https://petitions.assemblee-nationale.fr/initiatives/i-5725

Channel
Soutien aux soignants suspendus
@soutiensoignants
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
325subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001333237295 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @soutiensoignants |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/soutiensoignants |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 325 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 330 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 329 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 329 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.31%
- avg views ÷ 325 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 27.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 September 2025 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 27 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 13m 42s
- Average length
- 4m 34s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7 | 58.3% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
La loi euthanasie est un catalogue des horreurs : Les hôpitaux chrétiens seront contraints de l’appliquer ou de fermer. Les infirmiers et pharmaciens n’auront pas d’objection de conscience. Il n’y a pas de délit d’incitation au suicide assisté ou à l’euthanasie. Les médecins devront écrire « mort naturelle » sur le certificat de décès. Le délai de réflexion pourra être aussi bref que deux jours. Il ne reste qu’…
C'est la *dernière ligne droite*. Le 15 juillet, les députés auront le dernier mot sur l'*euthanasie*. Le 15 juillet, si rien ne change : L'euthanasie deviendra un droit en France, avec les conditions d'application les plus permissives au monde Des soignants seront amenés à franchir une ligne fondamentale : donner délibérément la mort à ceux qu'ils ont pour mission de soigner. Des pharmaciens et responsables d'établi…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
LOI SUR L'EUTHANASIE Jean-François Rousset (député macroniste) s'impatiente, et dit qu'il faut avancer sur ce texte car "il y a des gens qui sont en train de mourir dans une chaleur torride", et "il faut les aider". https://t.co/jsjB45EGI6 Profiter de la canicule pour imposer l'euthanasie des malades, des vieux ! Tu as trop chaud, pas de clim mais une petite piqûre! ça fait des économies! Au passage la journée de sol…
J’ai rejoint cette semaine ce mouvement : https://palliatifsolutions.fr Il s’agit de regrouper les soignants qui s’opposent à l’euthanasie pour s’adresser collectivement aux députés et tenter d’en gagner 70 d’ici le vote du 15 juillet. Plusieurs vidéos ont été produites et seront diffusées à partir d’aujourd’hui. Je vous tiens au courant pour les partages sur les réseaux sociaux de ces vidéos.
Amis soignant, qui que tu sois! J'ai un message pour toi! La loi sur l'euthanasie va bientôt revenir à l'assemblée... Mais il n'est pas trop tard! Et même, parce qu'il en est encore temps... tu as LE DEVOIR de 'l'ouvrir'!! Pour ce faire, voici une pétition lancée par le Pr Sapin et quelques arguments (je précise: le lien renvoie vers la pétition du Pr Sapin, tout ce qui est écrit ici sont mes propos) 1) La pétition …
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeuWeLpRI2MyRQRIZ3UkVO-hriETbYu4HqCwM4kNW2ba31ajQ/viewform Soignants : signez l'appel du Professeur Sapin pour refuser de pousser la seringue qui tue !
Loi euthanasie : nouvel appel au jeûne Il y a un an maintenant, différentes organisations chrétiennes et en particulier le synode des Églises Protestantes Réformées Évangéliques (UNEPREF) avaient lancé un appel à la prière et au jeûne alors que la loi sur l’euthanasie commençait d’être examinée. Il est temps de rempiler: nous vivons des temps importants. https://parlafoi.fr/2026/06/03/euthanasie-jeune/ Pour interp…
💉🚨Sénat : l'obligation vaccinale antigrippale pour les soignants adoptée à main levée ! Malgré le rejet à l'Assemblée nationale, l'avis contre de la HAS, et les arguments scientifiques de l'AIMSIB sur l'inefficacité du vaccin. 52% des Français blâment les mensonges du gouvernement pour la perte de confiance dans la politique sanitaire vaccinale. La liberté et le consentement libre et éclairé sont en péril. https://ww…
Video, posted without a caption
Depuis 2021 un truc semble avoir changé...
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @soutiensoignants. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 440,719 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Soutien aux soignants suspendus” (@soutiensoignants), 325 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/soutiensoignants.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.