Channel
@futurologica
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
64subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001473407431 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @futurologica |
| Description | Канал о трендах и перспективах. Для себя, для своих и для тех, кто хочет знать, что будет послезавтра. [email protected] |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/futurologica |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 64 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 64 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
19 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 16 | 84.2% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 15.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2024 to 12 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Будущее нынче уже не то, что прежде – это хорошо известно. А какое же оно? Порассуждал вчера об этом с опорой на данные АЦ ВЦИОМ. Спасибо Президентской академии за предоставленную возможность. И отдельно – «Гуманитарному реактору» за «гуманитарные» тепловые сборки!
👍2
The journey to 2050 could take several routes. By developing a strategy that accounts for multiple possible futures, leaders can safeguard long-term competitiveness while understanding how best to position their organizations today. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2026/beyond-tomorrow-four-scenarios-for-the-world-of-2050
1. В 2023 году физик Джордж Смут — лауреат Нобелевской премии 2006 года за исследование реликтового излучения на конференции в Дубае заявил: «Вероятность того, что мы живём в симуляции, очень высока». Это не первый учёный, высказавший такую идею. Но первый нобелевский лауреат, сделавший это публично и развёрнуто. Он привёл три аргумента. 2. Первый аргумент: квантовая механика работает как компьютерный код. Частицы н…
https://graph.org/Fragment-intervyu-ob-obrazovanii-s-Aleksandrom-Auzanom-02-05 Парадоксальные вещи. Зумеры очень критичны по отношению к людям, в частности, старшего поколения, они не признают авторитетов, они не признают недоказанных правил. Но продукты искусственного интеллекта они воспринимают некритически, полностью доверяются авторитету ИИ. Это видно и по джуниорам в IT-компаниях. Поэтому critical thinking нужн…
👍1
https://sci.rambler.ru/science/55995246-katastrofa-ot-kotoroy-ne-spastis-chto-takoe-razryv-lozhnogo-vakuuma/ Вселенная может находиться в неустойчивом состоянии, которое физики называют метастабильным или «ложным» вакуумом, который может распасться в любой момент. Если это произойдёт, привычная реальность перестанет существовать мгновенно. Рассказываем, почему физики говорят о «пузырях новой физики» и стоит ли переж…
❤2
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/31/style/trends-predictions-2026.html In 2026, we’re going older and bulkier: People will start pulling tobacco pipes out of their purses and pockets. Snuff will take over snus. Everyone’s hungry for a little gasp of Dickensian glamour, for someone to drop the word “dapper” in a conversation crammed with acronyms and algorithms.
https://chesnakov.ru/5-nauchno-populyarnyh-knig-o-budushhem/
👍2
После очередного пакета заявлений прошлой недели про то, как хорошо и правильно рожать в 18, на выходных послушал подкаст #ПроНауку с Татевик Мкртчян — гендиректором "Репробанка", крупнейшего биобанка России. Разговор подтвердил мою старую гипотезу: демографическую проблему решат не ценности, а наука. Два мира, которые не слышат друг друга В одном мире говорят про "традиционные ценности", "возвращение к истокам", мн…
👍2❤1
До евгеники уже совсем близко…
«Не надо путать большие обещания с большими надеждами»: как ИИ в медицине изменит нашу жизнь Ученые из Европейской лаборатории молекулярной биологии, Немецкого центра исследований рака и Копенгагенского университета разработали новый инструмент ИИ, который может предсказать пациентам «личный риск развития более 1000 заболеваний, а также прогнозировать изменения в состоянии здоровья на десятилетие вперед». Созданная…
https://www.forbes.ru/tekhnologii/550131-v-moskve-ispytali-v-polete-golubej-biodronov-s-nejrointerfejsami-rossijskoj-neiry Что дальше? Комары?)
https://www.vedomosti.ru/technology/news/2025/11/12/1154296-mask-cherez?ysclid=mhx40j5q5z831164758
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @futurologica. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Футурологика” (@futurologica), 64 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/futurologica.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.