Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

halusinogen

@haluccys

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

159subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001607344821
TypeChannel
Username@haluccys
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/haluccys

Growth

159160159.57 August 2026 — 160 subscribers8 August 2026 — 160 subscribers13 August 2026 — 159 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 159–160 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:44159-1
8 Aug 2026, 17:15160no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:07160first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 16 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1843.9%
🔥1024.4%
❤‍🔥717.1%
🎉37.32%
🍓12.44%
🏆12.44%
🥰12.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @haluccys. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 May 2026 to 4 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC95 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

papa.. ☹️☹️ i should be the one thanking u. thank u for always being there for me, for being so patient with me, and for making me feel so loved every single day. im really grateful that i got to meet u too. thank u for choosing me to be ur little princess. that's one of my favorite things to hear. i hope ull always be happy and surrounded by people who love u just as much as u deserve. and no matter what happens,

4🏆1🥰1

4 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC84 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ENGRPBasePhoto

#ENGRPconfession To my dearest daughter, haluccy @pastis. Maybe Papa has never really said this to you before, but I'm truly grateful that our paths crossed here. Thank you for staying by my side through everything and for choosing to stay with me all this time. Thank you for being so patient with me, for always making my days brighter, and most of all, thank you for being Papa's little princess. I hope you always fi

21 May 2026, 23:00 UTC566 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ⋆ ☁︎ tiny scribes colorful chalk in a sketchbook, holding decoration full of memories recorded on pages filled with traces. the softness of the color spectrum holds happiness and true affection. In celebration of 𝗛𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗰𝗰𝘆 𝗕𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝗿𝗼𝘀𝗲, portraying 𝙊𝙡𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙖 𝙋𝙝𝙞𝙡𝙡𝙞𝙥𝙨, twenty-fourth birthday, with the sweetest of smiles, leaving behind a warm trail of hugs. Colourful c

🔥53🎉3

21 May 2026, 23:00 UTC171 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ not forcing but the tiny chalk kids in my brain said your profile would look cooler with a #PaintMeTwentyfour twibbon behehe :) ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

2🔥1

21 May 2026, 14:42 UTC84 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SPLASHNEWSRPPhoto

#HotSplash Masta spending a beautiful day with his beloved children, Haluccy, Miles, and Tamara, enjoying a warm dinner together at a cozy restaurant filled with laughter and happy conversations. Between the good food, little jokes, and the way they enjoyed each other’s company, it was one of those simple moments that quietly became a memory worth keeping forever.

21 May 2026, 13:35 UTC56 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SPLASHNEWSRPPhoto

#HotSplash Gorgia, Raymond, Artvies, Trisno, Rangga, Yena, Tamara, Rufus, Owen, Masta, Dane, Tunjung, Naomi, Desmond, Jett, Haluccy, Hugo, Gigie, and Jeremiah gathering around one table for a dinner that looked straight out of a movie scene. Between overflowing laughter, endless conversations, clinking glasses, and the city lights surrounding them, the night slowly turned into something far more memorable than just a

20 May 2026, 15:00 UTC234 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ papa, abang, liat deh ade udah besar... ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

9🍓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @haluccys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 650,914 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“halusinogen” (@haluccys), 159 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/haluccys.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.