Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for پژوهشکده امام صادق ﴿ع﴾

Channel

پژوهشکده امام صادق ﴿ع﴾

@imam_sadiq_2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

274subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002435557585
TypeChannel
Username@imam_sadiq_2
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/imam_sadiq_2

Growth

2722742738 August 2026 — 272 subscribers8 August 2026 — 272 subscribers9 August 2026 — 273 subscribers15 August 2026 — 274 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 272–274 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:08274+1
9 Aug 2026, 00:54273+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:47272no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:15272first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.2%
avg views ÷ 274 subscribers
Avg views / post
58.1
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held17 (3 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total988
Reactions total32
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1856.3%
👌515.6%
👏515.6%
❤‍🔥412.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC19 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

📣 اعلامیه مناظره علمی و تخصصی گروه «پیشبرد دموکراسی» تقدیم می‌کند: موضوع مناظره: «تبیین و بررسی تطبیقی مفهوم توحید» با حضور اندیشمندان: تیمسار (دیدگاه شیعه علوی) ابوصالح عثمان (دیدگاه سنی عمری) 📅 زمان: شنبه | ساعت ۱۲:۱۵ الی ۱۳:۰۰ 📍 مکان: پلتفرم تلگرام (گروه پیشبرد دموکراسی) https://t.me/DemocracyAdvancementFoundation حضور برای تمامی علاقه‌مندان به مباحث الهیات و فلسفه دین آزاد است.

1

7 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC15 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ahlal_Sonat

✅ اعتراف به تواتر نزول آیہ ﴿إِنَّما يُرِيدُ اللَّهُ لِيُذْهِبَ عَنْكُمُ الرِّجْسَ أَهْلَ الْبَيْتِ وَ يُطَهِّرَكُمْ تَطْهِيراً﴾ در شأن اهل بیت مطهر رسول‌اللہ‌صلوات‌اللہ‌علیہ‌وآلہ توسطـ علماے اهل سنت ▬▭▬▭▬▭▬▭▬▭▬▭▬ 🔆 أقول: و الأخبار متواترة على نزول الآية الكريمة في أهل البيت (عليهم السلام) و هم بصريح أكثر تلك الأخبار المتواترة عليّ و فاطمة و الحسن و الحسين (صلوات اللَّه عليهم) 📚📚شواهد التنزيل لقواعد التفضيل جلد :

7 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC12 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ahlal_Sonat

┄┄┅━༅𖣔﷽𖣔༅━┅┄┄ ✅ پنج تن آل ڪساء و اهل‌البیت حقیقے و خاص رسول‌اللہ‌صلوات‌اللہ‌علیہ‌وآلہ (علے‌(ع)_ حضرت فاطمه(س)_ حسنین(ع)) متواتر معنوے است ▬▭▬▭▬▭▬▭▬▭▬▭▬ ❶ آیةاللہ‌‌العظمے‌ علے‌علیہ‌السلام • ❷ ڪریم اهل‌البیت الإمام الحسن علیہ‌السلام • ❸ ام‌المؤمنین ام سلمہ سلام‌اللہ‌علیها • ❹ عبد اللہ بن عباس • ❺ سعد بن أبے وقاص • ❻ عبد اللہ بن جعفر الطیار • ❼ عمر بن أبے سلمہ • ❽ واثلہ بن الأسقع • ❾ أنس بن مالڪ • ❿ أبے الحمراء • ❶❶ عا

7 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC16 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ahlal_Sonat

❼ عن عطاء، عن 👈🏿عمر بن أبي سلمة،👉🏿 قال: نزلت هذه الآية على النبي صَلَّى الله عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّم وهو في بيت أم سلمة (إِنَّمَا يَرِيدُ اللَّهُ لِيُذْهِبَ عَنْكُمُ الرِّجْسَ أَهْلَ الْبَيْتِ وَيُطَهِّرَكُمْ تَطْهِيرًا) فدعا حسنا وحسينا وفاطمة فأجلسهم بين يديه، ودعا عليا فأجلسه خلفه، فتجلل هو وهم بالكساء ثم قال: "هَؤُلاءِ أَهْلُ بَيْتِي، فَأَذْهِبْ عَنْهُمُ الرِّجْسَ وَطَهِّرْهُمْ تَطْهِيرًا". 📔📖تفسير الطبرے = جامع البيان

6 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC24 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @fyudivePhoto

تجسیم خدا متعال نزد اهل سنت🕋 از مبانی اهل سنت تجسیم خداوند هست و توصیف خداوند متعال با صفات بشري از کار های اهل سنت و وهابی ها هست العثیمین عالم بزرگ سلفی در باره معنای الاستواء در آیه شریفه ثُمَّ ٱسۡتَوَىٰ عَلَى ٱلۡعَرۡشِۖ میگوید خدا بر عرش استقرار و مستقر شد 📚شرح العقیده الواسطیه جلد۱ صفحه ۳۷۵ در حالی که مستقر شدن و استقرار به اعتراف خود علمای اهل سنت صفت بشري هست و خدا به صفت محدود بشر توصیف نمیشود 📚موسوعه الاالبا

👏3

5 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC22 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ahlal_Sonat

