Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
29,900 average views per post against 2,394 subscribers — an engagement rate of 1247.1%. Across the 15,813 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 8.34% and 32.3%, with a median of 17.2%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
115 of 115 published in the window (22 exact, 93 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
3,433,283
Mature posts only
2672.3% over 41 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -904,599. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 15:54
2,394
-899,140
11 Aug 2026, 15:42
901,534
-1,701
10 Aug 2026, 15:22
903,235
-1,291
9 Aug 2026, 16:32
904,526
-656
8 Aug 2026, 15:01
905,182
-1,215
7 Aug 2026, 15:25
906,397
-596
6 Aug 2026, 19:30
906,993
first reading
Engagement
115 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1247.1%
avg views ÷ 2,394 subscribers
Avg views / post
29,900
115 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.688%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
115
of 115 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 101 of 115 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
115 (3 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
3,433,283
Reactions total
23,590
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 06s
Average length
43s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 2,422 interp. → 3.0 hours: 4,430 → 6.0 hours: 8,320still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
6.0 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
23,590 reactions across 100 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
12,592
53.4%
❤
6,415
27.2%
💔
2,813
11.9%
👍
1,562
6.62%
🔥
208
0.882%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 115 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,590reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 115 we hold a reading for · 0.9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iMTProxy_ir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 115 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎲 با اولین شارژ 🤩🤩🤩درصد شارژ بیشتر بگیر
🎲 بازگشت هفتگی 🤩🤩 درصد
🎲 هر واریز با کریتپو 🤩🤩 درصد هدیه بگیر
🎲ورود به سایت و دریافت بونوس ۳۰۰ درصد
👇🏻👇🏻
🎲 🌐winro.io🎲
کانال اخبار و هدایا👇🏻
🌐Telegram
🎲 باشگاه VIP برنامه وفاداری وینرو برای بازیکنان فعال است که با مزایای انحصاری پاداش میدهد .
کلیک کنید
🚨سطح 1 برنزی :
✅ 35 میلیون ریال هدیه ی ارتقا سطح.
✅ 3.5 میلیون ریال هدیه روزانه.
✅ بازگشت هفتگی
🚨 ورود به باشگاه VIP 💎
🎲ثبت نام آسان و سریع کلیک کنید🎲
✅🛍پیشبینی با ضرایب بالا
✅🤩🤩🤩🤩 بونوس اولین واریز
✅🤩🤩🤩بونوس واریز کریپتو
✅تا🤩🤩🤩🤩 بونوس روی برگههای ترکیبی
✅پخش زنده ی تمام مسابقات 🎰
✅درگاه اختصاصی برای کاربران 💰
…
از چتجیبیتی پرسیدم اگه بخوام مانع پیشرفت خودم بشم باید چیکار کنم؟
این جوابهای جالب رو داد:
۱. مدام خودتو دست کم بگیر
۲. منتظر تأیید بقیه باش
۳. صبر کن همه چیز «کامل» بشه بعد شروع کن
۴. به گذشته بچسب
۵. از شکست بترس
۶. خودتو با بقیه مقایسه کن
۷. دنبال رضایت همه باش
۸. به ندای درونت شک کن
۹. آرزوهات رو عقب بنداز... برای "یه روزی"
پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی
پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی
پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی
پروکسی |…
افرادی که بیش از حد فکر میکنند، تمایل زیادی به ایجاد مشکل برای خودشون دارن، مشکلاتی که از ابتدا اصلا وجود نداشته!
99 درصد چیزای بدی که بهش فکر میکنید، هرگز اتفاق نمیافته!
پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی
پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی
پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی
پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی
پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی
✅ @feriproxy 👇
👑 @ProxyNJ 🌐
⚠️ همین حالا موجودیتو 🤩 برابر کن❌
☑️2.5 میلیون شارژ کن 10 میلیون شارژ شو
✅ برای اولین واریز تا 15 شهریور ، 0️⃣0️⃣3️⃣ درصد بیشتر در وینرو شارژ شو 🎁
✅ به ازای 3 واریز اول در وینرو به ترتیب 300 ، 150 ، 75 درصد بیشتر شارژ شوید .
🔊با شارژ اضافی بدون ریسک بازی کن سرمایتو چند برابر کن ⚡️
🎲ثبت نام آسان و سریع کلیک کنید
✅درگاه اختصاصی برای کاربران💰
✅پخش زنده ی تمام مسابقات
🔊اپلیکیشن حرفه ای 📱
🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲 معتبرترین سایت ا…
🎲همین امشب با اولین شارژ 🤩🤩🤩 درصد شارژ بیشتر بگیر
همین الان شانست رو با موجودی اضافی امتحان کن حتما برنده میشی👌
👇🏻👇🏻 r20
🌐Telegram🎲 🌐winro.io🎲
🤣4
Showing the 12 most recent of 115 posts we hold for @iMTProxy_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 143,661 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
5
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
5
vacant every time we have ever looked
@iMTProxy_ir named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@malosak named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@akhtarshenasi named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@confing named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@jazb_eshgh named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@textam named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Proxyir | پروکسی @proxyir · 424,539 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
پروکسی >| PROXY @proxycpu · 188,247 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 August 2026
PROXY || پروکسی @ProxyNP · 899,441 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 August 2026
Proxym | پروکسیم @proxym · 188,636 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
پروکسی ملی | Proxy MTProto @Poroximel · 280,253 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محافظ imtproxy_ir@” (@iMTProxy_ir), 2,394 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iMTProxy_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
