National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @incident33 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
36 measurements spanning 50 days, net -856. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,942–50,054 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 23:41
49,070
-146
19 Sept 2026, 03:41
49,216
-33
16 Sept 2026, 20:20
49,249
-26
15 Sept 2026, 01:02
49,275
-37
13 Sept 2026, 11:18
49,312
-43
11 Sept 2026, 18:21
49,355
-46
9 Sept 2026, 06:00
49,401
-78
5 Sept 2026, 21:02
49,479
-34
3 Sept 2026, 22:21
49,513
-19
2 Sept 2026, 16:16
49,532
-18
1 Sept 2026, 17:53
49,550
-29
31 Aug 2026, 20:25
49,579
-23
30 Aug 2026, 17:23
49,602
-11
29 Aug 2026, 19:28
49,613
-26
28 Aug 2026, 18:25
49,639
-28
27 Aug 2026, 16:28
49,667
-12
26 Aug 2026, 16:03
49,679
-18
25 Aug 2026, 18:45
49,697
-10
24 Aug 2026, 16:58
49,707
-31
23 Aug 2026, 00:16
49,738
first reading
Engagement
188 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.44%
avg views ÷ 49,070 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,670
108 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.734%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
108
of 188 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
188 (31 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
288,486
Reactions total
2,117
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 09:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
13
Links
2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
8m 25s
Average length
34s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,796 reactions across 188 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
782
20.6%
🤡
443
11.7%
🤣
318
8.38%
😢
284
7.48%
👎
269
7.09%
🤬
205
5.40%
👍
204
5.37%
🔥
123
3.24%
😱
122
3.21%
🖕
112
2.95%
👏
86
2.27%
💩
74
1.95%
😡
72
1.90%
❤🔥
63
1.66%
💔
54
1.42%
🥴
54
1.42%
🤨
48
1.26%
😐
45
1.19%
🥰
42
1.11%
🙏
41
1.08%
31 further kinds
355
9.35%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 188 of the 188 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,796 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 188 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
1.60%
3 of 188 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,130
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,010
over 185 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFFwTKwF
1
14 September 2026
14 September 2026
2W5zFGgaNPT
1
26 September 2026
26 September 2026
2W5zFHR9VL5
1
24 September 2026
24 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 188 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🍷Пиво и вино в России резко подорожают с нового года.
Ставки планируют увеличить примерно на 6% для пива и на 6,8% для вина. Акциз на крепкое пиво может вырасти с 33 до 35 рублей за литр, на обычное вино — со 148 до 158 рублей, а на игристое — до 170 рублей.
В 2028–2029 годах ставки продолжат повышать.
Теперь официально: с 1 октября условия семейной ипотеки изменятся
• Ставка и лимиты будут зависеть от количества детей в семье,
• Срок действия льготного кредита ограничат 15 годами.
Все новые ставки и суммы лимитов собрали в карточке.
Но главное — еще можно успеть воспользоваться программой на прежних условиях.
Базовая ставка по семейной ипотеке сейчас составляет (ПСК - 17,571-17,847%) 6%, а в «УНО» действует су…
В России зафиксирован резкий скачок заболеваемости COVID-19, ОРВИ и гриппом — Роспотребнадзор.
На прошлой неделе зафиксировали 734,000 случаев заболеваний — это на 33,8% больше, чем неделей ранее.
Интенсивность распространения инфекций продолжает увеличиваться.
Я работаю парикмахером, мне нужно было отработать прическу клиента перед тем как плести на самом клиенте. Я взяла тренировочную голову домой, несла ее в пакете, потому что в сумку не уместилась. Стою на остановке, со мной рядом дед. Видит голову в пакете и сообщает мне, что звонит в полицию. Вы не представляете каких усилий мне и другим людям на остановке стоило успокоить его и уговаривать никуда не звонить! 😰
✈️ Российские авиакомпании начнут включать в стоимость билетов сбор на поддержку новейших самолетов SJ-100 и МС-21
Размер сбора пока не утвержден: обсуждается около 700 ₽ для внутренних и 1 800₽ для международных рейсов.
Станьте частью команды «УНО»
Мы растем и ищем того, кто видит уникальность нашего квартала и готов показать ее другим; того, кто своим обаянием и энергией вдохновляет на принятие больших решений; того, кто умеет прислушиваться к чужим потребностям и верит в пользу своего дела всей душой.
Да, все это о менеджере по продажам.
«УНО» в поиске талантливого сотрудника, который станет частью большой динамично развивающей…
🤑 Плата за ЖКХ ощутимо вырастет во Владимирской области
С 1 октября цены повысятся на 12,3% по сравнению с январем 2026 года. Максимальное повышение ожидается в пределах 17,1%, сообщила министр госрегулирования цен и тарифов региона Мария Новоселова. В Белом доме оправдываются, что у нас в области еще не все печально, по темпам роста мы в «серединке»среди 18 областей ЦФО.
Чтобы понять, как изменятся тарифы, приведу…
Приехали с кучей посылок на горячо любимую Почту России, а там вот...При чем еще на прошлой неделе режим был другой. Вопрос только почему Озон работает как часы, 24/7 до 22, девочки там приветливые и готовы всегда помочь. А здесь отправка посылок в несколько раз дороже, вечно какие то проблемы с доставкой, да и с самой работой почты. Не хотят терять десятилетиями встраиваемый имидж?
❗️ Налог на восстановление объектов после атак дронов скоро начнут платить россияне.
Его могут ввести уже осенью.
В части учёта расходов на оборону и на восстановление объектов. Мы совместно с отраслями прорабатываем, какие требуются изменения в налоговое законодательство. Понятно, что нужны изменения. Я думаю, что мы их осенью внесём, — сказал замминистра финансов Алексей Сазанов.
🕷 Арахнофобы тут?
4 см. паучиха с детьми у себя на спине ползает на даче
🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 188 posts we hold for @incident33. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Новости Владимира и Области @smi_vladimir · 37,269 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 5 September 2026
Владимир | События | Подслушано @Vladimir_podslushal · 36,050 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 September 2026
Владимирская Русь @rusvladimir · 31,705 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Инцидент Владимир🇷🇺” (@incident33), 49,070 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/incident33.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