┄┄┅━༅𖣔﷽𖣔༅━┅┄┄ ✅ اسناد صحیح آیه ولایت ▬▭▬▭▬▭▬▭▬▭▬▭▬ ❶ أخبرنا أبو سعد [6] المطرز وأبو علي الحداد وأبو القاسم غانم بن محمد بن عبيد الله ثم أخبرنا أبو المعالي عبد الله بن أحمد بن محمد أنا أبو علي الحداد قالوا أنا أبو نعيم الحافظ نا سليمان بن أحمد [7] نا عبد الرحمن بن محمد بن سالم الرازي [8] نا محمد بن يحيى بن ضريس العبدي نا عيسى بن عبد الله بن عبيد الله بن عمر بن علي بن أبي طالب حدثني أبي عن أبيه عن جده عن علي قال نزلت

1👏1

5 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ahlal_Sonat

┄┄┅━༅𖣔﷽𖣔༅━┅┄┄ ✅ آیه ولایت بصورت متواتر در شأن مبارک امیرالمومنین علے‌علیہ‌السلام است ▬▭▬▭▬▭▬▭▬▭▬▭▬ ❶ آیةاللہ‌‌العظمے‌ علے‌علیہ‌السلام • ❷ عبد اللہ‌ بن عبــاس • ❸ أبے‌ رافع • ❹ جابر بن عبد اللہ‌ • ❺ عبد اللہ‌ بن سـلام • ❻ أبوذر غفارے‌ • ❼ عبایہ‌ بن ربعے‌ • ❽ مقداد بن أسـود • ❾ عمار بن یاسـر • ❿ أنس بن مالڪ • -ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ ❶ قالَ الطَّبَرَانِيُّ: ثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ س

1

5 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ahlal_Sonat

❻ وَرُوِيَ 👈🏿عَنْ أَبِي ذَرٍّ👉🏿 رَضِيَ اللَّه عَنْهُ أَنَّهُ قَالَ: صَلَّيْتُ مَعَ رَسُولِ اللَّه صَلَّى اللَّه عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يَوْمًا صَلَاةَ الظُّهْرِ، فَسَأَلَ سَائِلٌ فِي الْمَسْجِدِ فَلَمْ يُعْطِهِ أَحَدٌ، فَرَفَعَ السَّائِلُ يَدَهُ إِلَى السَّمَاءِ وَقَالَ: اللَّهُمَّ اشْهَدْ أَنِّي سَأَلْتُ فِي مَسْجِدِ الرَّسُولِ صَلَّى اللَّه عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَمَا أَعْطَانِي أَحَدٌ شَيْئًا، وَعَلِيٌّ عَلَيْهِ السَّلَا

1

5 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC20 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AliZulfiqar9Photo

پاسخ به شبهه وهابی ها 👇

5 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC24 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AliZulfiqar9

سلام ✋️ وهابی ها شبهه کردن که بله در روایت شیعه آمده خداوند دیده میشود 🤔 از مبنای اهل سنت دیدن خداوند هست که اشکلات فروانی بر این نظریه هست دیده شدن خدا موجب جسم بودن و مکان داشتن خدای متعال است 📚کشف المراد صفحه ۲۹۷ حالا برای جمع کردن عقیده فاسد خود شبهه کردن که در روایت شیعه نیز این موضوع موجود هست جواب : فارغ از بحث انتساب کتاب تفسیر قمی به صاحب آن اگر روایت مورد استناد همان معنای که وهابیت میگوید را داشته‌ باشد

1

5 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC23 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @fyudivePhoto

روش قدیمی اخباری ها ✍️ امروز شاهد تهمت ها و توهين های اخباری ها نسبت به علما هستیم و جالب است روش قدمای و بزرگان اخباری ها همین بوده است مرحوم کاشف الغطاء در باره میرزا محمد اخباری و نسب او به علما می‌نویسد: این موضوع از جانب تو شهرت یافته و گروهی شهادت داده‌اند که از تو سر زده است. این امر، نسبت دادن چنین کاری به آن سرورمان سید محسن (کاظمی) است که او لواط در برخی اشخاص را حلال دانسته 📚دو رساله از کاشف الغطاء...صفحه۱

5 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC23 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ahlal_Sonat

┄┄┅━༅𖣔﷽𖣔༅━┅┄┄ ✅ بهشتے‌ بودن علے‌علیہ‌السلام، و شیعیان علے‌علیہ‌السلام متواتر است ▬▭▬▭▬▭▬▭▬▭▬▭▬ ❶ آیة‌اللہ‌العظمي علے‌علیہ‌السلام • ❷ عَبداللـہ إبـن عباس • ❸ مُعاذ إبن جبــــل • ❹ اُم‌سَلَمة زَوج النبـے • ❺ أبے‌هُرَیرَة • ❻ أبے سَعید الخُدرے • ❼ جابِر إِبن عَبدالله الأنصارے • ❽ نَضلَةَ الْأَسْلَمِےّ أَبِےبَرْزَةَ • ❾ أبے بُرَیــدة • ❿ أبا مریم السلولے • -ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ ❶ وَأخرج ابْن مرْدَوَ

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @imam_sadiq_2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 145,061 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“پژوهشکده امام صادق ﴿ع﴾” (@imam_sadiq_2), 274 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imam_sadiq_2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.