Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 54 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,837–7,883 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Sept 2026, 14:37
7,842
-2
16 Sept 2026, 00:40
7,844
-4
12 Sept 2026, 17:18
7,848
-4
8 Sept 2026, 09:41
7,852
+3
3 Sept 2026, 09:34
7,849
-12
31 Aug 2026, 10:36
7,861
+5
28 Aug 2026, 13:04
7,856
-5
25 Aug 2026, 19:17
7,861
-12
22 Aug 2026, 18:06
7,873
-5
19 Aug 2026, 17:42
7,878
+3
16 Aug 2026, 18:58
7,875
+3
13 Aug 2026, 09:34
7,872
+9
10 Aug 2026, 04:26
7,863
+7
7 Aug 2026, 03:20
7,856
-4
6 Aug 2026, 04:01
7,860
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:53
7,860
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
44s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
135 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
77
57.0%
👍
20
14.8%
🤩
11
8.15%
⚡
9
6.67%
👌
6
4.44%
🔥
6
4.44%
👏
3
2.22%
🤔
3
2.22%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
تلسكوب "جيمس ويب" يصعق العلماء: اكتشاف ماء في قلب المجرة وقريب جداً من الثقب الأسود!
هذا المقال يتناول اكتشافاً مثيراً للاهتمام بواسطة تلسكوب جيمس ويب الفضائي (JWST) في مركز مجرتنا، درب التبانة. إليك ملخص لأبرز النقاط:
الاكتشاف: رصد علماء الفلك وجود "ماء" وجزيئات غبار في بيئة قاسية جداً بالقرب من الثقب الأسود الهائل في مركز مجرتنا (Sagittarius A*).
المصدر: ركزت الدراسة على نجم محتضر يُدعى IRS 3، وهو نجم عملاق …
شهد كسوف 12 أغسطس 2026 مشاهد مذهلة من الفضاء، حيث التقطت مركبات وأقمار صناعية صورًا للكسوف ولـظل القمر وهو يعبر سطح الأرض كمنطقة مظلمة هائلة.
كما رصدت مركبة Proba-3 مشهدًا نادرًا للكسوف من الفضاء، ما أتاح للعلماء رؤية الظاهرة بطريقة مختلفة تمامًا عن مشاهدتها من سطح الأرض.
(حقوق الصورة: ESA/Eumetsat)
اكتشف العلماء بقايا نجم ميت في سديم الحلزون، ويبدو أنها تعطينا لمحة عن المستقبل البعيد لشمسنا.
هذا النجم مرّ بمرحلة شبيهة بما ستفعله الشمس مستقبلًا: فقد طبقاته الخارجية، وتبعثرت مادته في المجرة، تاركًا وراءه قزمًا أبيض. أي أننا نرى تقريبًا كيف يمكن أن تكون نهاية شمسنا بعد نحو 5 مليارات سنة.
تذكرون عندما نشرنا خبر اصطدام صاروخ سبيس إكس بسطح القمر؟
اليوم، رصد المسبار الكوري الجنوبي Danuri الفوهة التي خلّفها صاروخ تابع لشركة سبيس إكس بعد اصطدامه بسطح القمر، والتقط صورًا تُظهر آثار الاصطدام بوضوح.
ويساعد هذا الرصد العلماء على دراسة كيفية تشكّل الفوهات على سطح القمر، وتحسين فهمهم لتأثير الاصطدامات على التربة القمرية، وهي معلومات مهمة لدعم البعثات والاستكشافات القمرية المستقبلية.
دول يمكنها رؤية الكسوف (جزئياً): المغرب، الجزائر، تونس، وموريتانيا.
دول لن تشهد الكسوف: العراق، مصر، دول الخليج، والأردن وسوريا ولبنان وفلسطين.
👍5❤🔥2🤔2
Signed مُصْطَفىٰ
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @SP3CE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Forensic medicine @forensicmedicine_videos · 28,512 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 9 September 2026
Read more @Reading12 · 26,021 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
روائع الأدب الساخر @TNT_1000 · 27,661 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الفضاء - SPACE .” (@SP3CE), 7,842 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SP3CE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
