Channel
@GemsFromHanabilah
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,357subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001805565373 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GemsFromHanabilah |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GemsFromHanabilah |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 1,357 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:57 | 1,358 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:55 | 1,357 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 1,358 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:45 | 1,357 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:30 | 1,357 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
288 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 240 | 83.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 32 | 11.1% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 3.82% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.694% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.347% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.347% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.347% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 288 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2025 to 24 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
In the Hanbali Madhab, it is encouraged to spend on one's family on the day of 'Ashura. Ibn Mansur asked (Al-Imam) Ahmad about it, he said: "Yes, it was narrated by Sufyan ibn 'Uyaynah, from Ja'far, from Ibrahim ibn Muhammad ibn al-Muntashir, who was among the best of people in his time, that it reached him: "Whoever generously spends on his family on the day of Ashura, Allah will be generous to him for the rest o…
❤6😍1
🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕 From the unique positions (mufradāt) of the Hanaabilah: the prohibition of taking hair or nails once the first ten days of Dhū al-Ḥijjah begin for one intending to offer a sacrifice (uḍḥiyah). 🔰If the first ten days of Dhū al-Ḥijjah commence and a person intends to offer an uḍḥiyah, is it permissible for him to take from his hair or nails? 📍The scholars differed concerning this issue into several opini…
❤2❤🔥1
How to keep your hands in Du'a -> Spreading one's hands -> Hands joined together -> Hands are raised to level of the chest [Al-Iqna' and its Sharh]
قال في نظم المفردات: " والعيدُ والجُمعةُ إِن قد جُمِعا فتسقُطُ الجُمعةُ نَصًّا سُمِعا عمَّنْ أتَى بالعيدِ لا يُستثنى سِوى الإمامِ في أصحِّ المَعنى " قال الإمام البهوتي في شرحه: " يعني إذا وافق العيد يوم الجمعة سقطت عمن حضره مع الإمام، وممن قال بالسقوط الشعبي والنخعي والأوزاعي، وقد قيل أنه مذهب عمر وعثمان وعلي وابن عمر وابن عباس وابن الزبير، ولنا عن أبي هريرة قال ﷺ (اجتمع في يومكم هذا عيدان فمن شاء أجزاه عن الجمعة ) …
❤2
‘Ata’ (رحمه الله), from the Tābi’īn, used to give Zakāt al-Fitr on behalf of his deceased parents. Imām Ahmad endorsed this. [مسائل أبي داود، الإقناع]
❤2
✨ سجل الآن في مدارسة التعليق المقنع على زاد المستقنع ✍🏻 الدراسة مجانية عبر الواتساب والتفاصيل في الإعلان المرفق وللتسجيل أرسل 1 للرجال || أرسلي 2 للنساء: https://wa.me/message/252D2CQ65EN7B1?src=qr 🌹 ساهم بالنشر كتب الله أجرك
Imām Al-Buhūti رحمه الله said: (و) يسن (صوم المحرم وهو أفضل الصيام بعد صيام شهر رمضان)؛ لقوله صلى الله عليه وسلم: أفضل الصلاة بعد المكتوبة جوف الليل, وأفضل الصيام بعد رمضان شهر الله المحرم رواه مسلم وغيره من حديث أبي هريرة “It is recommended (Mustahabb) to fast the entirety of Al-Muharram, and it is the best fasting after the fasting of the month of Ramadan,” Because the Prophet ﷺ said: “The best prayer after the…
❤16❤🔥3
Ibn Hāni’ رحمه الله said: "تعشيت مرة أنا وأبو عبد الله (يعني الإمام أحمد بن حنبل) وقرابة له، فجعلنا نتكلم، وهو يأكل، وجعل يمسح عند كل لقمة يده بالمناديل، وربما مسحها بالمنديل عند كل لقمة، وجعل يقول عند كل لقمة: الحمد لله، وبسم الله. ثم قال لي: أكل وحمد، خير من أكل وصمت" . Once, I was having dinner with Abu Abdillah (Imam Ahmed) and one of his relatives, so we started talking while he was eating and he would wipe hi…
❤27❤🔥4
Ruling if the day of Eid coincides with the day of Jumu’ah - If the day of Eid coincides with the day of Jumu’ah, it's permissible to suffice with just the Eid Salah. - It is recommended to attend both the Eid prayer and the Jumu’ah Salah. - Whoever misses the Eid Salah and only catches the Eid Khutbah must attend the Jumuah Salah. - The Dhuhr Salah in Jama’ah (congregation) is still obligatory. If there is no Ja…
❤12👍1
The 10 days of Dhul Hijjah - Shaykh Abdus Salam Ash-Shuwa’yr حفظه الله ورعاه
❤🔥6❤3💯1
The Permissibility of Gifting the Reward of Righteous Deeds to Living and Deceased Muslims Shaykh Al-Buhuti (رحمه الله) said: "Every pious deed performed by a Muslim, if he dedicates its reward (all of it or some of it, such as half, a third, or a quarter) to another Muslim, whether living or deceased, it is permissible and the benefits reach the one it is intended for. This is because the reward reaches him, even …
❤14🤔2👍1
Grey Hair in the Hanbali Madhab It is Makruh (disliked) to pluck white or grey hair in the Hanbali Madhab, this applies to both the face and the head. Some of the Hanabilah even state that it could be Haram, as it is Haram to pluck facial hair. This is because it is narrated in a Hadith that: “The white hair is the light of a Muslim.” However, Ibn Aqeel رحمه الله, in his book Fusūl Fil-Adab Wa Makārim Al-Akhlāq,…
❤21
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @GemsFromHanabilah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gems From Hanabilah 📚” (@GemsFromHanabilah), 1,357 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GemsFromHanabilah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.