Канал про крутые и эффективные подходы к рекрутменту, на которых мы зарабатываем каждый день прямо сейчас.
Чат для общения @HRomosoma_Recr
https://clck.ru/35fdWa база знаний канала - здесь много полезного
По вопросам сотрудничества @MariDoz
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,641–7,648 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 19:11
7,642
-3
8 Aug 2026, 16:34
7,645
-2
7 Aug 2026, 21:30
7,647
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:20
7,647
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.67%
avg views ÷ 7,642 subscribers
Avg views / post
586
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (22 January 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
1,172
Reactions total
28
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
325
Videos
26
Links
359
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
376 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
127
33.8%
🔥
115
30.6%
custom 5440792874683744373
53
14.1%
custom 5280854765096416446
34
9.04%
👍
23
6.12%
👏
10
2.66%
🤣
4
1.06%
🍾
3
0.798%
🤝
3
0.798%
🗿
2
0.532%
💯
1
0.266%
😭
1
0.266%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 376reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 20 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hirockits. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 January 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
474
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,320
over 19 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFH7Lb9K
1
6 August 2026
6 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 6 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Коллеги, обратите внимание на конференцию, которая ближе к вам, чем кажется.
10–11 сентября в Новосибирске пройдет TeamLead Сибирь — конференция для тимлидов и руководителей. Заметная часть программы про то, что вы разбираете каждый день: как нанимать и удерживать людей, растить руководителей и справляться с выгоранием.
Из практики:
🔸 мастер-класс по модели SCARF: как вывести команду из обороны в сотрудничество
🔸…
Нанимающий менеджер регулярно отказывает кандидатам, но не даёт развёрнутый фидбэк?
Или причины отказа каждый раз разные, а общее впечатление сводится к: «Вроде подходит, но что-то не то».
И иногда задавать открытые вопросы (Что именно не подошло? Кого вы хотите видеть?) не помогает, потому что проблема не в том, что нанимающий менеджер не хочет объяснять, а бывает, ему самому сложно сформулировать, по каким призна…
По мотивам вчерашнего поста с исследованием. Последние несколько месяцев мы проектируем антифрод систему для проверки кандидатов и тестируем антифрод механики. Сейчас берём несколько компаний на тестовые запуски, чтобы обкатать на количестве — по очень приемлемой цене, которая не потребует значительного согласования бюджета. Уже работаем с двумя компаниями и результаты впечатляют — действительно вскрывается фрод там …
Фрод в найме стал массовым
В начале года мы проводили масштабное исследование по проблеме кандидатского фрода, в котором вы тоже принимали участие.
Результаты исследования опубликовали на портале TheHRD.
В исследовании приняли участие 300 респондентов: 88,7% сталкивались с фродом за последний год, 35% — регулярно.
Самые частые форматы: накрутка опыта, искажение роли, подсказки на интервью, фейковые компании, совм…
Вакансия Executive Recruiter
Мы ищем Executive рекрутера для успешной EdTech-компании, находящейся в фазе большой трансформации.
Компания активно растет и запускает новые направления. В связи с этим появляется большое количество нестандартных управленческих ролей, и нам нужен рекрутер, который станет стратегическим партнером СЕО и поможет собрать топовую команду.
Эта роль подойдет рекрутеру, которому интересно раб…
📢А давайте сделаем пульс-опрос, поймем с вами на цифрах, что с HR рынком. Соберу несколько коротких анонимных опросов — потом сведу результаты в один вывод для канала.
В каком направлении вы работаете сейчас?
HR22%
Рекрутер48%
Руководитель HR (от тимлида до руководителя департамента)10%
Руководитель рекрутмента (от тимлида до руководителя департамента)10%
Я не из HR11%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Мы понимаем, что здесь в основном наши коллеги, но всё же около 15% участников чата — IT-специалисты. Возможно, этот месседж будет полезен именно вам или долетит через вас до того, кому он сейчас особенно нужен.
У нас освободилось время сильных консультантов, и мы наконец запустили отдельный продукт — помощь с резюме и поиском работы.
Мы каждый день работаем с десятками нанимающих менеджеров — от HR до IT-директоро…
😁😆😁 напомнить самым классным нашим HR и рекрутерам, какие они замечательные, умные, сильные, а после кризиса на рынке станут еще сильнее и вообще нарасхват 💚
И что "Счастье можно найти даже в темные времена" (с) 😌
А также, что мы, несмотря на бури и штормы еще пока занимаемся:
— Подбором
— RPO (имплант-рекрутментом)
— Аналитикой рынка
— Обучением HR и рекрутеров
— Психологической поддержкой в режиме поныть 24/7 (ес…
Коллеги, есть классная вакансия для Executive Recruiter в сильную edtech-команду.
Важно: это не классический рекрутинг.
Нужен человек с глубокой экспертизой именно в executive search под маркетинг / контент / продвижение.
Если у вас нет опыта executive search (Head / C-level) и хорошего понимания рынка маркетинга / бренда / контента, эта роль вам не подойдет.
Теперь немного подробностей:
Здесь нет готовых профиле…
🔥10❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hirockits. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📢А давайте сделаем пульс-опрос, поймем с вами на цифрах, что с HR рынком. Соберу несколько коротких анонимных опросов — потом сведу результаты в один вывод для канала.
В каком направлении вы работаете сейчас?
HR22%
Рекрутер48%
Руководитель HR (от тимлида до руководителя департамента)10%
Руководитель рекрутмента (от тимлида до руководителя департамента)10%
Я не из HR11%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,228,563 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hi, Rockits! 👋🏻 Полезности для IT-рекрутеров” (@hirockits), 7,642 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hirockits.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
