Channel
@gigatea
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,218subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002319515606 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gigatea |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gigatea |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 1,218 | +10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:10 | 1,208 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 1,209 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:06 | 1,209 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (9 June 2026 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,454 |
| Reactions total | 118 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
❗️100 ГРАММОВ ЧАЯ ЗА ОТЗЫВ❗️ Напоминаем, есть ещё очень много чая, скорее всего получат почти все, но стоит поторопиться! 5 минут времени = 100 граммов премиального чая, выгодно? Оставить отзыв: https://yandex.ru/profile/106865629982/ Форма для заявок на чай: https://forms.yandex.ru/u/6a64bd9595add5a66223755f
ПОГОДИТЕ, ЭТО РЕАЛЬНО❓ Для всех, наших учеников, прошедших до уровня «Легенда» скидка 30% на последующие три заказа! Бесплатное обучение, так ещё и с большой скидкой, стоит ли пропускать? Входишь через почту/тг -> Изучаешь чай -> Экономишь на премиальном чае -> PROFIT gigatea.ru/edu
❓ОБУЧАЕМ ЧАЮ❓ На сайте добавили раздел изучения бескрайнего чайного искусства! Будем постоянно обновлять! Также как приятный бонус выдаем сертификаты, стоит только войти через почту! Ждем на https://gigatea.ru/edu!
💭ЧАЙ ДАРОМ💭 У нас удалились комменты с отзывами в канале, поэтому просим помощи у вас написать в Яндексе! 20 отзывов получат от нас чай бесплатно! Просим прикладывать фотографии и/или писать развернуто. Ссылка на нас в Яндексе: https://yandex.ru/profile/106865629982/ Форма для заявок на чай
На фотографии был новый чай Мэндин Хуан Я, свежий ароматный зелёный чай с ощутимым бодрящим эффектом. Скоро на сайте, успейте купить! На каждой упаковке есть маркировка честного знака, с которой вы можете быть уверены, что это наш фирменный чай! Такой чай прошел долгий путь от плантаций через все лабораторные проверки и декларации прямо до ваших чайных посиделок! Взяли бы такую упаковку в Азбуке Вкуса? 🫖 — Жду в …
☀️ОБНОВЛЕНИЯ☀️ Сделали для вас новые упаковки, потратили на расфасовку несколько дней, суммарно более 2000 пачек отборного китайского чая. На 2 фотке новый чай. Кто угадает, какой это❓ Скоро на GIGATEA.ru.
ЧАЙ БЕЗ РЕГИСТРАЦИИ И СМС🗯 Как оформить заказ на GIGATEA.ru? Показываем за полминуты, насколько это быстро и просто Заказать | Подписаться | Совет | 🫖
❓ Почему чай с плантаций, а не с рынков Можно было пойти лёгким путём: закупиться оптом на китайском рынке в Гуанчжоу и пополнять каталог чаем среднего качества по оверпрайсу. Так делают многие и это лотерея. Мы не можем быть уверены в данных с какого куста лист, какого года, как хранился, а в чае это решает всё. Благодаря многолетнему опыту общения с фермерами мы пользуемся нашим особым правом возить напрямую с пл…
🗯 Совсем скоро жара снова победит дождливые будни, как продолжать получать удовольствие от вкуса и эффекта китайского чая? 🗯 😶🌫️ Рассказываем про метод холодной заварки! Подписка | Купить | Помощь 🫖
Почему в Китае чай называют красным, а в Европе — чёрным? Листай, чтобы узнать!! Подписка | Купить | Помощь 🫖
Почему ценители покупают пуэр блинами и убирают на полку? 🍵 Подписка | Купить | Помощь 🫖
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @gigatea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 53,841 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GIGATEA” (@gigatea), 1,218 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gigatea.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.