Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CryptoPlankton

@cryptomicrob

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,711subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001732397174
TypeChannel
Username@cryptomicrob
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptomicrob

Growth

1,7111,7221,716.57 August 2026 — 1,722 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,717 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,711 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,709–1,724 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 10:151,711-6
8 Aug 2026, 03:381,717-5
7 Aug 2026, 06:161,722first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 12 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 11s
Average length
1m 11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

221 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6429.0%
🔥5826.2%
😁2812.7%
🤯2410.9%
❤‍🔥156.79%
🤡114.98%
😱62.71%
🍌52.26%
🐳52.26%
😈41.81%
😭10.452%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2025 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
741
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 17 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
618
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptomicrob. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 June 2025 to 5 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 May 2026, 11:14 UTC391 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Там от просто эксченжа запустился маркетплейс техники Можно удобно за крипту взять В профиле есть еще и пункт выкупа техники. Я так понимаю, что из-за рубежа можно будет затариваться в будущем по типу сдек шоппинга Чекайте — клик

🔥2

Signed Roman BetaKill Capital

29 Apr 2026, 14:36 UTC572 views7 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Щас закупимся на хаях, на лаунче сандбокса вырастем еще сильнее и всех ждет успешный успех» Срочно рефку на всевозможные сервисы и колл на закуп, чтоб закрыться об подписоту

😁6😭1

Signed Roman BetaKill Capital

27 Apr 2026, 13:11 UTC475 views6 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Дуров вернул стену ? Да пох как-то Чтоооо, рефка ? Газ СНГ инфлы уже настолько обнищали, что мы вернулись во времена бесконечных тг аппок и тапалок. Ну точно бычка, скоро альтсещон

😁4👍2

Signed Roman BetaKill Capital

13 Apr 2026, 19:35 UTC692 views9 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

А че ни один вайбкуколдер свои дашборды говняные не выкатил еще, не пойму ? Уже месяц прошел Они не осилили доделать до рабочего состояния ? Или поняли, что делают говно ? Или после перевода опенкло на апишку вместо безлимитной подписки с клод кода деньги кончились ? Музыка остановилась ?

❤‍🔥3😁3👍2🐳1

Signed Roman BetaKill Capital

12 Apr 2026, 13:47 UTC601 views14 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Христос Воскресе ! Чет столько дебилов развелось в пространстве с популяризацией вайбкодинга, что даже захотелось начать вести паблик лишь бы поливать поносом их и бифиться Потихоньку расскажу, чем занимался А вы че делаете ? Уже успели сбилдить свой «супер востребованный» арбитраж дешборд и впн сервис ? 😁😁

👍8😁5❤‍🔥1

Signed Roman BetaKill Capital

1 Mar 2026, 20:28 UTC864 views11 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

🧐 Сколько ты реально заработал на подарках? Или потерял? Друзья, мы рады анонсировать, что наш бесплатный бот официально запущен! 🚨🚨🚨 @giftportfolio_bot 🚨🚨🚨 🚨🚨🚨 @giftportfolio_bot 🚨🚨🚨 🚨🚨🚨 @giftportfolio_bot 🚨🚨🚨 Что умеет: ↗️ Портфель с текущими ценами и P&L по каждому гифту 💬 Импорт ордеров прямо из Portals — пересылаешь сообщение и готово ✍️ Фильтр по вариантам — трекай конкретный фон или модель 💰 Добавление

🤡6😁5

Signed Roman BetaKill Capital

30 Dec 2025, 19:07 UTC961 views12 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Lighter, или же мой последний ретродроп Еще в сентябре я писал, насколько смарт крутить лайтер, насчитывал х76 к затратам на тот момент В ноябре-декабре случился бум на лайтер, челы сжигали бабки ради копеек, а потом еще и оказались побриты Тем не менее, если бы вы крутили проект с поста выше — вы бы, как и я, получили около 30 иксов на затраты Лично моя статистика: Каждый поинт обошелся мне в ~2$, по итоговому п

🔥6🍌3👍3

Signed Roman BetaKill Capital

28 Dec 2025, 19:25 UTC612 views12 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @freakytradyPhoto

Итоги декабря Спойлер: 675$ —> ~7500$ Этот месяц был очень продуктивным. Честно, по ощущениям в ноябре было больше актива, а оказалось, что декабрь намного профитнее Мой депозит на основном акке мекса вырос с 675$ в прошлом месяце до почти 4000$ ! На твинках около 200-300$ профита тоже, но их всего несколько штук Со следующего месяца в таком формате скорее всего не выйдет уже показать пнл, может и отлетит по РК😁

🐳4👍4🔥4

Signed Roman BetaKill Capital

6 Dec 2025, 13:29 UTC≈1,540 views18 reactions14 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дорогой, где ты был ? Работал Странно, но постов в паблике не было. Дура, в другом ищи ! Серьезно, крипта в говне, необходимо было работать либо усиленно, либо в других направлениях: Я принял волевое решение изучить для себя новые сферы, тем не менее связанные с криптой 1. Предикшн маркеты: Kalshi + Polymarket Все снг помешалось на амбассадорке полимаркета, решил на этом фоне прокачать свой твиттер. Делаю спред бот

🔥8👍4😈4😁2

Signed Roman BetaKill Capital

12 Sept 2025, 14:38 UTC≈1,910 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Hyperliquid 2.0, или почему Lighter уже конкурирует Lighter — инвайт-бета, закончится в конце сентября — начале октября 1️⃣ Сравнение Lighter x Hyperliquid(до TGE, срез на 12.09): • OI Hyperliquid 12/09/24 – ~$740M • OI Lighter 12/09/25 – ~$830M • TVL Hyperliquid 12/09/24 – ~$564M к началу октября —> $1B в ноябре • TVL Lighter 12/09/25 – ~$409M — source • USERS Hyperliquid 12/09/24 – 173k уникальных юзеров • USER

👍4❤‍🔥3🔥3

Signed Roman BetaKill Capital

23 Aug 2025, 16:57 UTC≈1,650 views13 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как я зарабатываю на трейдинге + Промокоды Upscale Вчера шортанул эфир, после профита шортанул SOL, но выбило по стопу 😁 Сейчас аккуратно шорчу TON Недавно услышал тезис: "Лонг битка + шорт говна". Помимо битка, сильный актив — HYPE. Хайперликвид стабильно генерирует большой доход. Думаю, HYPE однажды сравняется по цене с Соланой Причина успеха "шорта говна" — переизбыток монет, из-за чего нет альтсезона, как в 2

🔥5👍4❤‍🔥2🤡1🤯1

Signed Roman BetaKill Capital

21 Aug 2025, 17:41 UTC≈1,370 views18 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Промокод на 1000$ депозит Торгуете на Upscale ? Закинуть вам промики на 1000$ рабочий депозит сразу ? Все еще идет акция с раздачей депов за торговлю на демо-счете, параллельно вы можете открыть и платные счета Мне дали 10 промокодов на открытие счета по 1000$ Вы уже успели проверить свои силы и стратегии на демо-счетах и готовы выйти в работу ? Накидайте актива на пост — в следующем выложу промокоды Вот вам 3 п

🤯8🤡4🍌2👍2🔥2

Signed Roman BetaKill Capital

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @cryptomicrob. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,076,992 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CryptoPlankton” (@cryptomicrob), 1,711 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptomicrob.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.