3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 914–922 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 15:36
915
-6
7 Aug 2026, 01:46
921
no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:34
921
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.74%
avg views ÷ 915 subscribers
Avg views / post
70.9
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
20 (20 May 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
496
Reactions total
32
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
124 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5424912684078348533
36
29.0%
custom 5463256910851546817
32
25.8%
custom 5427107837568360763
23
18.5%
custom 5458471711693362291
14
11.3%
🐳
8
6.45%
custom 5388871027927294873
7
5.65%
custom 5363795999535930885
4
3.23%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GoldCapital_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Путин подписал закон о легализации криптовалюты в России🥳
С 1 сентября 2026 года цифровые валюты официально признаются имуществом
Регулировать и надзирать за рынком будет Центробанк
Что разрешено:
✔️Легально инвестировать в криптовалюты на российских биржах
✔️ Покупать/продавать через лицензированных брокеров, управляющие компании и криптообменники
✔️Майнинг для юрлиц и ИП из спецреестра (с запретом для неко…
Дуров четко подметил отношение к терроризму
💣 Россия признала меня "террористом" за отказ выполнять ее требования о массовой слежке и цензуре в Telegram.
Согласно российскому законодательству, мне запрещено "распространять информацию в интернете" 😌
Российские чиновники, очевидно, в замешательстве относительно того, кто может запретить кому пользоваться интернетом 😉
На сайте Enki.top постоянно ведутся обновления, ну а как иначе, ведь мы делаем лучшую платформу в мире! В разделе социальный рейтинг появилась информация о том, что получают владельцы рейтинга! Быстрее изучи этот раздел что бы не упустить новую тему!
Обновления WoMElite.pro
1) обновление отображения реферальной структуры, удобные фильтры по различным параметрам, рекомендую к изучению
2) обновление отображения дохода и ожидаемой прибыли, все размещено в личном кабинете
3) обновление авторизации через Ton connect, теперь все работает и из иконок
Сейчас ведем глобальную работу над Push уведомлениями , главной сайта и смарт контрактом.
Скоро вас ждут новые функци…
@monk пообещал новый крипто кошелек для всех!
🌍 Этим летом состоится масштабное внедрение криптокошелька без хранения ключей, которое станет самым большим в истории человечества.
⚡️ Мгновенные криптотранзакции без комиссий для более чем миллиарда пользователей вот-вот станут реальностью.
💎 Мы представляем собственный криптокошелек Gram, который будет доступен в каждом приложении Telegram! 🏳️
С нетерпением ждем пре…
❗️В России легализовали крипту: Госдума приняла закон, благодаря которому государство хочет контролировать все цифровые кошельки
• Криптовалюта признаётся имуществом и получает судебную защиту
• Регулировать рынок будет Центробанк — он создаст реестры легальных криптообменников и цифровых депозитариев
• Покупать криптовалюту в России можно будет через регулируемые биржи, брокеров и управляющих
• Неквалифицированн…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GoldCapital_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gold Capital” (@GoldCapital_official), 915 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GoldCapital_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
