Channel
@AliZulfiqar9
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
98subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002214691395 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AliZulfiqar9 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AliZulfiqar9 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 98 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 97 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 97 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (16 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 702 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 80.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
تجسیم خدا متعال نزد اهل سنت🕋 از مبانی اهل سنت تجسیم خداوند هست و توصیف خداوند متعال با صفات بشري از کار های اهل سنت و وهابی ها هست العثیمین عالم بزرگ سلفی در باره معنای الاستواء در آیه شریفه ثُمَّ ٱسۡتَوَىٰ عَلَى ٱلۡعَرۡشِۖ میگوید خدا بر عرش استقرار و مستقر شد 📚شرح العقیده الواسطیه جلد۱ صفحه ۳۷۵ در حالی که مستقر شدن و استقرار به اعتراف خود علمای اهل سنت صفت بشري هست و خدا به صفت محدود بشر توصیف نمیشود 📚موسوعه الاالبا…
سلام ✋️ وهابی ها شبهه کردن که بله در روایت شیعه آمده خداوند دیده میشود 🤔 از مبنای اهل سنت دیدن خداوند هست که اشکلات فروانی بر این نظریه هست دیده شدن خدا موجب جسم بودن و مکان داشتن خدای متعال است 📚کشف المراد صفحه ۲۹۷ حالا برای جمع کردن عقیده فاسد خود شبهه کردن که در روایت شیعه نیز این موضوع موجود هست جواب : فارغ از بحث انتساب کتاب تفسیر قمی به صاحب آن اگر روایت مورد استناد همان معنای که وهابیت میگوید را داشته باشد …
پاسخ به شبهه وهابی ها 👇
بسمه تعالی کانال «مذهب أهل السنة والجماعة» 📖 معرفی مذهب حقیقی صحابه 🗂 بررسی اسناد و مدارک تاریخی و روایی 📝 نقدیهها و ردیهها 🆔 @Ahlal_Sonat 🔍 زیر نظر مجموعه امام صادق ﴿ص﴾
👏1
تأثیر دین در زندگی 🏠 دین با معارف خود و جهان بینی که به انسان میدهد باعث این میشود که حیات بشر منظم و انسانی بشود و خلاصه چه خود فرد و چه جامعه را به سمت کمال ببرد برای مثال تاثیر دین بر کمک به افراد و خیریه ها مایکل ارگیل روان شناس معروف غیر مسلمان در این باره مینویسد: افراد دیندار بیش از دو برابر افراد بیدین در امور خیریه از قبیل انجام فعالیت اجتماعی درگیر میشوند این مطلب از محتویات تعالیم دینی مورد انتظار است 📚…
سلام ✋️ نواصب شبهه کردن که برعکس عقیده شیعه مبنی بر افضلیت اهل بیت بر پیامبران غیر از خاتم الانبیا در منابع شیعه روایت شده که امام صادق و باقر فرمودند خیر مقام ما پاین تر از انبيا است 🤔 ناصبی با وقاحت تمام متن ترجمه را تحریف کرده بلکه در متن چیزی به نام ولی [در حد] انبیا نبودند نیست بله ترجمه صحیح این است آن دو عالم بودند اما پیامبر نبودند پس فهم غلط ناصبی ناشی از اشتباه در ترجمه یا شاید ترجمه از قصد برای حق جلوه د…
❤1
پاسخ به شبهه نواصب ✍️
اهميت احکام و قوانین و معارف دین بر زندگی 🌍 مرحوم شهید صدر رحمة الله علیه در کتاب خود مینویسد : الحكم الشرعى هو التشريع الصادر من الله تعالى لتنظيم حياة الإنسان حکم شرعی عبارت است از تشریع و قانون الهی صادر شده از خداوند متعال برای تنظیم(ساختار ) حیات انسان 📚قواعد کلی استنباط جلد ۱ صفحه ۱۳۹_۱۴۰ در اصلا احکام و معارف الهی برای رساندن انسان به کمال و تنظیم زندگی هدف مند انسان است و قطعا برای انسان مفید است
❤1
سلام ✋️ نواصب مثل همیشه از روی بی عقلی و درک کم خود شبهه وارد کردن که آیت الله سید صادق روحانی فرموده اسم گذاری به نام خلفا دلالت بر دوستی اهل بیت با خلفا ندارد و ما هم قبلا به شبهه نام گذاری فرزندان اهل بیت به اسم خلفا را پاسخ دادم که اینجا میتوانید مشاهده بفرمایید 👇 https://t.me/AliZulfiqar9/364 این فرد بی سواد خبر ندارن خود علمای اهل سنت مثل ابن تیمیه هم چنین حرفی را زده که نام گذاری بر اسم کافر ترین مردم هم دل…
❤1
پاسخ به نواصب احمق
جایز بودن تقلید 📖 مرحوم فیض کاشانی که از علمای اخباری که از او کلمات و سخنانی در رد علمای اصولی نقل شده و در کتاب های خود بر آنها تاخته در کتاب خود در باره تقلید مینویسد: أقول: تحقيق الكلام في هذا المقام أنّ المجتهد إن أفتى بمحكمات الكتاب والسنة وأخبار أهل البيت الا جاز الاعتماد على قوله مطلقاً میگویم: تحقیق سخن در این مقام آن است که اگر مجتهد بر پایه محکمات کتاب و سنت و اخبار اهلبیت فتوا دهد اعتماد بر گفتهی او ب…
❤1
برائت از خلفا نشانه شیعه بودن 📖 از چیزی های که زیدیه به آن گرفتار شد بدعت قبول داشتن خلفای غاصب بود و یکی از مهم ترین اختلاف های شيعه و زیدیه همین مورد است شیخ حاکم جشمی که از علمای زیدیه هست در این باره مینویسد: فكل من شتم الصحابة لا يقول بإمامة زيد ويقول بإمامة المعينين وبالنص والمعجز فهو رافضي پس هر کس صحابه را دشنام دهد به امامت زید قائل نباشد و به امامت معین و (اثبات امامت)از طریق نص و معجزه باور داشته باشد …
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @AliZulfiqar9. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 226,970 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ذوالفقار :پاسخ به شبهات” (@AliZulfiqar9), 98 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AliZulfiqar9.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.