Channel
@h2podcast
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
645subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001965803408 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @h2podcast |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/h2podcast |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 645 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 643 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 643 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 April 2026 – 18 July 2026) |
| Views total | 196 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
91 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 30.8% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 28.6% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 23.1% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 8.79% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 4.40% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.20% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg: So entkommen wir dem globalen Machtapparat (Klick auf Titel führt zum Video 🎦) Wie können wir einer zunehmend zentralisierten und undurchsichtigen Welt etwas entgegensetzen? Im zweiten Teil seines Referats bei Aletheia richtet Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg den Blick auf mögliche Lösungen. Im Mittelpunkt steht das Prinzip der Subsidiarität: Entscheidungen sollen dort getroffen werden, wo ihre Folgen unmit…
❤3👍2
WHO empfiehlt Insektizide im Flugzeug – Was Passagiere nicht wissen (Klick auf Titel führt zum Video 🎦) Auf ausgewählten internationalen Flugverbindungen werden Passagiere während des Flugs oder kurz vor der Landung mit Insektiziden in Kontakt gebracht – ohne vorherige Information bei der Buchung. In dieser Sendung zeigen wir, • weshalb Flugzeuge überhaupt desinsektiert werden, • welche Rolle die WHO und nationale …
❤3🔥3👍2
Schubert, Sönnichsen & Co.: Vier Ärzte stellen die Medizin auf den Kopf Hier schauen & mitreden: https://youtu.be/Q-BcU3iQnLQ Was bedeutet Heilung wirklich? Reicht es aus, Krankheiten zu behandeln – oder braucht Medizin ein völlig neues Menschenbild? Im aktuellen Gesundheits-Podium des PanaCeHa-Kongresses diskutieren Dr. Andreas Heisler, Prof. Christian Schubert, Dr. Andreas Sönnichsen und Dr. Petra Wiechel über E…
❤4👍1🔥1
Impfpflicht, WHO & Milliardenverträge: Was wird verschwiegen? Welche politischen Konsequenzen müssen aus der Corona-Zeit gezogen werden? Im Anschluss an das Referat von Prof. Konstantin Beck diskutieren Andrea Staubli, Philipp Kruse, Nicole Burger und Konstantin Beck über Impfstoffverträge, Haftungsfragen, Gesundheitsgesetze, WHO-Kompetenzen, kantonale Impfobligatorien und die politische Aufarbeitung. Moderiert wir…
🔥2❤1👍1
Geburteneinbruch: Professor Beck präsentiert neue Daten Prof. Konstantin Beck präsentiert die Ergebnisse seiner aktuellen Recherchen zur Entwicklung der Geburtenzahlen in der Schweiz und Europa. Im Mittelpunkt stehen: 👉 Geburtenrückgänge seit 2022 👉 Daten aus Tschechien mit über 1,3 Millionen Frauen 👉 Ergebnisse aus Tierversuchen 👉 Kommunikation durch Medien und Behörden 👉 Auswirkungen auf die Bevölkerungsentwicklu…
❤3👍1
📡 Können elektromagnetische Felder biologische Prozesse beeinflussen? Prof. Dr. Dr. habil. Klaus Buchner war Professor an der Technischen Universität München, arbeitete in der Elementarteilchenphysik und war Mitglied des Europäischen Parlaments. In seinem Vortrag beleuchtet er mögliche Zusammenhänge zwischen Funkstrahlung, oxidativem Stress, DNA-Schäden, Krebsrisiken und Missbildungen bei Tieren. Dabei diskutiert e…
👍2
24'000 Kinder fehlen – Prof. Beck warnt vor dem demografischen Kollaps Im Gespräch mit Regina Castelberg analysiert Prof. Dr. Konstantin Beck die Entwicklung der Geburtenraten in der Schweiz, Deutschland und Österreich. Ausgangspunkt sind zahlreiche Zuschauerkommentare und Fragen, die nach früheren HOCH2-Beiträgen eingegangen sind. Warum sinken die Geburtenzahlen? Handelt es sich um einen langfristigen Trend oder g…
❤2🔥2
5G: «Geringe Eindringtiefe ist nicht gut – sondern schlecht» 📡 Mobilfunk ist aus dem modernen Alltag kaum mehr wegzudenken. Doch wie funktionieren 5G & Co. eigentlich? Welche Rolle spielen Frequenz, Bandbreite und Strahlungsleistung? Und welche Fragen stellen sich im Zusammenhang mit möglichen biologischen Auswirkungen? Prof. Dr. Werner Bergholz war Professor für Electrical Engineering an der Jacobs University Brem…
🔥2
Der Wohlfahrtsstaat scheitert – und niemand will es sehen | Olivier Kessler Olivier Kessler vom Liberalen Institut stellt eine provokante Frage: 👉Ist der Wohlfahrtsstaat tatsächlich die Lösung gesellschaftlicher Probleme – oder selbst Teil des Problems geworden? In seinem Vortrag analysiert Kessler die Entwicklung von Gesundheitswesen, Sozialstaat und Staatsfinanzen und präsentiert eine konsequent liberale Alternat…
👍2❤1👏1
RFK Jr. greift ein: Verfolgte Ärzte schlagen international Alarm Während für viele Menschen die Corona-Zeit längst abgeschlossen scheint, kämpfen zahlreiche kritische Ärzte und Wissenschaftler bis heute mit den Folgen ihrer damaligen Haltung. Im Gespräch mit Regina Castelberg sprechen Prof. Dr. Stefan Hockertz und Christian Oesch über Repressionen gegen Mediziner, wirtschaftliche Existenzvernichtung, juristische Ve…
❤4🔥4⚡3
Dr. Wodarg warnt: Gesundheit wird zum Instrument der Kontrolle Was geschieht, wenn Gesundheit zum politischen Machtinstrument wird? Der deutsche Arzt und ehemalige Bundestagsabgeordnete Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg analysiert in diesem ausführlichen Referat die Entwicklung internationaler Machtstrukturen rund um WHO, Medien, Pharmaindustrie und Politik. Er spricht über: – globale Monopole und institutionelle Korruption – D…
👍3🔥3👏2
Ideologie spaltet – und plötzlich wird jeder zum Feind Was unterscheidet Philosophie von Ideologie? Der Philosoph und Satiriker Andreas Thiel analysiert am PanaCeHa-Kongress grundlegende gesellschaftliche Mechanismen: – Individualismus vs. Kollektivismus – Angst und Solidarität – „Wir gegen die anderen“-Denken – und die Frage, warum Ideologien oft mit Druck und Ausgrenzung arbeiten Dabei verbindet Thiel Philosophi…
❤4👎2🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @h2podcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 25,266 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HOCH2.TV - Podcast” (@h2podcast), 645 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/h2podcast.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.