Channel
@GlennGreenwald
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
30subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001574310062 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GlennGreenwald |
| Created | 4 January 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GlennGreenwald |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 30 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:51 | 30 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 4 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
That incredibly brazen, glaringly politicized and complete reversal in "public health advice" was a major turning point for me, as it was for many, in trusting health authorities. What Fauci did in declaring the "lab leak" theory off-limits is way worse. https://theintercept.com/2020/06/11/the-abrupt-radical-reversal-in-how-public-health-experts-now-speak-about-the-coronavirus-and-mass-gatherings/
Photo, posted without a caption
As always happens whenever a crisis is declared, many people decide that abuses of power and civil liberties assaults don't matter given the gravity of the cause. That's what happened with the first War on Terror and it's happening with the 1/6 Committee: https://greenwald.substack.com/p/civil-liberties-are-being-trampled-8bf?s=w
Meanwhile, the foreign policy adviser of Bernie Sanders -- who joined every Dem in voting for BIden's $40b war package - continues the tradition of Dems going to the TNR to scold the left (he singles out Lula and Chomsky) for being insufficiently pro-war: https://newrepublic.com/article/166649/ukraine-matters-american-progressives
The NYT -- usually on board with bipartisan DC war policies -- began signaling resistance when this great news article on the House's approval of Biden's $40b, noting how most lawmakers were too scared to ask questions or voice their long-standing views: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/10/us/politics/congress-ukraine-aid-questions.html
Quando os humanos são capazes de se conectar através do bem que levam em si e de sua humanidade, mesmo reconhecendo (não ignorando) as diferenças importantes, é quando a política mas tb a sociedade prospera. Uma política que exige acordo completo é tóxica, feia e destrutiva.
Everything about being a father is awesome -- except having to see those shit Marvel movies. Smiles were all pre-viewing.
Homeland Security's "Disinformation Board" is Even More Pernicious Than it Seems https://t.co/3e0woIvCsH
What is a "disinformation expert"? Does it require a particular degree? Is there some licensing board or official certification issued? What credentials, scholarship or accomplishments are needed to justify someone being lavished with this pompous label? It's a bullshit fraud.
These so-called #NeverTrump GOP operatives and neocons started off pretending they were still the same conservatives as always, just horrified by Trump. But now they have jettisoned almost every view they held, with no explanation, and are full-fledged Dems and nothing more.
Yesterday was a flagship day in corporate media. It was the day they were forced to explicitly state what has long been clear: they not only favor censorship but desperately crave and depend on it. Even if Musk doesn't buy Twitter, never forget what yesterday revealed.
Ukraine's President Zelensky suspends 11 opposition parties, using the same rationale Putin invokes when doing so: they're subversive, with ties to foreign enemies. One of the parties has 10% of elected seats in Ukraine's parliament: https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/world-news/ukraines-president-volodymyr-zelenskyy-suspends-parties-with-russian-links/articleshow/90333402.cms @GlennGreenwald
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @GlennGreenwald. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,219,509 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Glenn Greenwald” (@GlennGreenwald), 30 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GlennGreenwald.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.