Before the dog wore a hat The dog wore pants Where the meme all began.

Channel
dogwifpants
@thedogwifpants
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,249subscribers
+2,215 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004457543888 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thedogwifpants |
| Created | 19 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thedogwifpants |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 2,249 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 2,260 | +12 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 2,248 | +2,150 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 98 | +64 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 34 | first reading |
Engagement
3 posts held, back to 19 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 21.0%
- avg views ÷ 2,249 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 473
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 3 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3 (19 August 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 473 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @thedogwifpants. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@multichaintrending · 32,7807 postsTrench Trending 💎⛏️
@soltrenchtrending · 13,5747 posts🦁 LION CALLS 🦁 (Crypto AMAs & Reviews)
@LionCALL · 91,1744 postsTrendify
@trendify · 7,4034 posts𝗙𝗨𝗗𝗗𝗟𝗘𝗦 𝗦𝗧𝗨𝗗𝗜𝗢 𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗦
@fuddles_studio_calls · 30,3853 postsQUEENVLAD CRYPTO GAMBLES X1000
@QUEENVLAD · 10,2153 postsRam J OfficiaL CALLS ☠️
@RamJOfficiaLCaLLS · 14,5313 posts𝗖𝗮𝗽𝗿𝗶 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘀 💎🎯
@CapriCalls · 40,2902 posts@CTOTrends | CTO Alerts & Trending
@CTOTrends · 10,2562 postsPatriot's CaLLs
@Patriot_calls · 12,5022 postsRyoshi Gamble
@ryoshigamble · 38,4002 postsWhale Trending 🐳💵
@solwhaletrending · 37,0422 postsSpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 33,0292 postsThanos Gambles 👾
@ThanosGambles · 4,6652 postsZypher’s Diary
@ZypherDiary · 16,5602 postsAladdin calls 月龍 {TSUKI}
@Aladdincall · 9,3041 postCrafty Gambles
@CraftyGambles · 10,9011 postCrypto King Call
@Crypto_KingCall · 106,2461 postThe Don’s Degens
@degensgems · 15,2801 postKulture_Kall
@Kulture_Kall · 6,5481 postLevis Calls
@LevisAIpha · 31,5451 postMaestros Gamble Degen Apes
@Maestrosdegen · 36,3291 post𝗣𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗻 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗹 🐍 🚀
@PYTHONCALL · 23,1971 postRam’s Gems Calls ✨
@ramscalls · 6,0581 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“dogwifpants” (@thedogwifpants), 2,249 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thedogwifpants.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.