9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,852–28,886 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 18:24
28,856
-10
11 Aug 2026, 20:31
28,866
-6
10 Aug 2026, 22:51
28,872
-1
9 Aug 2026, 20:31
28,873
-4
8 Aug 2026, 20:38
28,877
-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:45
28,878
+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:20
28,877
-5
6 Aug 2026, 13:15
28,882
no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:09
28,882
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
72.7%
avg views ÷ 28,856 subscribers
Avg views / post
21,000
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
21 (18 May 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
125,830
Reactions total
5,913
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
195
Videos
14
Links
269
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
24,980 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
15,515
62.1%
❤
4,511
18.1%
🤔
2,274
9.10%
🙏
1,670
6.69%
🔥
447
1.79%
👏
254
1.02%
😁
140
0.56%
👎
124
0.496%
🤬
45
0.18%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,980reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,888
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 20 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
557
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @western_wall. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 May 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Насчет новости о желании некоего арабского государства заключить соглашение с Израилем, чтобы потом его нарушить. Текст на канале Стена плача, который вышел через 2 недели после прихода аль-Джулани к власти (20.12.24):
Нужна ли Израилю нормализация отношений с Сирией?
Несколько дней назад лидер сирийских повстанцев аль-Джулани заявил о том, что в Сирии больше не будут базироваться силы, представляющие угрозу для бе…
Если вы вдруг пропустили, мы перешли на новый формат и теперь выходят несколько выпусков в неделю.
Например, сегодня подробно говорим о том, почему современная Сирия всем так нужна.
А неделю назад обсуждали, что происходит с иранским влиянием в регионе.
Настоящая причина кризиса в Испании.
Вы же не думали, что одновременное вторжение десятков тысяч мигрантов на территорию Испании не имеет под собой геополитического контекста? Произошедшие в последние дни события похожи на скоординированную операцию, в которой замешаны сразу несколько стран, но какие именно? Сегодня разбираемся в том, почему на самом деле марокканские мигранты прорвали испанскую границу и какие у эт…
Мнения в Иране.
Вчера вышел очередной опрос независимой группы исследователей GAMAAN относительно общественного мнения в Иране. Из всех подобных исследований, которые публикуются об этой стране, данный считается наиболее близким к реальности, хотя и ему нельзя верить на 100%, ибо все респонденты отвечают на вопросы через интернет, что создаёт заведомый перекос в сторону противников иранского режима. Тем не менее он …
Друзья, мы с Борисом Миркиным сейчас готовим несколько совместных проектов. Скоро обязательно расскажем о них подробнее.
А пока хочу порекомендовать его Telegram-канал тем, кто еще не знаком с его работой.
«Радио Хамсин» (@RadioHamsin) - это качественная аналитика об Израиле, Ближнем Востоке, еврейской истории и мировой политике. Борис умеет объяснять сложные процессы простым языком и показывать исторический контек…
В начале недели мы начали готовить темы для видео на канале. Я уже долго подозревал, что происходит нечто странное в отношении Саудовской Аравии к Израилю — как будто кронпринц снова пересмотрел свои позиции и осознал, что ему необходим мир с еврейским государством.
Написал сценарий, и вдруг пришла новость о заключении ядерной сделки между США и саудитами, которая, видимо, стала ещё одним важным шагом в достижении н…
Про С-400 и Эмираты.
В прошедшую пятницу вышла новость о том, что Турция отдаст ОАЭ свои батареи С‑400, чтобы расчистить себе путь к закупке самолётов F‑35 у США - американцы сделали передачу российской техники в третьи страны обязательным условием для продажи туркам самолётов пятого поколения. И пока что это выглядит как абсолютно неправдоподобный вброс, не имеющий ни одного серьёзного доказательства своей логичнос…
На что стоит смотреть?
Имеет ли какой-то смысл обсуждать американские и иранские удары вчера ночью? Если и есть, то я его не вижу. Мы видим продолжение всё той же истории, что и месяц назад, только в немного другой констелляции. Вместо этого я предлагаю вам обратить внимание на детали этой истории, которые значительно важнее любых перечислений иранских городов, по которым были нанесены удары, или подсчёта количества…
Помните заголовки двухнедельной давности о капитуляции США перед Ираном?
«Американцы подарили Ливан Ирану». «Американцы отдали иранцам все их замороженные активы». «США предали Израиль» и так далее.
В ряде случаев это обсуждалось как данность. Иногда придумывались странные (а порой и нелепые) теории объяснения поведения американской администрации. Но большинство сходилось в одном — США сдались иранцам и оставили Из…
Мы поговорим про всё, что связано со сделкой, в грядущих итогах недели.
А пока я задам один простой вопрос людям, которые сеют не просто пессимизм, а настоящую панику и истерику, крича о том, что нас все бросили, всё пропало и так далее…
Вы действительно готовы поверить в то, что человек, который вернул в Израиль заложников в рамках сделки, которую все считали невозможной, который за несколько часов завладел самыми…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @western_wall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 409,301 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Стена плача” (@western_wall), 28,856 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/western_wall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
