Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hanbali fiqh

Channel

Hanbali fiqh

@hanbali_fiqh_1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,142subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001189351065
TypeChannel
Username@hanbali_fiqh_1
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hanbali_fiqh_1

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,1342,1532,143.59 August 2026 — 2,151 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,152 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,153 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,152 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,147 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,144 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,141 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,140 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,136 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,134 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,138 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,142 subscribers2,1429 August 202616 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 38 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,131–2,156 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 13:412,142+4
12 Sept 2026, 20:192,138+4
8 Sept 2026, 13:162,134-2
3 Sept 2026, 09:122,136-4
31 Aug 2026, 02:432,140-1
25 Aug 2026, 04:152,141-3
22 Aug 2026, 03:562,144-3
19 Aug 2026, 06:452,147-5
16 Aug 2026, 15:352,152-1
12 Aug 2026, 21:142,153+1
10 Aug 2026, 01:512,152+1
9 Aug 2026, 06:172,151first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2026, 12:27 UTC659 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://youtu.be/y-p1a8gDJkU?si=HoybuMs7Eq59z54o Class: Usool Al-Fiqh Material: Poem in Usool Al-Fiqh by Sh Amir Bahjat [Class on Usool Al-Fiqh taught by one of the Admins on this channel]

1 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC726 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheHanbaliInstitutePhoto

Fiqh Course: Akhṣar al-Mukhtaṣarāt Part 4: Kitāb al-Zakāh, al-Ḥajj & al-Jihād This course provides a clear and methodical introduction to Hanbali jurisprudence, making it ideal for students of knowledge and anyone seeking a strong grounding in fiqh. Alongside the primary text, references will be made to al-Muntahā, al-Iqnāʿ, al-Ghāyah, enabling students to appreciate the depth, structure, and legal reasoning of the …

29 Jun 2026, 10:37 UTC655 viewsread 9 August 2026

ترجمة نظم اجابة العجول الى اللغة الإنجليزية

3 Jun 2026, 23:20 UTC≈1,350 viewsread 9 August 2026

[Some rulings Related to Wearing a Ring] It is better to wear the ring on the left hand, and it is also recommended that it be worn on the little finger. It is disliked to wear the ring on the middle finger or the index finger, while wearing it on the remaining fingers is permissible. It is permissible to wear multiple rings, so long as it doesn’t oppose the U’rf (customs) #fiqhgem117

20 May 2026, 12:18 UTC≈1,730 viewsread 9 August 2026

[The ruling on kissing the hand of a scholar as a religious practice] 🔹Ibn Umar reported in a narration: “We came close to the Prophet ﷺ and kissed his hand.” Narrated by Abu Dawud (5223). 🔹Abu Dawud also narrated in Sunan (2/778) from Umm Aban bint Al-Wazi’ from her grandfather Zari’, who was part of the delegation of Abdul Qais. He said: “When we arrived in Madinah, we hurried down from our riding animals and ki…

19 May 2026, 02:05 UTC≈2,130 viewsread 9 August 2026

🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕 From the unique positions (mufradāt) of the Hanaabilah: the prohibition of taking hair or nails once the first ten days of Dhū al-Ḥijjah begin for one intending to offer a sacrifice (uḍḥiyah). 🔰If the first ten days of Dhū al-Ḥijjah commence and a person intends to offer an uḍḥiyah, is it permissible for him to take from his hair or nails? 📍The scholars differed concerning this issue into several opini…

13 May 2026, 05:58 UTC≈1,980 viewsread 9 August 2026

[Ruling on newly wedded couple having sexual intercourse after nikah and before they begin living together] 🔷Answer by Sh.Ahmad Al-Quaymi حفظه الله 🔷 “Here there is an issue/question: Is it permissible for a husband to have intercourse with his wife before he has formally taken her into his care/household, while she is still in her family’s home or elsewhere? I have some hesitation regarding this matter, because …

13 May 2026, 05:43 UTC≈1,600 viewsread 9 August 2026

[when is it obligatory for the family to hand over the bride to the husband] It is obligatory for the newly wedded bride to be received by her husband into his care/household if the following conditions are met: 1. The Nikah contract must be completed. 2. The husband requests her to live with him. 3. That she is a free woman (married slaves can only stay with their husbands during the night) 4. That the bride ha…

28 Apr 2026, 12:29 UTC≈1,520 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Does touching the opposite gender nullify one's wudoo?

  1. Yes7%
  2. No19%
  3. Yes, if done with sexual desire73%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Apr 2026, 14:28 UTC≈2,040 viewsread 9 August 2026

[Rulings that are done every other day and not daily] 1. Applying oil to the hair of the body 2. Praying Ṣalāt al-Ḍuḥā 3. Visiting a sick person Shaykh Amir Bahjat said that these are the only rulings he has come across in the madhhab of this nature. #Fiqhgem113

4 Apr 2026, 07:40 UTC≈3,370 viewsread 9 August 2026

[The rulings of the Hanabilah are either easier in comparison to the other schools or a middle ground or more difficult] As for the first category, it includes the fact that the madhhab of Ahmad holds that the urine and droppings of all animals whose meat is permissible to eat are pure—such as sheep, cattle, camels, horses, chickens, geese, and others. This is something that people are widely tested with, and were i…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hanbali_fiqh_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Apr 2026, 12:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz522 voters

Does touching the opposite gender nullify one's wudoo?

  1. Yes7%
  2. No19%
  3. Yes, if done with sexual desire73%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 3 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

﷽ Islamic Quotes ™
@IslamicQuotess · 27,367
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 12 September 2026
IELTS Prep by LeapScholar
@LeapScholar_IELTS_prep · 36,997
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hanbali fiqh” (@hanbali_fiqh_1), 2,142 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hanbali_fiqh_1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.