📌از سال ۹۶ تا الان، کدوم دارایی بیشتر رشد کرده؟ 📈🤔
👍2👌1

Channel
@bazneshastegantaminejtemaee
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,902subscribers
+46 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001518249268 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bazneshastegantaminejtemaee |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bazneshastegantaminejtemaee |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 21:11 | 5,902 | -7 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:21 | 5,909 | +10 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 19:10 | 5,899 | +9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:55 | 5,890 | +4 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:54 | 5,886 | +2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:21 | 5,884 | -7 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 11:09 | 5,891 | +1 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 01:06 | 5,890 | -5 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 17:59 | 5,895 | -5 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 5,900 | +14 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 5,886 | +14 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 5,872 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 5,878 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 5,879 | -6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 5,885 | +9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:34 | 5,876 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 5,873 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 5,875 | +4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 5,871 | +15 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 5,856 | first reading |
50 posts held, back to 16 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 50 (16 August 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 37,309 |
| Reactions total | 222 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 01:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
345 reactions across 44 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 72 | 20.9% | |
| 🤬 | 65 | 18.8% | |
| 👍 | 63 | 18.3% | |
| 😁 | 54 | 15.7% | |
| 👌 | 23 | 6.67% | |
| 👎 | 23 | 6.67% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 3.77% | |
| 💩 | 13 | 3.77% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 1.74% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 1.45% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.87% | |
| 🥱 | 3 | 0.87% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.58% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 345 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (43.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📌از سال ۹۶ تا الان، کدوم دارایی بیشتر رشد کرده؟ 📈🤔
👍2👌1
🔴👈 طرح افزایش حقوق کارمندان و بازنشستگان متناسب با تورم کلید خورد ‼️ 🔵👈 بیات: با تورم موجود در جامعه، حقوق کفایت هزینههای معیشتی را نمیدهد ☑️ 🟤👈 عضو هیأت رئیسه کمیسیون امور داخلی مجلس ⤵️⤵️⤵️ 🟠👈 واقعیت این است که با تورم موجود در جامعه، حقوق کارمندان، کارگران و بازنشستگان کفایت هزینههای معیشتی آنها را نمیدهد و دولت باید نسبت به ترمیم حقوق این قشر اقدام کند. بنده طرحی را با عنوان افزایش حقوق متناسب با …
سلام تامل و تعقل کار هر انسانی ایست که منصفانه و بر اساس منطق و درک و منش خود قدم بردارد اکنون که میبینم دوستانی مطالبه گر چه جناب کریمیان گرانقدر و چه از طرف مطالبه گران پایتخت رفته که بقلم آقای نظری متنی منتشر شده را خواندم و نگاه به انتقادات به جناب آراسته مهر کردم و متوجه شدم چقدر سیاست انگلیسی در ایران جایگاه یافته و چقدر باعث رنجش ما مطالبه گران رنج کشیده شده و چقدر سایرین این وسط باعث تنومندی اختلافات گریده ا…
❤2👌2
📌 مطالبهگری، میدان خودنمایی نیست؛ فرصتی برای احقاق حقوق بازنشستگان است. 🔹 آنچه در روزهای اخیر درباره حضور جمعی از بازنشستگان و فعالان صنفی در تهران مطرح شده، نکات قابل تأملی دارد که شایسته است با نگاهی منصفانه به آن پرداخته شود. بیتردید طرح مطالبات بازنشستگان، از جمله وضعیت بیمه تکمیلی، مشکلات درمان، و مطالبات بیمهای، عدم افزایش مزایای جانبی در سال جاری و مسائل معیشتی، اقدامی ضروری و قابل حمایت است. هیچکس منکر …
🤬2
الان نه تنها من تمام بازنشستگان تامین اجتماعی این مدعیان مطالبه گر نما را بهتر خواهند شناخت معنی مطالبه گری را بازنشستگان بفهمید اگر کسی با دلایل مستند و محکمه پسند و افکار تمام بازنشستگان آن را بپذیرند به انتقاد از مطالبه گری نادرست و یا ریا کارانه مدعیان متوهم که این تعداد ده الی پانزده نفر دچار روان پریشی و خود بزرگ بینی و توهم و طوریکه دروغ گویی خودشان به خودشان در ذهن آنان آنقدر تکرار شده که فکر میکنند راست…
❤2😁1
File, posted without a caption
جناب آقای نواده محمدی! ظاهراً حضور چند نفر از بازنشستگان در یک حرکت صنفی، چنان زلزلهای در برخی محافل مجازی ایجاد کرده که هنوز پس از چند روز، عدهای به جای تحلیل دستاوردها، مشغول شمارش ضربان قلب مخالفان و اندازهگیری میزان سوزش دیگران هستند! اولاً، مطالبهگری نه ملک شخصی کسی است، نه انحصار یک گروه و نه امتیازی که با شناسنامهدار و بیشناسنامه کردن افراد به کسی واگذار شود. هر بازنشستهای که برای حقوق همصنفانش قدمی بر…
💩1
بازرس کانون عالی در درجه ای نیست که مطالبه گران از او چیزی بخواهند همین که گیس می آراید میتواند توجیه بی خاصیتی اش باشد حصرتعالی هم میتوانی بجای سپر ایشان شدن از رنگ موی ایشان بهره ببری چون با شخصیت و نوع بینش ات هم خوانی دارد... گروه اندیشه بدتر که مثل کره شمالی است خواهشا این جوابیه کریمیان به این گروه ارسال شود از طرف اینجانب نوادهمحمدی پ ن :👆 قابل توجه بازنشستگان افرادی با رفتن بی نتیجه و بی پاسخ و بدون خرو…
👍2❤1😁1
جناب مطالبهگر میدانی! ظاهراً در قاموس شما، مطالبهگری فقط چند قلمرو جغرافیایی دارد، سازمان، کانون، خورشت کدو، تلفن ناشناس و سفر ۲۰۰۰ کیلومتری! فقط مانده بود بفرمایید برای دریافت کارت عضویت مطالبهگران، ارائه فاکتور خورشت کدو و گواهی طی مسافت هم الزامی است! برادر عزیز، مطالبهگری نه انحصار سفر است، نه امتیاز حضور در راهروهای ادارات و نه مسابقه تحمل کیلومترها جاده. یکی با حضور میدانی مطالبه میکند، یکی با قلم، یکی با…
🔴 قبض برق گران شد. 🔻گران شدن قبض برق از ابتدای آبان ۱۴۰۵ بهخاطر تغییر نرخ سوخت نیروگاهها استارت میخورد. https://t.me/bazneshastegantaminejtemaee
🤬7
File, posted without a caption
🙏1
کسانیکه بنام مطالبه گر در سطح شهر خود فعال نیستند و سعی در ایجاد وحدت و انسجام و روشنگری نمیکنند ولی خودشان مثلا به دفتر کانون عالی میروند و آنجا ادعای مطالبه گری میکنند من میخواهم بدانم آیا محل مطالبه گری مهم است یا نوع مطالبه گری آیا مثلاً ادعای مطالبه گری کنید و به جاهای دیگر مثل تهران بروید و نهار هم یک پرس جوجه به حساب نماینده کانون عالی میل کنید و سپس اقدام به عکس گرفتند کنید و چند نفری از یکدیگر تعریف و تم…
👌4❤2💩2😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @bazneshastegantaminejtemaee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال اخبار رسمی خانواده بازنشستگان حداقل بگیران تأمین اجتماعی کشور ( محروم از هزینه های زندگی )” (@bazneshastegantaminejtemaee), 5,902 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bazneshastegantaminejtemaee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.