Channel
@normalmanbitcoin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
449subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001330957366 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @normalmanbitcoin |
| Created | 6 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/normalmanbitcoin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 449 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 450 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:19 | 450 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 January 2022 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | — |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 01:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2022 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 18 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
[평범한 인사이트 #1] : 지킬과 하이드 그리고 라이트코인 반감기. - 저녁의 나와 아침의 나는 다른 인간이다. - 라이트코인은 4년 주기로 반감기가 있고 사이클이 존재하며 그 안에 투자 기회가 있다. - 지금 당장 적용할 수 있는 전략이 아니다. - 100% 잊어버리고 다른 곳에 눈을 돌리고 있을 것이다. - 그때 나를 잡아줄 알람이 필요하다. Full version 링크
👍1
Channel name was changed to «평범한 인사이트»
Channel photo updated
오늘부터 고로치님이 운영하시는 '같이 가치 투자 공지방' 운영자로 참여하게 됐습니다. 앞으로 '같이 가치 투자 공지방'에서 더 양질의 글을 공유하기 위해 노력하겠습니다. 감사합니다 ㅎㅎ('평남 비트코인 이슈 필터링' 채널은 운영을 중단하니 '같이 가치 투자 공지방'에서 더 많은 고수님들의 더 좋은 인사이트를 받아 보시면 좋을 것 같네요 ㅎㅎ 아마 대부분 이미 입장해 있겠지만 혹시나 채널에 입장하시지 않은 분들을 위해 링크 남깁니다. ) 공지방 : https://t.me/gachi2job 소통방 : https://t.me/gachi2job1
이슈 필터링 : https://blog.naver.com/glawkdxn0328/222625535759 좋은 하루 보내세요 ㅎㅎ
https://thecontrol.co/on-cryptocurrency-communities-f592b5ce6b0b 커뮤니티는 암호화폐가 얼마나 많은 가치를 갖고 있는지 결정합니다. 강력한 커뮤니티를 보유한 암호화폐 프로젝트의 특성은 다음과 같습니다. 1. 투명하고 포용적인 창립 팀. 비트코인의 창립자인 사토시는 bitcointalk.org를 만들고 커뮤니티 구성원들과 교류하는데 매우 적극적이었습니다. 이와 비슷한 커뮤니티를 조성한 것이 이더리움과 makerdao입니다. 리플과 같은 반례도 존재하긴 합니다. 2. 소유권 분산과 명확하게 조정된 인센티브. 사토시는 비트코인을 출시했을 때 소유권과 커뮤니티 간의 연결을 이해했고 누구나 참여할 수 있도록 했습니다. 비탈릭 역시 커뮤니티와 소유권을 연결하는데 집중했습니다. 오늘날 수천만 달러의 자본을…
https://twitter.com/BTCTN/status/1483205655616012288 미국 소비자 설문조사에 따르면 현재 암호화폐를 소유하지 않은 응답자의 25%가 암호화폐 투자를 시작할 계획입니다. “2021년은 암호화폐에 좋은 해였습니다. 암호화폐를 소유한 응답자 중 절반 이상이 지난 1년 이내에 암호화폐에 투자하기 시작했다고 보고했습니다.” 결과에 따르면 "응답자의 47%는 암호화폐를 소유하고 있지 않고 계획도 없다고 답했으며, 응답자의 약 28%는 현재 암호화폐를 소유하고 있다고 답했습니다." 암호화폐 산업의 미래에 대해 어떻게 생각하느냐는 질문에 42%는 양면적이며 이에 대해 잘 모른다고 답한 반면 23%는 자신이 없고 "다 사기/거품이며 붕괴될 것"이라고 생각한다고 말했습니다. " 한편, 19%는 암호화폐 산업이 화폐의 정…
https://blog.logrocket.com/smart-contract-programming-languages/ https://pontem.network/posts/comparison-of-the-top-10-smart-contract-programming-languages-in-2021 더 많은 개발자들이 들어와 좋은 dapp을 개발해야 레이어 1의 애플리케이션 유틸리티가 증가합니다. 때문에 개발자들에게 친숙한 개발 언어를 사용하는 레이어 1이 유리합니다. 레이어1들이 각각 어떤 언어를 사용하는지 알아보시기 바랍니다. 각 언어의 장단점도 함께 보시면 좋을 것 같네요.
https://medium.com/coinshares/volume-61-digital-asset-fund-flows-weekly-report-4408a516661f 이번 주 기관 자금 유출폭이 늘었습니다. 대부분의 코인에서 자금이 빠져나갔습니다. 체크해 보시기 바랍니다.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/opensea-surpasses-3-5b-in-monthly-ether-trading-volume-setting-new-ath OpenSea의 일요일 최고 일일 거래량은 2억 6,100만 달러였습니다. 이번 달 현재까지 OpenSea는 하루 평균 1억 6900만 달러의 거래량을 기록했습니다. 다시 한번 nft가 핫해졌네요. 개인적으로 과열의 시기라고 생각합니다. 이 과열이 언제까지 갈지는 모르지만 이때 좋은 종목을 보는 눈을 기르는 게 가장 좋지 않을까 생각합니다 ㅎㅎ
이슈 필터링 : https://blog.naver.com/glawkdxn0328/222624565180 좋은 하루 보내세요 ㅎㅎ
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @normalmanbitcoin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“평범한 인사이트” (@normalmanbitcoin), 449 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/normalmanbitcoin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.