Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 6 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 30 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 7, the earliest publisher we hold is @ghanonkar2 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 6 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
37 measurements spanning 52 days, net -3,911. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59,711–66,203 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 21:37
61,058
+390
19 Sept 2026, 17:01
60,668
-807
17 Sept 2026, 04:37
61,475
+619
15 Sept 2026, 06:57
60,856
+396
13 Sept 2026, 19:16
60,460
-1,452
12 Sept 2026, 02:15
61,912
-14
9 Sept 2026, 18:57
61,926
-148
6 Sept 2026, 13:35
62,074
+665
4 Sept 2026, 00:35
61,409
-849
2 Sept 2026, 18:04
62,258
+165
1 Sept 2026, 17:53
62,093
-754
31 Aug 2026, 15:34
62,847
-510
30 Aug 2026, 15:34
63,357
+618
29 Aug 2026, 15:33
62,739
-680
28 Aug 2026, 18:28
63,419
-886
27 Aug 2026, 17:06
64,305
+1,733
26 Aug 2026, 18:33
62,572
-423
25 Aug 2026, 20:54
62,995
-336
24 Aug 2026, 20:49
63,331
-526
23 Aug 2026, 08:54
63,857
first reading
Engagement
643 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 142 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.4%
avg views ÷ 61,058 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,600
406 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.331%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
406
of 643 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 259 of 406 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
643 (3 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
4,319,310
Reactions total
9,253
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 02:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈11,000
Videos
≈2,360
Links
≈39,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 01m
Average length
2m 14s
Measured directly from 81 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,405 reactions across 323 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,818
19.3%
❤
968
10.3%
👎
590
6.27%
🎉
484
5.15%
🖕
469
4.99%
💯
458
4.87%
🤩
430
4.57%
🔥
424
4.51%
❤🔥
413
4.39%
😡
403
4.28%
😢
401
4.26%
🥰
398
4.23%
😍
385
4.09%
🤬
383
4.07%
😈
336
3.57%
💔
313
3.33%
🥱
295
3.14%
👏
142
1.51%
👌
97
1.03%
👀
38
0.404%
14 further kinds
160
1.70%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 331 of the 643 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,414 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 643 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅ انتقاد کارگران شرکت فیلور از شرایط کاری/ اجازه تشکیل شورا نمیدهند!
🔸تعدادی از کارگران گروه تولیدی بهمن در تماس با خبرنگار ایلنا، از شرایط سخت کارخانه و اوضاع شغلی خود انتقاد کردند.
🔸شرکت فیلور زمانی در صنایع سرمایشی کشور خوشنام بود و فروش خوبی در بازار داشت اما حالا کارگرانش میگویند: در سالهای اخیر، تعداد نیروهای شاغل به شدت کاهش یافته؛ زمانی این شرکت صدها کارگر داشت.
🔸این کارگران از چندین موج تعدیل در این ک…
🔹از وعده به رئیسجمهور تا عمل؛ پلهای استان هرمزگان به مدار خدمت بازگشتند
🔹از گفتوگوی تلفنی رئیسجمهور با مدیرکل راهداری و حملونقل جادهای استان هرمزگان و تاکید بر بازسازی و آمادهسازی مسیرها پیش از آغاز بارندگیها، تا تلاش شبانهروزی مهندسان و راهداران...
🔹 ۵۵ روز، شبانهروز تلاش کردیم تا شریانهای حیاتی استان، پیش از موعدِ مقرر به بهرهبرداری برسد، امروز این عهد با حضور وزیر راه و شهرسازی، رئیس سازمان راهداری…
✅️بخشنامههای جنجالی تامین اجتماعی بدون نظرخواهی از تشکلهای کارگری
عباس شیری (بازرس کانون انجمن های صنفی کارگران ساختمانی کشور):
🔸️در خصوص بخشنامه ثبت آدرس محل کار به هیچوجه از نمایندگان کارگران ساختمانی نظرخواهی نشد؛ پیش از این قرار بر این بود که بازرسیها در درجهبندی ۳ هر سه ماه یکبار، در درجه ۲ سالانه و در درجه ۱ هر ۱۸ ماه یکبار انجام شود. اما بعد از آن، اصلاً با ما جلسهای تشکیل ندادند؛ چون میدانند ما در …
📣 تمدید شد!
قرعهکشی حسابهای قرضالحسنه پسانداز بانک گردشگری تا۱۵مهرماه تمدید شد
دارندگان حساب قرض الحسنه پس انداز با حفظ یا افزایش موجودی میتوانند در قرعهکشی شرکت کنند.
🚀 هر ۱۰۰ هزار تومان در هر روز = یک امتیاز
🎁 جوایز: ۲۰۰ جایزه ۲۵۰ میلیون تومانی، ۳۰۰ جایزه ۱۰۰ میلیون تومانی، ۴۰۰ جایزه ۵۰ میلیون تومانی، ۵۰۰ جایزه ۱۰ میلیون تومانی و بیش ۱۰ هزار جایزه نقدی دیگر.
