о том, что США нанесли удар по свадебной церемонии в Кухестаке недалеко от Сирика на юге Ирана, сообщает Axios. «Нам известно об этих сообщениях, которые исходят от иранских государственных СМИ», — заявил Axios представитель Центрального командования капитан Тим Хокинс. «Американские военные никогда не наносят удары по г…
Пост Трампа, машинный перевод: Я не собираюсь заставлять Иран сесть за стол переговоров, как об этом сообщает ABC Fake News. Мне совершенно неважно, подпишут ли они какое-либо соглашение, которое и для них самих не имеет никакой ценности. Я гораздо больше предпочитаю текущую ситуацию: мы имеем практически полный контроль над Ормузским проливом, а экономика Ирана находится в состоянии полного краха. Они просто идут п…
Showing the 12 most recent of 142 posts we hold for @iran_news_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@TherealIram · 3,7166 postsІстребін.UA
@istrebin · 20,9515 postsEzra Mor Youtube Show
@EzraMorYoutubeShow · 29,2921 postАлексей Железнов: ЦАХАЛ/Израиль/Ближний Восток⚔️
@alexavni · 81,4281 postОранжевый верблюд
@orangecamelil · 4971 postВосточный Синдром
@vostochnysyndrome · 83,6351 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@vahidonline · 1,402,04721 postsILIA HASHEMI
@iliaen · 249,44512 posts:)
@hey_itsmyturn · 104 postsShin | شین
@shin_persian · 17,8924 postsРеволюция в Иране
@Iran_Revolutionn · 14,9292 postsIran International ایران اینترنشنال
@iranintltv · 1,363,0391 postOSINTtechnical
@osinttechnical · 9521 postPLUSHEV/ПЛЮЩЕВ
@PlushevChannel · 98,2641 postRusNews ⭕️
@rusnews · 23,0881 postکانال اخبار سپاه پاسداران 🏴
@sepah_pasdaran · 725,4091 postSOTAvision
@sotavisionmedia · 42,1821 postЭто Гонч✌️ров
@this_is_goncharov · 4,8651 postVahid Headline وحید هدلاین
@VahidHeadline · 51,6051 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@iran_news_ru named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 3 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
named in 1 post, 3 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@irandezhurniy · 21,860
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 September 2026
@vostochnysyndrome · 83,635
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
@migdalsergei · 26,081
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
@gurevichonline · 42,037
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Новости Ирана” (@iran_news_ru), 11,541 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iran_news_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.