Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Immortal or Dead

Channel

Immortal or Dead

@immortal_or_dead

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

520subscribers

+164 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001357008767
TypeChannel
Username@immortal_or_dead
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/immortal_or_dead

Growth

355520437.57 August 2026 — 356 subscribers8 August 2026 — 355 subscribers15 August 2026 — 520 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +164. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 330–545 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 06:26520+165
8 Aug 2026, 06:12355-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:17356first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.6%
avg views ÷ 520 subscribers
Avg views / post
118
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (16 June 20263 August 2026)
Views total471
Reactions total37
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

184 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4222.8%
🔥3519.0%
👍2815.2%
💯115.98%
😁115.98%
🤡105.43%
🤣73.80%
💩63.26%
❤‍🔥52.72%
🤬52.72%
👎42.17%
😱42.17%
🤔42.17%
🥱42.17%
🖕31.63%
👻21.09%
10.543%
👾10.543%
🤷‍♂10.543%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC115 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну что можно сказать. Нужно ускорение в 10-30 раз. С моим мнением это совпадает. Все что мог сделать Федоров 100 лет назад - могилу себе позаметнее (войти в историю) Все что можем сделать мы - выкопать себе могилу получше (обратимая криопрезервация). Это все еще научная задача, но там хотя бы сложность ограничена одним полем. Может еще можем рассказать другим про нашу веру в прекрасное будущее, чтобы повысить шанс

💯42

3 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC89 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @longeconPhoto

Два месяца работал над расчетами и статьей про то насколько темп прогресса близок к Longevity Escape Velocity: Наконец-то публикую. Буду рад вашим мыслям, критике и фидбеку: - Substack А также лайкам и репостам: - LinkedIn - X/Twitter Экономика продления жизни. Стрыгин

🔥53🥱2💯1

1 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC135 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня прошел первый AntiMortality Circle людей, которые пишут о продлении жизни. Обычно конференции о продлении жизни это технологический парад, но мы вместо этого устроили парад concerns (лучше всего перевести как "беспокойств"). Было человек 20, среди прочих: - Петер Восс (который придумал термин AGI) - Наташа Мор и Макс Мор (экстропианцы, еще Алькор сделали) - Рендел Коэн (который сделал Carboncopies и занимает

👍5🔥31

1 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC132 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @radioimmortalityVideo

Дорогие друзья, надеюсь вы наслаждаетесь субботой. Как вы может быть всё ещё помните, мы сняли фильм про Гондурас, который вот вот выйдет на канале наших друзей Электробиопанк , а во время премьеры в кинотеатре Октябрь, мы ещё и пообщались со зрителями. И вот один из этих рилсов выдался просто гениальный! Идёт всего 30 секунд. Необходимо всячески помочь реакциями, комментами, репостами в инстаграме и/или на ютубе. Н

7🤣4

16 Jul 2026, 19:47 UTC331 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вот как надо Longevity Maxxить https://youtu.be/qRV-XzO_u0g?is=sy3AM2oTlpf8bmcW

4🔥2

14 Jul 2026, 21:16 UTC296 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Для трансплантации головы Уже есть: - лучшие кандидаты на вещество (5 кандидатов) для склеивания аксонов в спинном мозгу и периферических нервах Не хватает: - скотча который идеально зафиксирует отрезки спинного мозга относительно друг друга + кита для периферических нервов (нужен раунд на крысах) - из этих 5 кандидатов клея выявить 1 идеального кандидата (для этого нужен раунд на свиньях) - - дальше можно брать о

7🔥51❤‍🔥1💩1

8 Jul 2026, 21:52 UTC352 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Аналог сознания у ЛЛМ? https://www.anthropic.com/research/global-workspace

🖕3👍2🤔2👎1😱1

1 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC390 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как искать сильные проблемы для стартапов в эпоху AI Большинство problem discovery frameworks ищут существующую боль: интервьюируют пользователей, изучают workflow, считают важность проблемы, и т д. Но в существующей ситуации, когда стартапов как грязи, юзер сам ещё не осознаёт новую проблему. Она возникает не из старой неудовлетворённой потребности, а из того, что какой-то базовый экономический примитив внезапно с

👍6🤔1🥱1

30 Jun 2026, 21:28 UTC270 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Когда рассказываешь на нетворкинг вечере про пересадку головы и слышишь в ответ: "А у нас в Индии тоже много мифов про животных с головами людей!" Видите как-то же они там в мифах решили вопрос иммунной совместимости :)

😁10💯2

30 Jun 2026, 09:19 UTC288 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Общался вчера с чуваком, который придумал SEMA - способ создавать язык для агентов. Главная проблема. LLM-агенты постоянно теряют смысл (“semantic drift”), галлюцинируют и начинают по-разному понимать одни и те же слова. В масштабных агентных системах это становится критической проблемой. Идея. Сделать определения понятий неизменяемыми. Каждое понятие описывается в канонической форме и хэшируется. Главная новинка.

😱3🔥2

30 Jun 2026, 09:05 UTC236 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Помоему шикарная статья Турчина - ревизия взгляда на иммортализм с 2018 года на реалии 2026. Из интересного - сдвиг ожиданий по появлению лекарства за счет скорости прогресса в ИИ - лекарство ближе, а значит каждый год ценнее. Но к этому также хочется добавить, что наше понимание сложности старения, устройства прогресса, рынка и общества в целом также возросло, и, на мой взгляд, в этом улучшенном понимании ситуации

❤‍🔥42👍1🥱1

26 Jun 2026, 13:18 UTC291 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Все эти RAG конечно позор ИИ чудовищно не хватает гиппокампа... Надо как-то накодить искусственный гиппокамп

🤬5💯4🤡3🤣3🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @immortal_or_dead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 240,519 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Immortal or Dead” (@immortal_or_dead), 520 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/immortal_or_dead.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.