سرور جدید پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی
🤣4❤3

Channel
@proxyiranis
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · What this channel posts · View velocity · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,398,913subscribers
+197,209 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1002235592095 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @proxyiranis |
| Description | جهت رزرو تبلیغ اسپانسری به آیدی زیر پیام بدید @CHATCA1 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/proxyiranis |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
On 4 of the 756 posts we watched over 30 days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.0086 reactions per view.
| Post | Over | Views | Reactions | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| /1288912 Oct 2026, 09:23 UTC | 51 minutes | 16,100 → 20,500at least +4,300 | 70 → 76at most +7 | +36.9 |
| /1297515 Oct 2026, 06:21 UTC | 35 minutes | 12,800 → 15,500at least +2,600 | 78 → 81at most +4 | +22.3 |
| /1306317 Oct 2026, 17:41 UTC | 31 minutes | 20,100 → 23,700at least +3,500 | 185 → 191at most +7 | +30.0 |
| /1325324 Oct 2026, 06:08 UTC | 30 minutes | 7,180 → 8,660at least +1,470 | 56 → 58at most +3 | +12.6 |
Expected is the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).
What this does and does not say. It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.
Recorded under the key view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 03:06 | 1,398,913 | -8,310 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 14:50 | 1,407,223 | -7,690 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 08:07 | 1,414,913 | -7,219 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 00:06 | 1,422,132 | -6,148 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 03:27 | 1,428,280 | -5,788 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 03:48 | 1,434,068 | -6,258 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 02:31 | 1,440,326 | -10,023 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:30 | 1,450,349 | -6,316 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:10 | 1,456,665 | -5,653 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:30 | 1,462,318 | -291 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:30 | 1,462,609 | -6,120 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:14 | 1,468,729 | -6,895 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:49 | 1,475,624 | -6,644 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 10:49 | 1,482,268 | -5,482 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:12 | 1,487,750 | -6,366 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:19 | 1,494,116 | -7,124 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:01 | 1,501,240 | -6,361 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:15 | 1,507,601 | -8,499 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:27 | 1,516,100 | -8,197 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:58 | 1,524,297 | first reading |
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 758 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (1 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 559 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 4.1 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 25.6% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 70.2% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 27,900 views — 1.99% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 35,170).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /1368011 Nov 2026, 04:38 UTC | 32 minutes – 38 minutes old | 1,640 views ~6 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 18 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1367910 Nov 2026, 19:55 UTC | 1630 minutes – 9.3 hours old | 12,000 views ~346 reactions | 60 minutes: 6,009 interp. → 3.0 hours: 8,420 → 6.0 hours: 9,240still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 60 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1367810 Nov 2026, 19:50 UTC | 174 minutes – 9.4 hours old | 11,900 views ~20 reactions | 60 minutes: 5,923 interp. → 3.0 hours: 8,393 interp. → 6.0 hours: 9,280still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 61 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1367710 Nov 2026, 19:28 UTC | 1727 minutes – 9.8 hours old | 12,800 views ~240 reactions | 60 minutes: 7,080 → 3.0 hours: 9,810 → 6.0 hours: 10,600still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 50 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1367610 Nov 2026, 17:56 UTC | 2019 minutes – 11 hours old | 17,200 views ~277 reactions | 60 minutes: 6,918 interp. → 3.0 