📅 دوره محاسبه امتیازات: ۱ آبان ۱۴۰۴ تا ۱۵مهر ۱۴…
✅حداقل دستمزد در سال ۹۰ برابر ۷.۲ گرم طلا بود، امروز برابر با یک گرم
🔸در سال ۱۳۹۰ حداقل دستمزد معادل ۳۳۰ هزار و ۳۰۰ تومان بود. در آمن زمان این رقم معادل ۳۰۵ دلار یا ۷.۲ گرم طلای ۱۸ عیار بود. شورای عالی کار، حقوق پایه ماهانه را در حالی به ۱۶ میلیون و ۶۲۵ هزار تومان افزایش داد که در سال ۱۴۰۴ حقوق پایه ماهانه ۱۰ میلیون و ۳۹۰ هزار تومان بود.
🔸در روز ۲۶ اسفند ماه ۱۴۰۴، حداقل دستمزد مصوب برای ۱۴۰۵ معادل ۱۱۶ دلار بود. حال…
حماسهسازی از جنس امید؛ وقتی مهندسان و راهداران ایرانی، رویای دشمن را خاکستر کردند
دشمن به شریانهای حیاتی و زیرساختهای جادهای جنوب هجوم آورد تا با فرو ریختنِ پلها و زخمی کردن تن جادهها، نبض جابهجایی کالا در کشور از تپش بایستد.
پلها را نشانه گرفت در حالی که اراده ما را ندید، بتن و فولاد را ویران کرد، اما غیرت سازندگانِ این مرز و بوم را ندید.
امروز هرمزگان شاهرگ یک رستاخیز مهندسی است، چرا که در کمتر از ۵۵ رو…
✍️نماینده کارگران: فعلا خبری از نشست شورای عالی کار نیست
✅محسن باقری با اشاره به اینکه نشست بعدی این شورا هنوز برگزار نشده و در جلسه پیشین مقرر شده بود وزیر کار افزایشهای پیشنهادی را مجدد در دستور کار بگذارد، گفت: انتظار ما این است که موضوع ترمیم دستمزد، با توجه به مصوبه دستمزد و جهش هزینههای زندگی، هرچه سریعتر در شورای عالی کار رسیدگی شود.
🇮🇷 روابط عمومی کانال قانون کار ۲۴
https://t.me/ghanonkar24
🇮🇷 روابط عموم…
✅ دولت اراده ای برای محقق کردن رشد ۸ درصدی اقتصاد ندارد
بخشی دستجردی ( عضو کمیسیون اقتصادی) :
🔸دستیابی به رشد اقتصادی ۸ درصدی، یکی از اهداف مهم برنامههای توسعه کشور است که تحقق آن نیازمند مجموعهای از اقدامات هماهنگ در حوزههای تولید، سرمایهگذاری، تجارت، سیاستهای پولی و مالی و بهبود فضای کسبوکار است.
🔸رشد ۸ درصدی زمانی محقق خواهد شد که دولت با اجرای دقیق قوانین اقتصادی، حمایت از بخش خصوصی، تسهیل سرمایهگذاری د…
توزیع سهمیهای اقلام مصرفی خودرو
قطعات وارداتی شامل:
کیتکلاچ، لنتترمز،شمع،وایرشمع،تسمه تایم،تسمه دینام و...
مختص خودروهای داخلی
شروع طرح: شنبه ۴ مهرماه
ثبت سفارش با محدودیت کدملی
تحویل رایگان از ۱ تا ۳ روز کاری از طریق پست
💳امکان دریافت نقدی و اقساطی
🌐متقاضیان گرامی جهت کسب اطلاعات بیشتر و درخواست اقلام میتوانند به وبسایت ایرانکو مراجعه نمایند:
www.iranko.ir
.
✍ابلاغ 3 مقرره جدید در راستای ساماندهی نیروهای شرکتی
✅3 مقرره جدید، ثبت اطلاعات نیروهای شرکتی، شرکتهای پیمانکاری و ضوابط پرداخت حقوق را ساماندهی میکند.
🔹️ در راستای ساماندهی وضعیت نیروهای شرکتی، 3 مقرره جدید درباره ثبت اطلاعات نیروهای شرکتی و شرکتهای پیمانکاری، آغاز فرآیند اجرایی ساماندهی و همچنین نظام پرداخت این نیروها ابلاغ شده است.
🇮🇷 روابط عمومی کانال قانون کار ۲۴
https://t.me/ghanonkar24
🇮🇷 روابط عمومی کا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 643 posts we hold for @ghanonkar2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ghanonkar2 edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ghanonkar2 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@nigc_ir named in 5 posts, 23 August 2026 – 4 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
کارکنان ارکان اصلی وزارت نفت کارگروه مطالبه گری شهید تندگویان وزارت نفت @kargozinonline1 · 10,710#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
نفت آنلاین @naftonline · 80,070 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
کمپین رزمندگان و جانبازان کشور @newchanlkomakmaeeshat · 25,229 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 September 2026
اخبار خوزستان @akhbar_Khozestan · 23,543 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 September 2026
انرژی نیوز @enenews · 39,954 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
4 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال زرین قانون کارایران” (@ghanonkar2), 61,058 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghanonkar2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.