Channel
@ggreenwald
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
158subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001589723738 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ggreenwald |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 20 March 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ggreenwald |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 158 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 157 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 20 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
That incredibly brazen, glaringly politicized and complete reversal in "public health advice" was a major turning point for me, as it was for many, in trusting health authorities. What Fauci did in declaring the "lab leak" theory off-limits is way worse. https://theintercept.com/2020/06/11/the-abrupt-radical-reversal-in-how-public-health-experts-now-speak-about-the-coronavirus-and-mass-gatherings/
AOC, 12/2020, on Antifa activists menacing politicians in public: Activists *should* be impolite. "The whole point of protesting is to make ppl uncomfortable." AOC, last night, to protesters confronting her for funding Biden's proxy war: I won't answer you! "You're being ruude!"
As always happens whenever a crisis is declared, many people decide that abuses of power and civil liberties assaults don't matter given the gravity of the cause. That's what happened with the first War on Terror and it's happening with the 1/6 Committee: https://greenwald.substack.com/p/civil-liberties-are-being-trampled-8bf?s=w
Meanwhile, the foreign policy adviser of Bernie Sanders -- who joined every Dem in voting for BIden's $40b war package - continues the tradition of Dems going to the TNR to scold the left (he singles out Lula and Chomsky) for being insufficiently pro-war: https://newrepublic.com/article/166649/ukraine-matters-american-progressives
The NYT -- usually on board with bipartisan DC war policies -- began signaling resistance when this great news article on the House's approval of Biden's $40b, noting how most lawmakers were too scared to ask questions or voice their long-standing views: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/10/us/politics/congress-ukraine-aid-questions.html
Quando os humanos são capazes de se conectar através do bem que levam em si e de sua humanidade, mesmo reconhecendo (não ignorando) as diferenças importantes, é quando a política mas tb a sociedade prospera. Uma política que exige acordo completo é tóxica, feia e destrutiva.
Everything about being a father is awesome -- except having to see those shit Marvel movies. Smiles were all pre-viewing.
NPR: Conservatives Assuaged by Alito Nomination, Nov. 1, 2005: https://npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4984207
On the weekly getcallin podcast I co-host with qaomene , we'll examine the controversy over Roe v. Wade and the leaked draft, as well as Lula's comments about Ukraine and why the Globo South rejects the US/NATO view on Ukraine. Starting now, live: https://callin.com/room/roe-v-wade-and-scotus-back-on-the-news-KxBrqjkAmh
Given the CIA's traditional role in Brazil (overthrowing its democratically elected center-left government in 1964, then training and supporting the brutal 21-year-old military dictatorship that followed), this new CIA directive is producing interesting responses in Brazil:
Look at what the NYT considers bad and dangerous:
Homeland Security's "Disinformation Board" is Even More Pernicious Than it Seems https://t.co/3e0woIvCsH
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ggreenwald. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 517,003 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Glenn Greenwald” (@ggreenwald), 158 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ggreenwald.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.