hours: 14,100 → 6.0 hours: 15,600still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 89 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1367510 Nov 2026, 17:54 UTC | 2022 minutes – 11 hours old | 11,200 views ~25 reactions | 60 minutes: 3,906 interp. → 3.0 hours: 8,970 → 6.0 hours: 10,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.7 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1367410 Nov 2026, 17:29 UTC | 2116 minutes – 12 hours old | 15,000 views ~265 reactions | 60 minutes: 6,962 interp. → 3.0 hours: 12,700 → 6.0 hours: 14,053 interp. → 12 hours: 15,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 69 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1367310 Nov 2026, 16:02 UTC | 253 minutes – 13 hours old | 17,700 views ~359 reactions | 60 minutes: 4,880 → 3.0 hours: 12,214 interp. → 6.0 hours: 16,472 interp. → 12 hours: 17,300still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.9 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
سرور جدید پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی
🤣4❤3
تلگرام وقتی منتشر شد این شکلی بود. کیا یادشونه ؟ همراه اول | ایرانسل پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی ⭐ @proxyiranis
❤218👍84😭32👎18💔1
✈️ شروع طلایی در VOREXBET 🎁 هدیهٔ اولین واریز🤧 0️⃣0️⃣3️⃣🔤 بونوس، فقط برای پیشبینی مسابقات ورزشی 💸 با اولین واریز 🔢 میلیون تومانی میتوانید 🔢 میلیون تومان اعتبار ورزشی بگیرید 🚫 فرصت دریافت این بونوس محدود است.🚫 🌐ثبتنام در VOREXBET 😀ورکس بت، مقصدی نهایی👇 🌐 https://vorexbet.com/ 😊خبرها، هدیهها و پیشنهادهای بعدی رو توی تلگرام ببین👇 🔴https://t.me/+QW5naCf_Q_ZkODk0 🔴https://t.me/+QW5naCf_Q_ZkODk0
❤11🖕10
دقایقی پیش، سکوی گاز SPD14D پارس جنوبی دچار آتشسوزی شد، در پی این حادثه، ۵۰۰ میلیون فوت مکعب گاز از مدار تولید خارج شد، که احتمال کمبود گاز برای زمستون رو افزایش میده. همراه اول | ایرانسل پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی ⭐ @proxyiranis
💔140🤣38😐15🗿13❤10🖕8😭7👍6
👈سخنگوی سپاه: حتی جنگندههای آمریکایی از نوع F-35 نیز نتوانستند به نفتکشهای متخلف برای عبور کمک کنند. همراه اول | ایرانسل پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی ⭐ @proxyiranis
❤119🖕83🤣39🤡17👍10❤🔥6👎4
🎁 این جعبه، هدیهٔ اولین واریزته! ⚡️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩 بونوس اولین واریز در VOREXBET 🤧 فقط برای بخش ورزشی 😘 بازیای که منتظرشی رو انتخاب کن. با اولین شارژت، بونوس ورزشی بگیر و پیشبینی مسابقه رو با اعتبار بیشتری شروع کن. 💰 🤩 میلیون تومان واریز ←🤩 میلیون تومان اعتبار بونوس ورزشی ✅ این هدیه برای مدت محدوده 🌐 ثبتنام در VOREXBET 😀ورکس بت، مقصدی نهایی👇 🌐 https://vorexbet.com/ 😊 خبرها، هدیهها و پیشنهادهای بعدی رو توی تلگرام ببین 👇…
❤7👎7👍6🖕4😍2
نتانیاهو: ایران در حال تلاش برای تجدید برنامه هستهای خود است و تنها راه رفع این تهدید، سرنگونی رژیم آن است. همراه اول | ایرانسل پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی ⭐ @proxyiranis
👍148🖕83🤣13💩7❤6🗿5🔥4🕊2
این بچه های بلوچیه ناز و زیبایی که میبینید برای به دست آوردن یه تیکه نون از صبح تا شب کنار جاده بنزین میفروشن. همراه اول | ایرانسل پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی ⭐ @proxyiranis
💔303😭24❤13💩6❤🔥4👎3🕊3🖕3
ویدیویی وایرال شده از عروسی یه زوج تهرانی که آقا دوماد واسه کادوی به عروس خانوم یه i8 به قیمت ۳۰ میلیارد تومن هدیه داده. حالا اگر ما جشن عروسی بگیریم ، نهایت حمایت فک و فامیل یه پتوی دو نفرهست همراه اول | ایرانسل پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی ⭐ @proxyiranis
🤣183❤54💔34💩19👎10🖕8❤🔥2👍2
🎁 این جعبه، هدیهٔ اولین واریزته! ⚡️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩 بونوس اولین واریز در VOREXBET 🤧 فقط برای بخش ورزشی 😘 بازیای که منتظرشی رو انتخاب کن. با اولین شارژت، بونوس ورزشی بگیر و پیشبینی مسابقه رو با اعتبار بیشتری شروع کن. 💰 🤩 میلیون تومان واریز ←🤩 میلیون تومان اعتبار بونوس ورزشی ✅ این هدیه برای مدت محدوده 🌐 ثبتنام در VOREXBET 😀ورکس بت، مقصدی نهایی👇 🌐 https://vorexbet.com/ 😊 خبرها، هدیهها و پیشنهادهای بعدی رو توی تلگرام ببین 👇…
ایران مهدعجایبه، سمند سورن پلاک گذر هم اومد : همراه اول | ایرانسل پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی ⭐ @proxyiranis
🤣244😐19❤17💔6
یکی از بلاگرای مملکت میخواست تولید محتوا کنه که یکی از هموطنان، این صحنه زیبا رو خلق کرد: همراه اول | ایرانسل پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی |پروکسی ⭐ @proxyiranis
🤣220❤16👍5💔5
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @proxyiranis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@proxyiranis edited 16 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 244 posts on @proxyiranis as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@proxyiranis named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Proxy MTProto پروکسی ایرانی” (@proxyiranis), 1,398,913 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proxyiranis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.