Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Дневник CTO

@cto_diary

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,658subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001537026308
TypeChannel
Username@cto_diary
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cto_diary

Growth

2,6572,6582,657.57 Aug 2026, 02:02 — 2,657 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:52 — 2,658 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:027 Aug 2026, 18:52
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,657–2,658 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 18:522,658+1
7 Aug 2026, 02:022,657first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.1%
avg views ÷ 2,658 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,630
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held20 (20 February 202629 July 2026)
Views total8,125
Reactions total400
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,137 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
39634.8%
👍34330.2%
😁13411.8%
🔥1008.80%
🤯373.25%
🎉292.55%
💯282.46%
❤‍🔥232.02%
😭110.967%
🤣110.967%
🏆90.792%
60.528%
🤝60.528%
👀10.088%
👎10.088%
👾10.088%
😱10.088%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,137reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 07:51 UTC935 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Недавно меня спросили — стоит ли сейчас идти в универ? У универа есть две цели — хард скилы и окружение. И если говорить про хард-скилы, то это очень сомнтиельная цель, ведь мы понимаем, что ИИ-шка слишком хороша в этом. Непонятно, насколько лучше она станет еще через год и еще. Если человек хочет ее правильно оркестрировать, он должен много, долго и упорно учиться Так вот умение долго, много и упорно учиться — вот

👍3412💯6

Signed Muammar Al-Shedivat

22 Jul 2026, 06:16 UTC≈1,560 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Можно бесконечно смотреть на 3 вещи: • Огонь • Вода • Как кодинг агент что-то реверс-инженерит

👍19🔥8🤣2

Signed Muammar Al-Shedivat

20 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC≈1,580 views171 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В мои 31 меня очень сильно вдохновляет отец. Он стабильно делает 10,000 шагов, недавно начал бегать, держал кето-диету. А также он серьезно начал учить Коран. Вот уже 5 джузов выучил! И хочет стартовать новый бизнес. В его то почти 60 лет! В общем, я на него смотрю и постоянно нахожу для себя зоны роста 😁 Ну и так как он читает мой канал, пусть знает: папочка, я очень тебя люблю ❤️

120🔥33🏆9❤‍🔥5👍4

Signed Muammar Al-Shedivat

19 Jul 2026, 13:31 UTC≈2,100 views61 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как расти разработчику после всяких Claude/Codex/Cursor? Первое: мастерство сместилось. Раньше мастерством было написание кода — сначала на ассемблере, потом на C, потом на Python. Сейчас мастерство — это умение правильно готовить Claude Code, Codex и Cursor. Главная задача: сделать агентов максимально независимыми. Дойти от «дал задачу и поправил 20 раз» до «дал задачу и поправил максимум один раз». Сокращение этог

👍40🔥155👾1

Signed Muammar Al-Shedivat

15 Jul 2026, 16:40 UTC≈1,950 views87 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В последние месяцы в UvU убедились, что малые последовательные действия долгосрочно ведут к большим результатам. На лендинге оптимизировали конверсии, улучшили воронку продаж, там-сям покрутили. Везде по 5-10%, а суммарно уже очень крутой результат выходит Когда у тебя вечный майндсет стартапа, что "нужно расти на 200% в год", часто забиваешь на какие-то такие мелочи в погоне за "иксами". Но что я понял, где-то "икс

👍3933🔥123

Signed Muammar Al-Shedivat

22 Jun 2026, 05:19 UTC≈2,360 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Наблюдал за многими командами разрабов и заметил, что на дворе июнь 2026 года, а с приходом ИИ продуктивность команд по-прежнему выросла лишь на 30-40%. Хотя те команды, с которыми я работал и соприкасался, уже выжимают +300% Сейчас у меня появилось немного свободного времени для консультаций, так что если хотите, чтобы я лично погрузился в вашу специфику и помог выжать x3 продуктивности — пишите

👍17🔥15🤣91👀1😭1

Signed Muammar Al-Shedivat

12 Jun 2026, 06:38 UTC≈2,810 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Рубрика лайфхак Если заканчиваются токены (допустим, ресет через 2 часа), то просто остановите кодинг агента посреди выполнения и скажите: усни на 2 часа и продолжи где остановился. Особенно бывает полезным, если вся ночь впереди, а ты боишься, что твои задачи высасут все токены раньше, и работа прекратится

👍21🔥111😁1

Signed Muammar Al-Shedivat

11 Jun 2026, 05:37 UTC≈2,370 views73 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Недавно услышал: "Не понимаю, почему Муаммар ушел из Яндекса. У него был один из самых быстрых промоушенов в истории компании до тимлида" Вся правда о моем промоушене в этой гифке 😁

😁685

Signed Muammar Al-Shedivat

27 May 2026, 05:50 UTC≈2,740 views93 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ид аль-Адха мубарак! С праздником! 🎉🎉🎉

64🎉29

Signed Muammar Al-Shedivat

11 May 2026, 12:38 UTC≈2,890 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Трансформация роли CTO Раньше основным клиентом CTO был CPO, потому что разработка была дорогим удовольствием, и только на продукт в конечном итоге выделялись средства. Все остальное закрывалось человеческим трудом. Сейчас правила игры поменялись Почти что во всех отделах в 2026 году можно внедрять AI и быть от этого в выигрыше: операционка, финансы, продажи, маркетинг Так что роль CTO сейчас расширилась. В целом

👍20🔥52💯2

Signed Muammar Al-Shedivat

28 Apr 2026, 06:05 UTC≈3,610 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026

До 2026 года основным ремеслом, куда уходила куча времени, у большинства программистов был кодинг. Поэтому развитие инструментов и оптимизация в первую очередь были вокруг кодинга Начиная с 2026 года, это уже не так. Поэтому задача каждого программиста — понять, куда у вас больше всего уходит времени и автоматизировать это с помощью AI. Именно это поможет вам стать x10 программистом Пример. В одном из проектов, что

👍4914🔥1

Signed Muammar Al-Shedivat

25 Apr 2026, 07:48 UTC≈2,400 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Все кто использовал iterm2 и работает много в консольном Claude Code, советую пересесть на Warp. Я ни разу не пожалел

👍14

Signed Muammar Al-Shedivat

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cto_diary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 205,464 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дневник CTO” (@cto_diary), 2,658 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cto_diary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.