Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
ENGLISH ROLEPLAYER.
@ENGRPBase
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
20,098subscribers
+82 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001178735474 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ENGRPBase |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ENGRPBase |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 20,098 | +17 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 20,081 | +13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 20,068 | +16 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 20,052 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 20,056 | +15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 20,041 | +22 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 20,019 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 20,016 | first reading |
Engagement
146 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.41%
- avg views ÷ 20,098 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 284
- 143 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.70%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 146
- of 146 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 143 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 146 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 40,658 |
| Reactions total | 170 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
170 reactions across 22 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 59 | 34.7% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 18.8% | |
| 🍾 | 16 | 9.41% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 7.65% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 5.88% | |
| 💋 | 8 | 4.71% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 4.71% | |
| 🍓 | 7 | 4.12% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 3.53% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 2.94% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.588% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 0.588% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.588% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.588% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 146 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 170reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 146 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
That's the last menfess from us, sadly we have to close now. Well we'll see you guys later, don't miss me okay. Oh yeah, check out @engrants for random ranting by the admins of engrp. You wanna join the fun? Just join @ENGRPLoungee what are you waiting for come onnnnn!? Hurry up before you miss out the fun! Oh don't forget our amazing partner hello? @EnglishMuses @engnsfworld @Westhoodfess don't miss out, come check…
#seek our chat has been collecting dust lately 😭 so my friend and i looking for 1-3 people who are willing to make a group chat with us. any gender & portrayer welcome, (anton rpers get a free pass) we can yap about whatever happens to cross our minds. no pressure, no rushing, just come in, chill, and vibe with us!
#Howdy everyone! This is Lee Hyein (2008) who is currently on temporary swap as Kang Haerin (2006) and she’s on a mission to find her Friends with Affection! A little about me; I am very talkative and love talking about stuff that fascinates me, my range of topics are very wide. I also like to send fpap to my partner and very much interested in deep and thought provoking conversations. I’m only up for BxG and please …
#HOWDY. Here's with Margaret Qualley (94) currently looking for someone with affection, up for any gender as submissive :]. I'm a yapper, to be honest. By the way, the Walking Dead and Hannibal enjoyer get a free pass and laaast I will tell you more about myself later, see ya. <3
#Howdy Tell me your current interest to be my friend!
#Howdy this is a dupe of Han So Hee (1993), and i’m currently looking for a FWA (friends with affection), only up for bxg and i lean more on the soft submissive side. i’m the type who can match your energy, whether it’s random fun chats at 2am, brain-rotting over silly things, or actually having proper, meaningful discussions about life, feelings, or anything in between. i like conversations that flow naturally, no…
#Howdy Does any of this series, anime, movie, musical nerd favorites catch your attention? Leave a trace for this William Jakrapatr and let's be nerd together.
#Howdy. Befriend with this Stella? Linemates & bandmates get free pass! <3
Don't judge a cover by its book or whatever so anyway, #howdy, pal. Canon Leon Kennedy roleplayer with his slightly unhinged interests here are now looking for his people with similar taste as him—or not, no biggie. If there's any of my interest up here caught your attention, I'd suggest you to LAT below.
Hi #howdy, this Evan duplicate speaking (01L). i’m looking for new faces and new buddy to hang out with. i’m down for sharing my affections too. leave your best trace and let’s connected.
#howdy be friend with me, anyone?
Showing the 12 most recent of 146 posts we hold for @ENGRPBase. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 38,801 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@bIeedingwords · 2451 post𝘓𝘕: 𝘙𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘥. 🇬🇧
@Fournation · 7771 post𝐆𝐈𝐑𝐋 𝐈𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐁𝐔𝐁𝐁𝐋𝐄
@goldierosies · 2171 posthalusinogen
@haluccys · 1591 post#HoeMantics
@HoeMantics · 321 postJASPERVOID: HOLD SFS.
@JASPERVOID · 1,4141 post𝐈𝐆𝐍𝐀𝐋𝐔𝐒𝐀
@JosetteMiller · 771 post(DISBAND) The Threnode Stentorian, Metjerl.
@Metjerl · 1911 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ENGLISH ROLEPLAYER.” (@ENGRPBase), 20,098 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ENGRPBase.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.