Официальный канал клуба HR-Tech Club и событий серии HR-TechDay.ru с февраля 2024 года.
Предложить спикерство/выступление — @anaarifullina и @dina_ibh
Пригласить на событие — @ivan_hub
Стать партнером — @annecdot и @aleksei_kuritsyn
Не отвечаем? @yanvit
Created
Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 500–502 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 04:18
501
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:11
501
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.9%
avg views ÷ 501 subscribers
Avg views / post
155
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
18 (8 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
2,324
Reactions total
27
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 04:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
374
Videos
44
Links
309
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
39 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
14
35.9%
👍
13
33.3%
😁
6
15.4%
✍
2
5.13%
🙏
2
5.13%
❤
1
2.56%
🤔
1
2.56%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hrtechday. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Исследование стажёрских и лидерских программ от FutureToday: последняя возможность принять участие
Коллеги из FutureToday завершают традиционное ежегодное исследование программ для молодых специалистов, но к нему еще можно присоединиться. Это возможность увидеть актуальную ситуацию на рынке труда молодых специалистов и сравнить свои программы с рынком.
Исследование проходит в два этапа:
– Анализ программ для молод…
🎙️ Запросы на комментарии в СМИ
Перешлите своим коллегам из PR и знакомым спикерам по горящим запросам СМИ. Отвечать на запросы нужно на агрегаторе Прессфид
Рынок труда в IT в 2026 году в Петербурге ДО 3 АВГУСТА
https://pressfeed.ru/query/200146?pfref=4271846620d203fd0511c422d483cdbd
Охотники за компенсациями: как работодателю защититься от сотрудника-провокатора ДО 7 АВГУСТА
https://pressfeed.ru/query/200166?pfre…
Зарплата.Журнал: Почему самые надежные и беспроблемные сотрудники вдруг приносят заявление на увольнение
https://pressfeed.ru/query/200175?pfref=4271846620d203fd0511c422d483cdbd
Приглашаем психологов и HR разобрать болезненную для любого руководителя ситуацию: когда самые лояльные, ответственные и профессиональные сотрудники внезапно увольняются без предупреждений и скандалов. Перечисляем психологические причины — в…
Зарплата.Журнал: Что такое ИИ-нативность и почему ее так ценят на рынке труда
https://pressfeed.ru/query/200176?pfref=4271846620d203fd0511c422d483cdbd
Приглашаем HR и руководителей для экспертных комментариев по теме ИИ-нативности - в контексте навыков кандидата/сотрудника.
Что будет в статье.
Знакомим читателей с новым термином. Объясняем простыми словами суть, показываем на примерах, что этот навык стал появляться…
Деловой Петербург: Рынок труда в IT в 2026 году в Петербурге
https://pressfeed.ru/query/200146?pfref=4271846620d203fd0511c422d483cdbd
Редакция «Делового Петербурга» готовит материал о ситуации на рынке труда в IT-сфере Санкт-Петербурга. Мы опираемся на данные hh.ru за первое полугодие 2026 года.
Для полноты картины нам нужны комментарии от крупных игроков рынка с репрезентативной выборкой. Интересно мнение HR-дирек…
🤖 Когда скорость ответа напрямую влияет на найм, автоматизация становится конкурентным преимуществом
✔️ Один из клиентов ChatBoost – компания HR Альянс, которая ежемесячно обрабатывает 100 000+ откликов и нанимает персонал для крупнейших федеральных сетей ритейла и общепита.
❌ Проблема была в скорости реакции. Кандидаты массовых вакансий откликаются сразу в несколько компаний, и первый, кто выходит на связь, чаще в…
🎁 РОЗЫГРЫШ
Друзья разыгрывают наборы уникальных детских опытов MEL Science, которые подойдут в качестве корпоративного подарка детям друзей и коллег, а также будут интересны и взрослым ("мальчик 42 лет и девочка 32 лет интересуются").
Можно выиграть наборы:
- Аптека (ценой 5000₽)
- Терапия (ценой 5000₽)
- Химия Кислорода (ценой 1600₽)
- Оловянное Дерево (ценой 1600₽)
👤 На наборы летом действуют большие скидки, для…
Перспективное развитие: Сотрудники как источники идей для развития бизнеса
https://pressfeed.ru/query/199826?pfref=4271846620d203fd0511c422d483cdbd
Добрый день, уважаемые коллеги!
Ищу героев (предпринимателей, эйчар-специалистов, руководителей компаний), которые бы рассказали, как идеи сотрудников помогают развивать бизнес.
Лучшие истории будут оформлены в отдельные монологи от лица спикеров, с их фотографиями и до…
Вечерняя Москва: 40—летние сотрудники закрывают кадровый дефицит
https://pressfeed.ru/query/199493?pfref=4271846620d203fd0511c422d483cdbd
Для материала в деловой выпуск газеты «Вечерняя Москва», посвященному специалистам «за 40» нужны комментарии HR, социологов, психологов и тд
После данным сервисов для поиска работы в последнее время работодатели все чаще ищут сотрудников старше 40 лет. Таких кандидатов называют с…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @hrtechday. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 232,731 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HR-Tech Day - события про HR-Tech🤝” (@hrtechday), 501 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hrtechday.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.