За что я люблю новые технологии. Провёл активно диагностическую сессию с клиентом, при закрытии встречи уже получил обработанное саммари мозгами профильных специалистов и собранные вопросы, которые я не сообразил

Channel
От нуля к единице
@fromzerotoproduct
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
258subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001777525204 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fromzerotoproduct |
| Description | Продуктовые (менеджерские) заметки |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fromzerotoproduct |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 258 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:19 | 258 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 39.4%
- avg views ÷ 258 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 102
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.93%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,929 |
| Reactions total | 49 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 185
- Videos
- 21
- Links
- 90
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
49 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 28 | 57.1% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 18.4% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 12.2% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 6.12% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 4.08% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 2.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
а так, часть моих материалов можно почитать тут: https://vc.ru/id108635
В безИИшную эпоху я был более эффективен, как мне кажется.
👍3
Я выше рассказывал как вёл курсы по JTBD а теперь вспомнил, что когда-то (в 23 если быть точнее собрал большой материал на 60 тезисов) про клиентское интервью. Это выжимка всех моих изысканий по JTBD и CustDev, на основании всего прочитанного мной за тот период. https://habr.com/ru/articles/750240/
👍1
Из дома меня заставляет выйти только закончившийся лимит Codex
😁1
Мои планы отдохнуть до сентября, упорядочить все треки моей жизни не дожили и конца июля. Хорошие были планы. А случилось то, что мне предложили консалтинг, а там на удивление оказалось денег больше чем в найме (по крайней мере тех что у меня были в найме) и у меня появилась новая головная боль - остаться в консалте, или же все таки найти уютное место в найме. Оказалось ещё вот что. В консалте ты должен быть ковбое…
❤3🤝1
Как говорится "Нет ничего более постоянного, чем временное" Периодически во мне просыпается желание сменить аватарку, которому я не могу просто сопротивляться. В этот раз, у нас вот этот мужик, который решил отдохнуть на привале и заодно совместить приятное с полезным. В этот раз у него Антихрупкость Нассима Талеба
Channel photo updated
В процессе разбора всей своей макулатуры и сборки единой базы наткнулся на старую презентацию. Я готовил её к небольшому циклу лекций о продуктовом подходе в организациях, кажется, это был уже далёкий 2021 год. Тогда я рассказывал про JTBD - о том, что человек выбирает продукт ради конкретного изменения в своей жизни или работе. Задача продуктовой команды — разобраться, какого именно изменения он ждёт, в какой ситуа…
Для тех кто хочет хакать лаборатории при сдаче анализов, можно использовать для этого использовать Иишки и подбирать оптимальные пакеты, чтоб эконмить. Сегодня предстоит задача высосать кровь моим деткам, чтоб определить ... если честно понятия не имею для чего это количество нужно им сдавать. Так вот, не знал как выбрать оптимальные пакеты лабораторий. Я просто отдал это все искусственной голове и он мне посчитал 2…
👍1
В итоге, следующую сессию записал на диктофон
👍2
Стоило мне написать о граноле, как об удобном сервисе-стенографисте встреч, как следующая же оффлайн встреча в итоге не обработалась и 160 минут рабочей сессии остались только в моей голове. Мораль сей басни: всегда имейте вариант Б в процессах, когда вариант А основан на автоматизации.
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fromzerotoproduct. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 166,972 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“От нуля к единице” (@fromzerotoproduct), 258 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fromzerotoproduct.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.