Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
SPLASH NEWS
@SPLASHNEWSRP
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,628subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001429288034 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SPLASHNEWSRP |
| Description | The latest Roleplayer celebrity news, daily! Roleplayer photography Agency, All credits reserved to The Real artists. @CommunionWRP @WRPbannedmuse Affiliated to: @SpIashEnt, @Westernroleplayers, @WestRPMenfess, @WrpNsfw & @WetlandByWrp. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SPLASHNEWSRP |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 4,628 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 4,630 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 4,632 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 21.0%
- avg views ÷ 4,628 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 973
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.50%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (7 June 2026 – 19 July 2026) |
| Views total | 3,891 |
| Reactions total | 45 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈15,300
- Videos
- ≈1,130
- Links
- ≈8,520
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
397 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 148 | 37.3% | |
| 🔥 | 63 | 15.9% | |
| 🏆 | 35 | 8.82% | |
| 🐳 | 28 | 7.05% | |
| 💯 | 26 | 6.55% | |
| 🎉 | 24 | 6.05% | |
| 💘 | 14 | 3.53% | |
| ⚡ | 11 | 2.77% | |
| 🆒 | 11 | 2.77% | |
| 🍾 | 8 | 2.02% | |
| 💋 | 8 | 2.02% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 2.02% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 1.26% | |
| 🦄 | 4 | 1.01% | |
| 💅 | 3 | 0.756% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.252% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 397reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 62
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 4
- of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
- Most on one post
- 50
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SPLASHNEWSRP. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 June 2026 to 19 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
#Splash Happiest birthday to Romee Strijd! Wishing you a day filled with love, happiness, and all the beautiful moments you deserve. Your effortless grace, timeless beauty, and radiant spirit continue to inspire people around the world. Whether on the runway, in front of the camera, or embracing life's sweetest moments, you carry yourself with elegance, confidence, and authenticity that make you truly unforgettable. …
❤6🐳4💯3🏆2🔥1
Sticker, posted without a caption
The beauty of life is truly a cosmic dance that only gets more breathtaking with each revolution around the sun, Vivianne Sinclair. As you celebrate another trip around the solar system, may your wishes take flight and spread joy to every facet of your world. Another year of opportunities for growth, love, and adventure has unfolded, bringing with it a multitude of experiences to embrace and cherish. May your path al…
🎉11❤8🔥6🐳2🏆1💯1
Sticker, posted without a caption
OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT FROM SPLASH NEWS We formally inform all stakeholders that SPLASH NEWS and SPLASH ENTERTAINMENT will commence a temporary hiatus, effective immediately, until further notice. This decision has been reached following careful consideration and strategic deliberations within our team. We believe that this period of suspension will facilitate reflection, reorganization, and preparation for the next …
❤76🏆13🐳6⚡4🍾4
Sticker, posted without a caption
#HotSplash Candice and Phoenix spotted turning another ordinary night into something unforgettable. Between the city lights, the endless roses, and the way their eyes always seem to find each other, they looked like a scene borrowed from a timeless love story.
🔥11🏆6❤4🎉4🍾2💋2💘2🦄2
#HotSplash Sunday morning at the Wailing Wall in Solo. Cale, Ammeline, and Maëlys came to pray for their future as company directors back home. The future CEOs spent the day chasing big dreams, enjoying good company, and making memories along the way. They hope this won't be their last adventure, so anyone looking for a fun trip, good laughs, and a little luck for their future is more than welcome to join them on the…
🔥7❤4💯3🏆1🐳1🥰1😍1😎1
#HotSplash An afternoon in the kitchen turned into a sweet day for Marie and Rowena as the two spent time baking and decorating a cake together. While Rowena handled most of the work, Marie stayed close by as her loyal emotional support, filling the process with laughter and good company. Not even the miles between Scotland and Los Angeles could keep Marie and Rowena apart. The final decoration may not have been perf…
❤4🎉2💯2🏆1🐳1
#HotSplash A few days in Los Angeles blurred past like a scene from a film—sunlit hills, endless streets, and the iconic Hollywood sign watching from a distance. Between fittings, city lights, and stolen moments, Ruth Kearney and Theo James continue to prove that the best memories are often the simplest ones. They found themselves exactly where they had always been: side by side.
❤3⚡2🍾2💅2💘2🔥2🎉1🏆1
#HotSplash Robert and Madeline came for the food and stayed for the conversation, forks clinking and laughter spilling between courses. Every dish brought a surprise — bold, comforting, and exactly what the week needed. Already planning a comeback for seconds.
❤10🐳3🔥3💘2🏆1💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @SPLASHNEWSRP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 32,766 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@CommunionWRP · 2762 postshalusinogen
@haluccys · 1592 postsexplode.
@hogswart · 232 posts𝐋𝐚 𝐆𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐞 𝐝’𝐎𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐚 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐬
@OIiviaPhillips · 42 postsLavishly Maiden, Fatherwyne.
@Authentyc · 2001 postCLOSED HORIZONS.
@ClosedHorizons · 211 post𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞
@cruelhooman · 1011 post𝑻𝒊𝒎𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝑬𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆: 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑹𝒂𝒅𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒕 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒗𝒚 𝑩𝒂𝒓𝒍𝒂
@FlavyBaarlaa · 61 post𝐆𝐈𝐑𝐋 𝐈𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐁𝐔𝐁𝐁𝐋𝐄
@goldierosies · 2171 post𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑮𝒐𝒅𝒔𝒎𝒂𝒏 𝑺𝒑𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒅
@lilisgodsman · 3091 post𝒲ritten by ꓼ 𝒩
@mugglebvrn · 221 postSOUTHSIDE.
@OFCSOUTHSIDE · 161 post𝐒𝐏𝐈𝐂𝐘 𝐀𝐍𝐆𝐄𝐋𝐒
@spicyangels · 201 postStout Abode
@stoutabode · 731 postThe Rault’s Manor Abode.
@TheRault · 8671 post𝑳𝒖𝒄𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒂 𝑬𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒓
@waslucester · 1491 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@SPLASHNEWSRP named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SPLASH NEWS” (@SPLASHNEWSRP), 4,628 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SPLASHNEWSRP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.